US Abortion Bans and Fertility

被引:3
|
作者
Bell, Suzanne O. [1 ]
Franks, Alexander M. [2 ]
Arbour, David [3 ]
Anjur-Dietrich, Selena [1 ]
Stuart, Elizabeth A. [4 ]
Ben-Michael, Eli [5 ]
Feller, Avi [6 ]
Gemmill, Alison [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Stat & Appl Probabil, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Adobe Res, San Jose, CA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Heinz Coll Informat Syst & Publ Policy, Dept Stat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Goldman Sch Publ Policy, Dept Stat, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; RATES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2024.28527
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Abortion bans may lead to births among those who are unable to overcome barriers to abortion. The population-level effects of these policies, particularly their unequal impacts across subpopulations in the US, remain unclear. Objective To assess heterogeneity in the association of abortion bans with changes in fertility in the US, within and across states. Design, Setting, and Participants Drawing from birth certificate and US Census Bureau data from 2012 through 2023 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, this study used a bayesian panel data model to evaluate state-by-subgroup-specific changes in fertility associated with complete or 6-week abortion bans in 14 US states. The average percent and absolute change in the fertility rate among females aged 15 through 44 years was estimated overall and by state, and within and across states by age, race and ethnicity, marital status, education, and insurance payer. Exposure Complete or 6-week abortion ban. Main outcome and Measures Fertility rate (births per 1000 reproductive-aged females) overall and by subgroups. Results There were an estimated 1.01 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.45-1.64) additional births above expectation per 1000 females aged 15 through 44 years (reproductive age) in states following adoption of abortion bans (60.55 observed vs 59.54 expected; 1.70% increase; 95% CrI, 0.75%-2.78%), equivalent to 22 180 excess births, with evidence of variation by state and subgroup. Estimated differences above expectation were largest for racially minoritized individuals (approximate to 2.0%), unmarried individuals (1.79%), individuals younger than 35 years (approximate to 2.0%), Medicaid beneficiaries (2.41%), and those without college degrees (high school diploma, 2.36%; some college, 1.58%), particularly in southern states. Differences in race and ethnicity and education across states explain most of the variability in the state-level association between abortion bans and fertility rates. Conclusion and Relevance These findings provide evidence that fertility rates in states with abortion bans were higher than would have been expected in the absence of these policies, with the largest estimated differences among subpopulations experiencing the greatest structural disadvantages and in states with among the worst maternal and child health and well-being outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INTERPRETING MEDICAL EMERGENCY EXEMPTIONS IN TEXAS ABORTION BANS
    Arey, W.
    Moayedi, G.
    Lerma, K.
    White, K.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2023, 127 : 23 - 23
  • [32] Abortion Bans: The Exceptions That Prove the Rule Makes No Sense
    Browne, Tamara Kayali
    Kendal, Evie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FEMINIST APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS, 2024, 17 (02): : 114 - 122
  • [33] Abortion bans and implications for physician-patient trust
    Lagu, Tara
    DeJong, Christene
    Delk, Carolyn
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (06) : 499 - 501
  • [34] Restrictive State Abortion Bans-A Reproductive Injustice
    Wilkinson, Barbara
    Onwuzurike, Chiamaka
    Bartz, Deborah
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2022, 77 (09) : 515 - 517
  • [35] Our hands are tied: abortion bans and hesitant medicine
    Lilly, Anna -Grace
    Newman, Isabelle P.
    Bjork-James, Sophie
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2024, 350
  • [36] Abortion bans and their impacts A view from the United States
    Frye, Laura J.
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CELL REPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 4 (01)
  • [37] "I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the US
    Zia, Yasaman
    Somerson, Erica
    Folse, Connie
    Alvarez, Alejandra
    Davis, Kathryn Albergate
    Comfort, Alison B.
    Brown, Katherine
    Brandi, Kristyn
    Moayedi, Ghazaleh
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [38] BPA bans being banished in the US
    Murphy, Marina
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 2007, (10) : 5 - 5
  • [39] US BANS GENE PREJUDICE AT WORK
    不详
    NEW SCIENTIST, 1995, 146 (1974) : 4 - 4
  • [40] The Religious Exception to Abortion Bans: A Litigation Guide to State RFRAs
    Berman, Ari
    STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 2024, 76 (05) : 1129 - 1184