Prospective Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Diffractive Trifocal Extended Depth-of-Focus and Diffractive Trifocal Hydrophobic Intraocular Lenses

被引:0
|
作者
Nagy, Zoltan Z. [1 ]
Dorman, Peter [1 ]
Szalczer, Szilard [1 ]
Kiss, Huba [1 ]
机构
[1] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Maria Utca 39, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
PATIENT SATISFACTION; REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; VISUAL OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE; IOLS; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; QUALITY; DESIGN; LASIK;
D O I
10.3928/1081597X-20241113-01
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes for patients implanted with either FineVision HP or FineVision Triumf intraocular lenses (IOL) (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc) following cataract surgery. METHODS: Twenty-six patients bilaterally implanted with the HP IOL and 27 patients with the Triumf IOL were followed up for 6 months in a prospective randomized study. Refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), and uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were evaluated. Defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were also measured. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25, and adverse events were registered. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of the eyes in both groups were within +/- 1.00 diopter (D) of spherical equivalent. All of the patients had 20/20 or better binocular CDVA in both groups and 96% and 100% had 20/25 or better binocular CDIVA in the Triumf and HP IOL groups, respectively, being reduced to 32% and 91.7% for DCNVA, respectively. Differences between groups were statistically significant from-2.00 to-4.50 D with better visual acuity outcomes for the HP IOL group (P < .01). Better monocular photopic contrast sensitivity was found for the Triumf IOL group at 12 and 18 cycles per degree (P < .01). There was a statistically significant increase of the overall composite score in both groups before and after surgery (P < .001). Spectacle independence was similar between groups for distance and intermediate vision but higher for the HP IOL for near vision (96% versus 75%). There were no adverse events related to the IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: Both IOLs showed good and comparable distance and intermediate visual acuities but near vision was better for the HP IOL. This model provided higher spectacle independence for near vision.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Outcomes of Patients Fitted with Bifocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses
    Seo, Jeong Gi
    Choi, Moon Jung
    Seo, Kyoung Yul
    Kim, Eung Kweon
    Kim, Tae Im
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 59 (04): : 325 - 331
  • [22] Clinical outcomes with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens
    Alio, Jorge L.
    Plaza-Puche, Ana B.
    Alio del Barrio, Jorge L.
    Amat-Peral, Pedro
    Ortuno, Vicente
    Yebana, Pilar
    Al-Shymali, Olena
    Vega-Estrada, Alfredo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 28 (04) : 419 - 424
  • [23] Clinical outcome comparison: bilateral trifocal vs. mix-match extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lenses
    Acar, Banu
    Nurozler Tabakci, Burcu
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 41 (11) : 3675 - 3686
  • [24] Three Month Outcomes After Bilateral Mix-and-match Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Lim, Hyunah
    Lee, Ko Eun
    Jang, Joon Hyuck
    Nam, Sanghyu
    Lee, Hun
    Tchah, Hungwon
    Kim, Jae Yong
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [25] Clinical outcomes of a hydrophobic trifocal diffractive intraocular lens: a literature review
    Ristvedt, Deborah
    Bosc, Camille
    Thompson, Vance
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [26] Comparison of visual performance between diffractive bifocal and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses
    Junya Kawamura
    Hirotaka Tanabe
    Tomohiro Shojo
    Tomofusa Yamauchi
    Kosuke Takase
    Hitoshi Tabuchi
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [27] Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision and trifocal intraocular lenses
    Ruiz-Mesa, Ramon
    Abengozar-Vela, Antonio
    Aramburu, Ana
    Ruiz-Santos, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 460 - 465
  • [28] Comparison of visual performance between diffractive bifocal and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses
    Kawamura, Junya
    Tanabe, Hirotaka
    Shojo, Tomohiro
    Yamauchi, Tomofusa
    Takase, Kosuke
    Tabuchi, Hitoshi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [29] Visual Outcomes Following Bilateral Implantation of Two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in 10 084 Eyes
    Bilbao-Calabuig, Rafael
    Llovet-Rausell, Andrea
    Ortega-Usobiaga, Julio
    Martinez-del-Pozo, Mercedes
    Mayordomo-Cerda, Fernando
    Segura-Albentosa, Celia
    Baviera, Julio
    Llovet-Osuna, Fernando
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 179 : 55 - 66
  • [30] Outcomes after implantation of a trifocal diffractive IOL
    Lesieur, G.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2012, 35 (05): : 338 - 342