Field evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen test: Are rapid antigen tests less reliable among the elderly?

被引:1
|
作者
Irena Tabain [1 ]
Djivo Cucevic [2 ]
Nikola Skreb [3 ]
Anna Mrzljak [3 ,4 ]
Ivana Ferencak [1 ]
Zeljka Hruskar [1 ]
Anita Misic [1 ]
Josipa Kuzle [1 ]
Ana Marija Skoda [1 ]
Hrvojka Jankovic [1 ]
Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Virology, Croatian Institute of Public Health  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Emergency Medicine of the City of Zagreb
[2] School of Medicine, University of Zagreb
[3] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Hospital Zagreb
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R563.1 [肺炎]; R446.6 [免疫学检验];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ; 100208 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) leads to the development of accessible and cost-effective rapid antigen-detection tests(RATs), as quick and accurate diagnosis is crucial to curb the pandemic.AIM To evaluate the Humasis COVID-19 Ag Test(Humasis Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) in the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2(SARS-CoV-2).METHODS This retrospective study was carried out at the Croatian Institute of Public Health and included patients with clinical symptoms of COVID-19 lasting no longer than 5 d prior to testing, whose nasopharyngeal swabs were primarily tested with RAT. Negative RAT samples underwent confirmatory real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR). Diagnostic efficacy was determined compared to RT-PCR. The patients were divided into three age groups(< 18, 19-65, > 65 years). Statistical analysis was performed with the significance level set at P < 0.05.RESULTS In total, 2490 symptomatic patients were tested; 953 samples were positive on RAT, and 1537 were negative. All negative RAT samples were subjected to RT-PCR; 266 samples were positive and marked as false-negative results on RAT. The calculated negative predictive value as a measure of RAT efficacy was 82.69%. The c2 test and Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference in the proportion of false negatives(P < 0.001) and RT-PCR cycle(Ct) values for false-negative RATs(P = 0.012) among the age groups. The young age group was significantly less likely to be false negative, whereas the false negatives from the elderly group experienced significantly lower Ct values than the other two age groups.CONCLUSION Evaluated RAT demonstrated satisfactory performance with more reliable results in younger patients. Humasis COVID-19 Ag RAT is potentially a valuable tool in areas where access to molecular methods is limited; however, RT-PCR remains a gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
引用
收藏
页码:6456 / 6463
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Rolling out COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests: the time is now
    Peeling, Rosanna W.
    Olliaro, Piero
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (08): : 1052 - 1053
  • [43] Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
    Vilches, Thomas N.
    Rafferty, Ellen
    Wells, Chad R.
    Galvani, Alison P.
    Moghadas, Seyed M.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [44] Rapid Antigen Tests For Safe School Opening in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era
    Goldenfeld, Miki
    Cohen, Carmit
    Gilboa, Mayan
    Pessach, Itai M.
    Mehnick, Bella
    Tal, Ilana
    Meltzer, Lilac
    Amit, Sharon
    Gonen, Tal
    Afek, Arnon
    Kreiss, Yitshak
    Regev-Yochay, Gili
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2022, 41 (08) : E312 - E317
  • [45] Accuracy of Point-of-Care Rapid Antigen Tests for Diagnosis of COVID-19
    Clebak, Karl T.
    Snyder, Jessica
    Felix, Todd M.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2023, 107 (04) : 354 - 355
  • [46] Comparison of the analytical sensitivity of COVID-19 rapid antigen tests in Australia and Canada
    Toft, Casey J.
    Stocks, Bradley B.
    Schaeffer, Patrick M.
    TALANTA, 2024, 275
  • [47] Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
    Thomas N. Vilches
    Ellen Rafferty
    Chad R. Wells
    Alison P. Galvani
    Seyed M. Moghadas
    BMC Medicine, 20
  • [48] COVID-19 rapid antigen testing strategies require careful evaluation
    Dinnes, Jacqueline
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2021, 70
  • [49] Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests in COVID-19 Patients
    Tuyji Tok, Yesim
    Dinc, Harika Oyku
    Akcin, Ruveyda
    Dasdemir, Ferhat Osman
    Eryigit, Onder Yuksel
    Demirci, Mehmet
    Gareayaghi, Nesrin
    Kuskucu, Mert Ahmet
    Kocazeybek, Bekir Sami
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2022, 56 (02): : 251 - 262
  • [50] Performance Evaluation of Five Rapid At-Home COVID-19 Antigen Tests against the Omicron Variant
    Sugiharto, Victor A. A.
    Gatrell, Stephanie K. K.
    Chen, Hua-Wei
    Blazek, Gabrielle R. R.
    Cherry, Amanda M. M.
    Schilling, Megan
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (01):