US Abortion Bans and Fertility

被引:3
|
作者
Bell, Suzanne O. [1 ]
Franks, Alexander M. [2 ]
Arbour, David [3 ]
Anjur-Dietrich, Selena [1 ]
Stuart, Elizabeth A. [4 ]
Ben-Michael, Eli [5 ]
Feller, Avi [6 ]
Gemmill, Alison [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Stat & Appl Probabil, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Adobe Res, San Jose, CA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Heinz Coll Informat Syst & Publ Policy, Dept Stat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Goldman Sch Publ Policy, Dept Stat, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; RATES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2024.28527
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Abortion bans may lead to births among those who are unable to overcome barriers to abortion. The population-level effects of these policies, particularly their unequal impacts across subpopulations in the US, remain unclear. Objective To assess heterogeneity in the association of abortion bans with changes in fertility in the US, within and across states. Design, Setting, and Participants Drawing from birth certificate and US Census Bureau data from 2012 through 2023 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, this study used a bayesian panel data model to evaluate state-by-subgroup-specific changes in fertility associated with complete or 6-week abortion bans in 14 US states. The average percent and absolute change in the fertility rate among females aged 15 through 44 years was estimated overall and by state, and within and across states by age, race and ethnicity, marital status, education, and insurance payer. Exposure Complete or 6-week abortion ban. Main outcome and Measures Fertility rate (births per 1000 reproductive-aged females) overall and by subgroups. Results There were an estimated 1.01 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.45-1.64) additional births above expectation per 1000 females aged 15 through 44 years (reproductive age) in states following adoption of abortion bans (60.55 observed vs 59.54 expected; 1.70% increase; 95% CrI, 0.75%-2.78%), equivalent to 22 180 excess births, with evidence of variation by state and subgroup. Estimated differences above expectation were largest for racially minoritized individuals (approximate to 2.0%), unmarried individuals (1.79%), individuals younger than 35 years (approximate to 2.0%), Medicaid beneficiaries (2.41%), and those without college degrees (high school diploma, 2.36%; some college, 1.58%), particularly in southern states. Differences in race and ethnicity and education across states explain most of the variability in the state-level association between abortion bans and fertility rates. Conclusion and Relevance These findings provide evidence that fertility rates in states with abortion bans were higher than would have been expected in the absence of these policies, with the largest estimated differences among subpopulations experiencing the greatest structural disadvantages and in states with among the worst maternal and child health and well-being outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Abortion bans in the USA harm health equity
    LANCET, 2021, 398 (10310): : 1461 - 1461
  • [22] Restrictive State Abortion Bans - A Reproductive Injustice
    Wilkinson, Barbara
    Onwuzurike, Chiamaka
    Bartz, Deborah
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 386 (13): : 1197 - 1199
  • [23] Whose Responsibility Is It to Define Exceptions in Abortion Bans?
    Shachar, Carmel
    Baruch, Susannah
    King, Louise P.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (07): : 559 - 560
  • [24] US challenges bans on GMOs
    不详
    TCE, 2003, (744): : 4 - 4
  • [25] US BANS SULFOXAFLOR PESTICIDE
    Erickson, Britt
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2015, 93 (46) : 6 - 6
  • [26] US abortion bans should not pre-empt the duty to provide life-saving abortion care to pregnant patients in medical emergencies
    Heisler, Michele
    Mitchell, Nia
    Arey, Whitney
    Erenberg, Michelle
    Torres, Karla
    Shah, Payal K.
    LANCET, 2024, 403 (10434): : 1318 - 1321
  • [27] US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans
    Sabbath, Erika L.
    McKetchnie, Samantha M.
    Arora, Kavita S.
    Buchbinder, Mara
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2024, 79 (07) : 389 - 391
  • [28] US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans
    Sabbath, Erika L.
    Mcketchnie, Samantha M.
    Arora, Kavita S.
    Buchbinder, Mara
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (01) : E2352109
  • [29] Abortion and fertility regulation
    Kulczycki, A
    Potts, M
    Rosenfield, A
    LANCET, 1996, 347 (9016): : 1663 - 1668
  • [30] Abortion and fertility regulation
    Rubiales, AS
    LANCET, 1996, 348 (9025): : 478 - 478