Social norms misperception among voters in the 2020 US presidential election

被引:3
|
作者
Hoerst, Carina [1 ]
Drury, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
关键词
social norms misperception; election; group differences; collective empowerment; collective narcissism; COLLECTIVE ACTION; IN-GROUP; PLURALISTIC IGNORANCE; ALCOHOL-USE; MODEL; CONSENSUS; IDENTITY; CONSEQUENCES; NARCISSISM; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1111/asap.12269
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
We aim to explain the dynamics enabling spikes in hate crimes by examining the underlying social-psychological processes behind it. We see these as captured in empowerment processes among racists who see themselves as "victims" and their position strengthened by majority support from the public for their actions. Building on previous research, we investigated the role social norm misperception (false consensus and pluralistic ignorance), following elections plays as a possible, generally occurring mechanism, with particular focus on Republican Party supporters. In a two-wave panel study, we surveyed Democrat and Republican supporters on social norms misperception, as well as collective empowerment, and xenophobic behavioral intentions. While we could replicate and strengthen our arguments and establish robust group-dependent effects for social norms misperception and illustrate that an unexpected outcome of the election led to disempowerment among Republicans, we found null effects for changes in social norms misperception, and behavioral intentions. Our study contributes to understanding social norms misperception as associated with group membership. Deriving from that, the study results indicate that the perception of a majority agreeing with one's approval is potentially less influenced by external factors, in contrast to feelings of joy and group efficacy-collective empowerment. Practical implications of group differences regarding post-election collective actions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 346
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thwarted voters at the 2000 US presidential election
    Pierce, R
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2004, 23 (04) : 601 - 621
  • [2] Whitewashing Women Voters: Intersectionality and Partisan Vote Choice in the 2020 US Presidential Election
    Kim, Chaerim
    Junn, Jane
    [J]. POLITICS & GENDER, 2024,
  • [3] Floating policy voters in the 2016 US presidential election
    Green, Jon
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2020, 67
  • [4] Acceptance, Use, and Influence of Political Technologies among Youth Voters in the 2008 US Presidential Election
    Khansa, Lara
    James, Tabitha
    Cook, Deborah F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-POLITICS, 2010, 1 (04) : 1 - 21
  • [5] Commentary: The 2020 US Presidential Election and Immigration
    Martin, Susan F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 2020, 58 (05) : 274 - 276
  • [6] Estimation of the 2020 US Presidential Election Competition and Election Stratagies
    Kim, Arthur
    Kim, Peter
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 10TH ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2019, : 1046 - 1050
  • [7] Impact of Sentiment Analysis for the 2020 US Presidential Election on Social Media Data
    Qorib, Miftahul
    Gizaw, Rahel S.
    Kim, Junwhan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2023 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, ICMLT 2023, 2023, : 28 - 34
  • [8] Motives, perceptions and voting intention of voters in the 2000 US presidential election
    Ben-Ur, J
    Newman, BI
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2002, 19 (12) : 1047 - 1065
  • [9] Metadehumanization erodes democratic norms during the 2020 presidential election
    Landry, Alexander P.
    Ihm, Elliott
    Kwit, Spencer
    Schooler, Jonathan W.
    [J]. ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 21 (01) : 51 - 63
  • [10] Democratic Norms, Social Projection, and False Consensus in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
    Weinschenk, Aaron C.
    Panagopoulos, Costas
    van der Linden, Sander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL MARKETING, 2021, 20 (3-4) : 255 - 268