Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors

被引：64
|
作者：
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri [1 ,2 ]
Ayvazyan, Lilit [3 ]
Kitas, George D. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Russells Hall Hosp, Clin Res Unit, Dept Rheumatol, Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, England
[2] Russells Hall Hosp, Clin Res Unit, Dept Res & Dev, Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, England
[3] Yerevan State Med Univ, Dept Med Chem, Yerevan, Armenia
[4] Univ Manchester, Arthrit Res UK Epidemiol Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源：
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL | 2013年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词：
Authorship; Editorial policies; Periodicals as topic; Research standards; EQUAL CONTRIBUTIONS; BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS; GHOST AUTHORSHIP; HONORARY; PREVALENCE; CREDIT; CONTRIBUTORSHIP; PUBLICATIONS; PUBLISH; ORDER;
D O I：
10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
Authorship problems in scholarly journals shake the foundations of research, diminish scientific quality of papers and devalue records of citation tracking services. The 'Publish or Perish' mantra is thought to drive some instances of unfair, honorary authorship, particularly in countries of emerging scientific power. Though causes of honorary, gift, guest and ghost authorship are still ill-defined, it is possible to avoid some of these instances by improving awareness of what constitutes authorship and by adhering to the editorial policies of learned associations. This paper overviews common cases of inappropriate authorship and suggests options to solve related problems by authors, reviewers and editors of scholarly journals.
引用
收藏
页码：277 / 284
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2013, 33 : 277 - 284
  • [2] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    Heather Blackmore
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2011, 31
  • [3] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Blackmore, Heather
    Kitas, George D.
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (11) : 1409 - 1417
  • [4] Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Akazhanov, Nurbek A.
    Kitas, George D.
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (06) : 600 - 608
  • [5] Authors' and Editors' Perspectives on Peer Review Quality in Three Scholarly Nursing Journals
    Shattell, Mona M.
    Chinn, Peggy
    Thomas, Sandra P.
    Cowling, W. Richard, III
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2010, 42 (01) : 58 - 65
  • [6] Peer review ethics in Iranian LIS scholarly journals: a comparison between views of reviewers and authors
    Fattahi, Rahmatollah
    Beglou, Reza Rajabali
    Akhshik, Somayeh Sadat
    JLIS.IT, 2023, 14 (01): : 30 - 45
  • [7] Peer reviewers can meet journals' criteria for authorship
    Erren, Thomas C.
    Erren, Michael
    Shaw, David M.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [8] Guidelines for Use of Large Language Models by Authors, Reviewers, and Editors: Considerations for Imaging Journals
    Moy, Linda
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (01)
  • [9] Peer Review: Notes for Reviewers, Authors and Editors
    不详
    JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 31 (06)
  • [10] Ethics and Responsibilities of Peer Reviewers to the Authors, Readers, and Editors
    Min, Seung-Kee
    VASCULAR SPECIALIST INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 37 (01) : 1 - 3
12345