Cartoons in Scholarly Publishing: Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors

被引:0
|
作者
Benlidayi, Ilke Coskun [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, TR-01380 Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Caricature; Cartoon; Medical Writing; Scholarly Communication;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e83
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cartoons in scholarly publishing are effective ways to improve communication and engagement. They can transform scientific concepts into visually interesting and easy- to-understand formats, thereby helping the concepts reach to larger groups more easily. Depending on the type of cartoons (concept cartoons, humor illustrations, and editorial cartoons), benefits may vary. It is recommended to maintain relevance, elegance, and quality in cartoon presentations. Potential insults must be carefully avoided to maintain respectful communication. The objectives of the current article were to examine the complex roles of cartoons in scholarly publishing, to provide recommendations for drawing scientific cartoons, and to discuss challenges in incorporating cartoons into scientific publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2013, 33 : 277 - 284
  • [2] Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Kitas, George D.
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 33 (02) : 277 - 284
  • [3] Towards improved understanding of students and junior scholars as authors, reviewers, editors and leaders in scholarly publishing
    Steuer, Max
    Plancarte-Escobar, Rafael
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2022, 35 (03) : 306 - 307
  • [4] Academic publishing Best practice for editors, guest editors, authors and reviewers
    Gilmore, Audrey
    Carson, David
    Perry, Chad
    EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 18 (06) : 468 - 478
  • [5] Predatory Publishing: What Authors, Reviewers, and Editors Need to Know
    Yucha, Carolyn
    BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH FOR NURSING, 2015, 17 (01) : 5 - 7
  • [6] Theoretical report: reflections and considerations for authors, reviewers, and editors
    Bormann de Souza Filho, Breno Augusto
    Tritany, Erika Fernandes
    Struchiner, Claudio Jose
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2022, 56
  • [7] Academic publishing: Communication among editors, reviewers, publishers and authors. Publishing with fuel
    Suuberg, Eric
    Fu, Jinxia
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [8] AUTHORS, REVIEWERS, AND EDITORS
    JACOBSEN, E
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 71 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [9] LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
    Benlidayi, Ilke Coskun
    Gupta, Latika
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 39 (37)
  • [10] Authors, editors and reviewers
    Maughan, R
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2003, 21 (08) : 591 - 591