Enhancing seafood processing wastewater treatment efficiency of an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) system: a comparison of post-treatment methods

被引:0
|
作者
Luu, Tran Le [1 ]
Duy, Ho Nguyen Anh [1 ]
Hang, Tran Thi Thai [1 ]
Nguyet, Phan Nhu [2 ]
Thanh, Bui Xuan [3 ,4 ]
Tuyen, Nguyen Van [5 ]
Thuan, Tran Hung [5 ]
Quang, Chu Xuan [5 ]
机构
[1] Vietnamese German Univ, Master program Water Technol Reuse & Management, Ben Cat, Binh Duong, Vietnam
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ Ho Chi Minh City, Univ Sci, Fac Environm, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Ho Chi Minh City Univ Technol HCMUT, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet St, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Vietnam Natl Univ Ho Chi Minh City VNU HCM, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
[5] Natl Ctr Technol Progress, Ctr Adv Mat & Environm Technol, Hanoi, Vietnam
来源
GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL | 2024年 / 26卷 / 09期
关键词
Post treatment; seafood processing wastewater; anaerobic membrane bioreactor; chlorine; polyaluminium chloride; granular activated carbon; ADSORPTION; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.30955/gnj.06376
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) was applied for treating wastewater of a seafood processing factory in Vietnam. However, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Phosphorus (TP), and Total Nitrogen (TN) values of the AnMBR effluent were 250.43 mg/l, 19.96 mg/l, and 62.65 mg/l, respectively, and were about two times higher than the technical regulation for seafood processing wastewater in Vietnam. AnMBR needs to be combined with other posttreatment processes to ensure that treated water can meet the technical regulation. Therefore, current research has tested various advanced post-treatment methods for AnMBR effluent including chlorine, poly aluminum chloride (PAC) combined with anionic polymer, and granular activated carbon (GAC). Different concentrations of the above chemicals and reaction times were tested to select the appropriate post-treatment method. The results showed that chlorine had the lowest treatment efficiency for all four parameters (Total suspended solids -TSS, COD, TP, and TN). GAC was more effective than PAC in treatment of TN and TSS. Besides, GAC with a concentration of 5000 mg/L and a reaction time of 60 minutes brought the highest TSS, COD, TP, and TN treatment efficiency with 94.04, 79.11; 86.19, and 71.23%. This implies that GAC is the suitable method for the post-treatment of AnMBR seafood processing effluent.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anaerobic Fluidized Bed Membrane Bioreactor for Wastewater Treatment
    Kim, Jeonghwan
    Kim, Kihyun
    Ye, Hyoungyoung
    Lee, Eunyoung
    Shin, Chungheon
    McCarty, Perry L.
    Bae, Jaeho
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (02) : 576 - 581
  • [42] Progress of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor in Municipal Wastewater Treatment
    Shen, Yongrong
    Sun, Pingping
    Ye, Liang
    Xu, Dong
    SCIENCE OF ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2023, 15 (10) : 1277 - 1298
  • [43] Virus removal during sewage treatment by anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR): The role of membrane fouling
    Zhang, Jinfan
    Wu, Baolei
    Zhang, Jie
    Zhai, Xuanyu
    Liu, Zhendong
    Yang, Qiqi
    Liu, Huan
    Hou, Zhaoyang
    Sano, Daisuke
    Chen, Rong
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 211
  • [44] Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) for the Treatment of Cheese Whey for the Potential Recovery of Water and Energy
    Ribera-Pi, Judit
    Badia-Fabregat, Marina
    Calderer, Montse
    Polaskova, Martina
    Svojitka, Jan
    Rovira, Miguel
    Jubany, Irene
    Martinez-Llado, Xavier
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2020, 11 (05) : 1821 - 1835
  • [45] Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) for the Treatment of Cheese Whey for the Potential Recovery of Water and Energy
    Judit Ribera-Pi
    Marina Badia-Fabregat
    Montse Calderer
    Martina Polášková
    Jan Svojitka
    Miquel Rovira
    Irene Jubany
    Xavier Martínez-Lladó
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2020, 11 : 1821 - 1835
  • [46] Comparison of membrane bioreactor systems in wastewater treatment
    Guo, W. S.
    Vigneswaran, S.
    Ngo, H. H.
    Xing, W.
    DESALINATION, 2008, 231 (1-3) : 61 - 70
  • [47] Evaluation of a membrane bioreactor system as post-treatment in waste water treatment for better removal of micropollutants
    Arriaga, Sonia
    de Jonge, Nadieh
    Nielsen, Marc Lund
    Andersen, Henrik Rasmus
    Borregaard, Vibeke
    Jewel, Kevin
    Ternes, Thomas A.
    Nielsen, Jeppe Lund
    WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 107 : 37 - 46
  • [48] Formation of dynamic membrane in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment
    Zhang, Xinying
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Wu, Zhichao
    Lu, Fenghai
    Tong, Jun
    Zang, Lili
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2010, 165 (01) : 175 - 183
  • [49] Long-term operation of a pilot scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for the treatment of municipal wastewater under psychrophilic conditions
    Gouveia, J.
    Plaza, F.
    Garralon, G.
    Fdz-Polanco, F.
    Pena, M.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 185 : 225 - 233
  • [50] Anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for wastewater treatment: A review
    Hu, Yisong
    Wang, Xiaochang C.
    Ngo, Huu Hao
    Sun, Qiyuan
    Yang, Yuan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 247 : 1107 - 1118