Performance Evaluation of Five Rapid At-Home COVID-19 Antigen Tests against the Omicron Variant

被引:6
|
作者
Sugiharto, Victor A. A. [1 ,2 ]
Gatrell, Stephanie K. K. [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Hua-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Blazek, Gabrielle R. R. [1 ,2 ]
Cherry, Amanda M. M. [1 ,3 ]
Schilling, Megan [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Res Ctr, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
[2] Henry M Jackson Fdn, Bethesda, MD 20817 USA
[3] Leidos, Reston, VA USA
来源
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM | 2023年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
COVID-19; Omicron; rapid tests;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.02286-22
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The emergence of the Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is due to mutations as part of the virus evolution process. These mutations might affect the sensitivity of diagnostic tests that are currently being used to detect the virus. Rapid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen tests can be used to aid in quickly identifying positive cases, which can help mitigate the spread of COVID-19 infection. Using previously characterized Omicron-positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), non-Omicron-positive SARS-CoV-2, and negative samples, we evaluated five brands of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests (On/Go at-home COVID-19 rapid antigen self-test, iHealth COVID-19 antigen rapid test, QuickVue SARS antigen test, Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 card home test, and InBios SCoV-2 Ag detect rapid self-test). Our results showed that these rapid tests had similar levels of sensitivity to Omicron and non-Omicron variants (On/Go, 76.4% and 71.0%; iHealth, 73.0% and 71.0%; QuickVue, 84.3% and 74.3%; BinaxNOW, 69.7% and 71.0%; and InBios, 66.3% and 64.5%, respectively). In conclusion, rapid COVID-19 antigen tests can continue to be used as part of public health measures to combat the spread of the Omicron variant, as their sensitivity was not significantly affected.IMPORTANCE The emergence of the Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is due to mutations as part of the virus evolution process. These mutations might affect the sensitivity of diagnostic tests that are currently being used to detect the virus. Because rapid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen tests are commonly used in the general population, it is important to assess their performance in detecting the Omicron variant. Here, we compared the performance of five brands of rapid tests against Omicron and non-Omicron variants using nasopharyngeal swab samples in viral transport media. Our result found no difference in their performance, suggesting no reduction in sensitivity when used to detect the Omicron variant.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Warning Against Counterfeit At-home COVID-19 Tests
    Larkin, Howard D.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 327 (21): : 2067 - 2067
  • [2] Validation of an At-Home Direct Antigen Rapid Test for COVID-19
    Harmon, Alexander
    Chang, Celina
    Salcedo, Nol
    Sena, Brena
    Herrera, Bobby Brooke
    Bosch, Irene
    Holberger, Laura E.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (08)
  • [3] Combined Symptom Screening and At-Home Tests for COVID-19
    Alemi, Farrokh
    Vang, Jee
    Bagais, Wejdan Hassan
    Guralnik, Elina
    Wojtusiak, Janusz
    Moeller, F. Gerard
    Schilling, Josh
    Peterson, Rachele
    Roess, Amira
    Jain, Praduman
    [J]. QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 32 (01) : S11 - S20
  • [4] Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron variant
    de Oliveira Campos, Daniel Melo
    da Silva, Maria Karolaynne
    Silva de Oliveira, Claudio Bruno
    Fulco, Umberto Laino
    Nobre Oliveira, Jonas Ivan
    [J]. IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2022,
  • [5] SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests and universal screening for COVID-19 Omicron variant among hospitalized children
    Kam, Kai-Qian
    Maiwald, Matthias
    Chong, Chia Yin
    Thoon, Koh Cheng
    Nadua, Karen Donceras
    Loo, Liat Hui
    Tan, Natalie Woon Hui
    Li, Jiahui
    Yung, Chee Fu
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2023, 51 (03) : 255 - 260
  • [6] Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19
    Yamayoshi, Seiya
    Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko
    Koga, Michiko
    Akasaka, Osamu
    Nakachi, Ichiro
    Koh, Hidefumi
    Maeda, Kenji
    Adachi, Eisuke
    Saito, Makoto
    Nagai, Hiroyuki
    Ikeuchi, Kazuhiko
    Ogura, Takayuki
    Baba, Rie
    Fujita, Kensuke
    Fukui, Takahiro
    Ito, Fumimaro
    Hattori, Shin-Ichiro
    Yamamoto, Kei
    Nakamoto, Takato
    Furusawa, Yuri
    Yasuhara, Atsuhiro
    Ujie, Michiko
    Yamada, Shinya
    Ito, Mutsumi
    Mitsuya, Hiroaki
    Omagari, Norio
    Yotsuyanagi, Hiroshi
    Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko
    Imai, Masaki
    Kawaoka, Yoshihiro
    [J]. VIRUSES-BASEL, 2020, 12 (12):
  • [7] Falsification of home rapid antigen lateral flow tests during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Devashish Ray
    Raenhha Dhami
    Jan Lecouturier
    Laura J. McGowan
    Aritra Mukherjee
    Ivo Vlaev
    Michael P. Kelly
    Falko F. Sniehotta
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 14
  • [8] Falsification of home rapid antigen lateral flow tests during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Ray, Devashish
    Dhami, Raenhha
    Lecouturier, Jan
    Mcgowan, Laura J.
    Mukherjee, Aritra
    Vlaev, Ivo
    Kelly, Michael P.
    Sniehotta, Falko F.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [9] Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests in COVID-19 Patients
    Tuyji Tok, Yesim
    Dinc, Harika Oyku
    Akcin, Ruveyda
    Dasdemir, Ferhat Osman
    Eryigit, Onder Yuksel
    Demirci, Mehmet
    Gareayaghi, Nesrin
    Kuskucu, Mert Ahmet
    Kocazeybek, Bekir Sami
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2022, 56 (02): : 251 - 262
  • [10] Duration of effectiveness of vaccination against COVID-19 caused by the omicron variant
    Higdon, Melissa M.
    Baidya, Anurima
    Walter, Karoline K.
    Patel, Minal K.
    Issa, Hanane
    Espie, Emmanuelle
    Feikin, Daniel R.
    Knoll, Maria Deloria
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (08): : 1114 - 1116