LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors

被引:2
|
作者
Benlidayi, Ilke Coskun [1 ]
Gupta, Latika [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, TR-01380 Adana, Turkiye
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Musculoskeletal & Dermatol Sci, Ctr Musculoskeletal Res, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Royal Wolverhampton Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Rheumatol, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, England
关键词
Medical Writing; Letter; Correspondence as Topic; JOURNAL CLUB; EXERCISE; WRITE;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e296
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Correspondence in the form of letters to the editor serves multiple scholarly purposes, including critiquing previously published articles, engaging in discourse with other correspondents, commenting on the journal's structure or style, and contributing insights for future publications. The composition of such letters warrants meticulous attention, as they play a crucial role in fostering communication between the journal and its readership. Adherence to specific principles is essential in crafting an effective letter to the editor. These communications should be concise, lucid, and adhere to a professional tone. The content should be constructive in nature and substantiated by rigorous scientific evidence and appropriate citations. The structure of a letter to the editor typically encompasses several key components: a title, an opening section, the main body of the correspondence, a closing statement, and a list of references. This article aims to establish Letter to the Editor Standards as a comprehensive guide for authors, reviewers, and editorial boards, thereby enhancing the quality and impact of this crucial form of academic discourse.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
    Benlidayi, Ilke Coskun
    Gupta, Latika
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 39 (30)
  • [2] Cartoons in Scholarly Publishing: Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
    Benlidayi, Ilke Coskun
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2025, 40 (04)
  • [3] Theoretical report: reflections and considerations for authors, reviewers, and editors
    Bormann de Souza Filho, Breno Augusto
    Tritany, Erika Fernandes
    Struchiner, Claudio Jose
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2022, 56
  • [4] AUTHORS, REVIEWERS, AND EDITORS
    JACOBSEN, E
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 71 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [5] Authors, editors and reviewers
    Maughan, R
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2003, 21 (08) : 591 - 591
  • [6] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Blackmore, Heather
    Kitas, George D.
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (11) : 1409 - 1417
  • [7] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    Heather Blackmore
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2011, 31
  • [8] Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Kitas, George D.
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 33 (02) : 277 - 284
  • [9] Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2013, 33 : 277 - 284
  • [10] Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Akazhanov, Nurbek A.
    Kitas, George D.
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (06) : 600 - 608