Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Assess Gastrostomy Balloon Placement

被引:0
|
作者
Ravi, Nithin S. [1 ]
Mistry, Rakesh D. [2 ]
Orsborn, Jonathan [1 ]
Dillon, Mairead [1 ]
Tutman, Jeffrey [3 ]
Hayes, Kari [3 ]
Wallace, Carmelle [1 ]
Lowe, Jeremiah T. [1 ]
Vu, Tien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Pediat Emergency Med, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Sect Emergency Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Aurora, CO USA
来源
关键词
Ultrasound; POCUS; Gastrostomy; Diagnostics; Gastrojejunostomy; TUBE REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.09.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Fluoroscopy is the gold standard for evaluation of gastrostomy tube (GT) placement, though it is costly and resource-intensive. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has potential as a low-risk alternative to confirm GT placement. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for identification of correct gastrostomy balloon placement as compared to fluoroscopy. Methods: This was a prospective convenience sample of children presenting to interventional radiology for routine GT or gastrojejunal (GJ) tube exchange. Prior to exchange, POCUS operators scanned and interpreted ultrasound images for GT placement, followed by fluoroscopy. A blinded characteristics, concordance with 95% confidence intervals, and interrater agreement (Cohen's Kappa) between POCUS and fluoroscopy were calculated. Results: Four (3%) of 118 evaluated GT balloons were displaced. Compared to fluoroscopy, novice POCUS assessment of GT/GJ balloon placement had a sensitivity of 87% (79%-92%), specificity of 25% (1%-81%), PPV of 97% (92%-99%), NPV of 6% (1%30%), proportion agreement of 85%, (77%-91%) kappa 91% (84%, 96%), proportion agreement of 89% (82%94%), kappa 0.09. pH testing had the highest sensitivity of 93% (85%, 97%), proportion of agreement 92% (84%-97%) and kappa 0.19. Conclusion: POCUS demonstrated a high sensitivity and concordance for GT/GJ balloon placement, with low interrater agreement with fluoroscopy. POCUS may not add additional clinical benefit in routine evaluation of GTs over current standards of care. However, POCUS may serve as a useful screening test in settings where fluoroscopy is unavailable or pH is unobtainable. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 116
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Confirmation of Nasogastric and Orogastric Tube Placement in Pediatric Patients
    Claiborne, Mary Kate
    Gross, Toni
    McGreevy, Jon
    Riemann, Monique
    Temkit, M'hamed
    Augenstein, Julie
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 37 (12) : E1611 - E1615
  • [42] Point-of-Care Ultrasound Protocol for Insertion and Confirmation of Central Venous Catheter Placement
    Soares, Pedro R.
    Maia, Andre
    Fernandes, Jorge R.
    Faustino, Diogo
    Campos, Ana Luisa
    Almeida, Luis R.
    Mariz, Jose
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [43] Point-of-care ultrasound to assess volume status and pulmonary oedema in malaria patients
    Christina M. Pugliese
    Bayode R. Adegbite
    Jean R. Edoa
    Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma
    Fridia A. Obone-Atome
    Charlotte C. Heuvelings
    Sabine Bélard
    Laura C. Kalkman
    Stije J. Leopold
    Thomas Hänscheid
    Ayola A. Adegnika
    Mischa A. Huson
    Martin P. Grobusch
    Infection, 2022, 50 : 65 - 82
  • [44] Use of point-of-care ultrasound to assess the severity of scorpion stings in hospitalized patients
    Almeida, Juliana Sartorelo
    Gomez Ravetti, Cecilia
    de Melo Andrade, Marcus Vinicius
    de Andrade Filho, Adebal
    Silva e Castro, Rafael
    Pires Costa Pimenta, Pedro
    Frizera Vassallo, Paula
    Nobre, Vandack
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2024, 62 (03) : 145 - 151
  • [45] Point-of-care ultrasound to assess volume status and pulmonary oedema in malaria patients
    Pugliese, Christina M.
    Adegbite, Bayode R.
    Edoa, Jean R.
    Mombo-Ngoma, Ghyslain
    Obone-Atome, Fridia A.
    Heuvelings, Charlotte C.
    Belard, Sabine
    Kalkman, Laura C.
    Leopold, Stije J.
    Hanscheid, Thomas
    Adegnika, Ayola A.
    Huson, Mischa A.
    Grobusch, Martin P.
    INFECTION, 2022, 50 (01) : 65 - 82
  • [46] Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations
    Bjarte Sorensen
    Steinar Hunskaar
    The Ultrasound Journal, 11
  • [47] Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations
    Sorensen, Bjarte
    Hunskaar, Steinar
    ULTRASOUND JOURNAL, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [48] Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Pediatric Clinical Care
    McLario, David J.
    Sivitz, Adam B.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2015, 169 (06) : 594 - 600
  • [49] Point-of-care renal ultrasound: Interpret with care
    Koratala, Abhilash
    Bhattacharya, Deepti
    Chamarthi, Gajapathiraju
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2019, 7 (01): : 233 - 235
  • [50] Point-of-care ultrasound: Deploying in primary care
    Hickner, John
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 67 (02): : 56 - 56