Populism and Psychological Involvement in the 2020 US Presidential Election

被引:0
|
作者
Mangum, Maruice [1 ]
机构
[1] Jackson State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Jackson, MS 39217 USA
关键词
candidate affect; Donald Trump; participation; political efficacy; populism; psychological involvement; United States; US presidential elections; vote choice; voter turnout; afecto por el candidato; alta participaci & oacute; n; elecci & oacute; n de voto; elecciones presidenciales; Estados Unidos; participaci & oacute; n electoral; n psicol & oacute; gica; populismo; (sic)(sic); (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic); (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic); (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic); POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE; DISCOURSE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/polp.70013
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In recent election cycles, especially during the 2020 US presidential election cycle, individuals displayed a renewed and heightened sense of civic, social, and political involvement. Voter turnout was high in the 2020 presidential election, the highest for any other presidential election since 1900. I submit that the psychological influences of populism and psychological involvement foster this high turnout. Using the 2020 American National Election Study, this article examines their influences on political behavior. It places greater focus on populism because scholars of American elections rarely test it as an individual-level force in presidential elections and because scholars do not examine it with psychological involvement simultaneously. I find that populism and psychological involvement are distinct concepts, both boost voter turnout, and they shape vote choice and candidate affect.Related ArticlesAguado, N. A. 2022. "When Charismatic Leadership Trumps Social Networking: Searching for the Effects of Social Media on Beliefs of Electoral Legitimacy." Politics & Policy 50, no. 5: 942-951. Craig, S. C., and J. Gainous. 2024. "To Vote or Not to Vote? Fake News, Voter Fraud, and Support for Postponing the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election." Politics & Policy 52, no. 1: 33-50. Deegan-Krause, K., and T. Haughton. 2009. "Toward a More Useful Conceptualization of Populism: Types and Degrees of Populist Appeals in the Case of Slovakia." Politics & Policy 37, no. 4: 821-841.Related ArticlesAguado, N. A. 2022. "When Charismatic Leadership Trumps Social Networking: Searching for the Effects of Social Media on Beliefs of Electoral Legitimacy." Politics & Policy 50, no. 5: 942-951. Craig, S. C., and J. Gainous. 2024. "To Vote or Not to Vote? Fake News, Voter Fraud, and Support for Postponing the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election." Politics & Policy 52, no. 1: 33-50. Deegan-Krause, K., and T. Haughton. 2009. "Toward a More Useful Conceptualization of Populism: Types and Degrees of Populist Appeals in the Case of Slovakia." Politics & Policy 37, no. 4: 821-841.Related ArticlesAguado, N. A. 2022. "When Charismatic Leadership Trumps Social Networking: Searching for the Effects of Social Media on Beliefs of Electoral Legitimacy." Politics & Policy 50, no. 5: 942-951. Craig, S. C., and J. Gainous. 2024. "To Vote or Not to Vote? Fake News, Voter Fraud, and Support for Postponing the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election." Politics & Policy 52, no. 1: 33-50. Deegan-Krause, K., and T. Haughton. 2009. "Toward a More Useful Conceptualization of Populism: Types and Degrees of Populist Appeals in the Case of Slovakia." Politics & Policy 37, no. 4: 821-841. En los ciclos electorales recientes, especialmente durante el ciclo electoral presidencial estadounidense de 2020, las personas mostraron un sentido renovado y elevado de participaci & oacute;n c & iacute;vica, social y pol & iacute;tica. La participaci & oacute;n electoral fue alta en las elecciones presidenciales de 2020, la m & aacute;s alta en cualquier otra elecci & oacute;n presidencial desde 1900. Sostengo que las influencias psicol & oacute;gicas del populismo y la participaci & oacute;n psicol & oacute;gica fomentan esta alta participaci & oacute;n. Utilizando el Estudio de las elecciones nacionales estadounidenses de 2020, este art & iacute;culo examina sus influencias en el comportamiento pol & iacute;tico. Pone mayor atenci & oacute;n en el populismo porque los estudiosos de las elecciones estadounidenses rara vez lo prueban como una fuerza a nivel individual en las elecciones presidenciales y porque los estudiosos no lo examinan simult & aacute;neamente con una implicaci & oacute;n psicol & oacute;gica. Encuentro que el populismo y la participaci & oacute;n psicol & oacute;gica son conceptos distintos, ambos aumentan la participaci & oacute;n electoral y moldean la elecci & oacute;n de voto y el afecto de los candidatos. (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic) 2020 (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic),(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic),(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic). 2020 (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic) 1900 (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic) 2020 (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)..
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Social norms misperception among voters in the 2020 US presidential election
    Hoerst, Carina
    Drury, John
    ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 21 (01) : 312 - 346
  • [32] Causal Judgment in the Wild: Evidence from the 2020 US Presidential Election
    Quillien, Tadeg
    Barlev, Michael
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2022, 46 (02)
  • [33] NETWORKED LINGUISTIC DATA AND DISCOURSE MANAGEMENT: THE 2020 US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
    Malysheva, Olga P.
    Ryabchenko, Natalia A.
    VESTNIK VOLGOGRADSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-SERIYA 2-YAZYKOZNANIE, 2022, 21 (03): : 39 - 53
  • [34] Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 US presidential election
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos, Shani
    Kaniasty, Krzysztof
    Hamama-Raz, Yaira
    Goodwin, Robin
    Ring, Lia
    Ben-Ezra, Menachem
    Mahat-Shamir, Michal
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 266 : 1 - 4
  • [35] CATHOLICS AND THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
    Smidt, Corwin
    POLITICS AND RELIGION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (02): : 283 - 312
  • [36] The 2020 Presidential Election Verdict
    Burden, Barry C.
    PRESIDENTIAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2021, 51 (02) : 244 - 272
  • [37] THE 2008 US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
    Super, Betsy
    SCOTTISH AFFAIRS, 2009, 66 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [38] US Presidential Election Forecasting
    Lewis-Beck, Michael S.
    Stegmaier, Mary
    PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2014, 47 (02) : 284 - 288
  • [39] Iraq and the US Presidential Election
    Yew, Lee Kuan
    FORBES, 2007, 179 (13): : 25 - 25
  • [40] The US presidential election, 1996
    Walker, M
    INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 1996, 72 (04) : 657 - 674