Computed tomography image quality in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma: intraindividual comparison of contrast agent concentrations

被引:0
|
作者
Peng, Fei [1 ]
Luo, Chaotian [1 ]
Ning, Xiaojing [1 ]
Xiao, Fangyan [1 ]
Guan, Kaiming [1 ]
Tang, Cheng [1 ]
Huang, Fuling [1 ]
Liang, Junli [1 ]
Peng, Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanning, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
contrast agent; iodine concentration; hepatocellular carcinoma; comparative study; computed tomography; IODINE CONCENTRATIONS; ENHANCEMENT; MEDIA; LIVER; CT; ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1460505
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of the different concentrations of iodine contrast agents used on the quality of computed tomography (CT) images obtained intraindividually in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from a cohort of 29 patients diagnosed with primary hepatocellular carcinoma who had undergone two preoperative CT-enhanced examinations within a 3-month timeframe were analyzed. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive either a low-concentration contrast agent (300 mg I/mL iohexol) or a high-concentration contrast agent (350 mg I/mL iohexol) for the first scan and the alternative contrast agent for the second scan. CT images of different liver regions of each patient were compared between low-and high-concentration scans using their before-and-after control design. Subjective image quality scores for portal vein images were also assessed. Results: The findings of this study indicate that patients in the high-concentration group presented significantly elevated CT values across various anatomical regions, including the liver parenchyma, abdominal aorta, and hepatic portal vein, compared to those in the low-concentration group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the high-concentration group demonstrated superior subjective image ratings (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the CT values observed in liver cancer parenchyma scans at different phases between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In summary, using a high-concentration iodine contrast agent is efficient in enhancing the visual clarity of the liver parenchyma, the aorta, and the portal vein in individuals diagnosed with primary hepatocellular carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of volume perfusion computed tomography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for assessment of therapeutic effect of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Schulze, Maximilian
    Spira, Daniel
    Horger, Marius
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [42] Image Fusion in Dual Energy Computed Tomography Effect on Contrast Enhancement, Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Image Quality in Computed Tomography Angiography
    Behrendt, Florian F.
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Plumhans, Cedric
    Keil, Sebastian
    Woodruff, Seth G.
    Ackermann, Diana
    Muehlenbruch, Georg
    Flohr, Thomas
    Guenther, Rolf W.
    Mahnken, Andreas H.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2009, 44 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [43] Intraindividual Evaluation of the Influence of Iterative Reconstruction and Filter Kernel on Subjective and Objective Image Quality in Computed Tomography of the Brain
    Buhk, J. H.
    Laqmani, A.
    von Schultzendorff, H. C.
    Hammerle, D.
    Sehner, S.
    Adam, G.
    Fiehler, J.
    Nagel, H. D.
    Regier, M.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2013, 185 (08): : 741 - 748
  • [44] Dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography with ultra-low dose contrast administration: Comparison of image quality with standard computed tomography pulmonary angiography
    Celtikci, Pinar
    Hekimoglu, Koray
    Kahraman, Gokhan
    Haberal, Kemal Murat
    Kilic, Dalokay
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 30 (04): : 549 - 556
  • [45] Contrast Enhancement in Chest Multidetector Computed Tomography: Intraindividual Comparison of 300 mg/ml versus 400 mg/ml Iodinated Contrast Medium
    Behrendt, Florian F.
    Plumhans, Cedric
    Keil, Sebastian
    Muehlenbruch, Georg
    Das, Marco
    Seidensticker, Peter
    Mutscher, Christina
    Guenther, Rolf W.
    Mahnken, Andreas H.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (02) : 144 - 149
  • [46] Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma in dialysis patients Comparison with computed tomography
    Hashimoto, Masahiro
    Ohkuma, Kiyoshi
    Akita, Hirotaka
    Yamada, Yoshitake
    Nakatsuka, Seishi
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Oya, Mototsugu
    Jinzaki, Masahiro
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (47)
  • [47] Acute nephropathy after contrast agent administration for computed tomography perfusion and computed tomography angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke
    Luitse, Merel J. A.
    Dauwan, Meenakshi
    van Seeters, Tom
    Horsch, Alexander D.
    Niesten, Joris M.
    Kappelle, L. Jaap
    Biessels, Geert Jan
    Velthuis, Birgitta K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2015, 10 (04) : E35 - E36
  • [48] Evaluation of Local Recurrence After Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Using Sonazoid: Comparison with Dynamic Computed Tomography
    Shiozawa, Kazue
    Watanabe, Manabu
    Takayama, Ryuji
    Takahashi, Masayoshi
    Wakui, Noritaka
    Iida, Kazunari
    Sumino, Yasukiyo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2010, 38 (04) : 182 - 189
  • [49] Evaluation of tumor response to intra-arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with multiphase computed tomography
    Paul, S. B.
    Dhamija, E.
    Gamanagatti, S. R.
    Sreenivas, V.
    Yadav, D. P.
    Jain, S.
    Shalimara
    Acharya, S. K.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (03) : 253 - 260
  • [50] ROLE OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN SCREENING FOR HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS
    HENDERSON, JM
    CAMPBELL, JD
    OLSON, R
    NELSON, RC
    GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 13 (02): : 129 - 134