Second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on RCT

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Chengyu [1 ]
Fan, Enguo [2 ]
Huang, Luqiao [1 ]
Zhang, Zhengguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Xuzhou Cent Hosp, Affiliated Xuzhou Clin Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Inst Basic Med Sci, Sch Basic Med,Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Microbiol & Parasitol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 12期
关键词
RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; CETUXIMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN; KRAS WILD-TYPE; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE-2; DOUBLE-BLIND; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; FLUOROURACIL FAILURE; LEUCOVORIN FOLFIRI; MODIFIED FOLFOX-6; 1ST-LINE THERAPY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0313278
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The optimal second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is inconclusive.Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing second-line systemic treatments for mCRC from the inception of each database up to February 3, 2024. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique was used in this network meta-analysis (NMA) to generate the direct and indirect comparison results among multiple treatments in progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), grade 3 and above adverse events (Grade >= 3AE), and any adverse events (Any AE). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was adopted to evaluate the probability of each treatment being the optimum intervention. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the RAS gene status.Results A total of 47 randomized controlled trials were included, involving 16,925 patients and 44 second-line systemic treatments. In improving OS, FOLFOX + Bevacizumab + Erlotinib exhibited significant superiority (SUCRA:92.7%). In improving PFS, Irinotecan + CMAB009 (SUCRA:86.4%) had advantages over other treatments. FOLFIRI + Trebananib (SUCRA:88.1%) had a significant advantage in improving ORR. Among multiple second-line treatments, the SUCRA values of FOLFOX + Bevacizumab in PFS, OS, ORR, and PR were 83.4%, 74.0%, 81.1%, and 86.1%, respectively, and the safety was not significantly different from other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab + panitumumab ranked among the top in survival outcomes in the RAS-mutant population (OS SUCRA: 87.9%; PFS SUCRA: 70.2%); whereas in the RAS-wild-type population, FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab significantly improved survival outcomes (OS SUCRA: 73.2%; PFS SUCRA: 65.1%).Conclusion For most people, FOLFOX + Bevacizumab may be the best second-line systemic treatment regimen for mCRC. For RAS-mutant populations, FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab + Panitumumab is recommended. However, the therapeutic effect may be affected by the patient's physiological state, and clinicians should apply it based on actual conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression: Successful second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori
    Munoz, Neus
    Sanchez-Delgado, Jordi
    Baylina, Mireia
    Puig, Ignasi
    Lopez-Gongora, Sheila
    Suarez, David
    Calvet, Xavier
    HELICOBACTER, 2018, 23 (03)
  • [42] Safety and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan as the second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Brian Shiian
    Chan, Shu-Yen
    Bteich, Fernand
    Kuang, Chaoyuan
    Meyerhardt, Jeffery A.
    Ma, Kevin Sheng-Kai
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 201
  • [43] Relative efficacy of interventions in the treatment of second-line non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Adrian D. Vickers
    Katherine B. Winfree
    Gebra Cuyun Carter
    Urpo Kiiskinen
    Min-Hua Jen
    Donald Stull
    James A. Kaye
    David P. Carbone
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [44] Relative efficacy of interventions in the treatment of second-line non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Vickers, Adrian D.
    Winfree, Katherine B.
    Carter, Gebra Cuyun
    Kiiskinen, Urpo
    Jen, Min-Hua
    Stull, Donald
    Kaye, James A.
    Carbone, David P.
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [45] Everolimus and temsirolimus are not the same second-line in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zahra Goudarzi
    Mehrdad Mostafavi
    Mahmood Salesi
    Mojtaba Jafari
    Iman Mirian
    Amir Hashemi Meshkini
    Khosro Keshavarz
    Younes Ghasemi
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 21
  • [46] Everolimus and temsirolimus are not the same second-line in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Goudarzi, Zahra
    Mostafavi, Mehrdad
    Salesi, Mahmood
    Jafari, Mojtaba
    Mirian, Iman
    Hashemi Meshkini, Amir
    Keshavarz, Khosro
    Ghasemi, Younes
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [47] Sacituzumab Govitecan as a Second-Line Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kathpalia, Meghavi
    Sharma, Anurag
    Kaur, Navkiran
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 58 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [48] Efficacy of second-line agents for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perletti, Gianpaolo
    Monti, Elena
    Vral, Anne
    Cleves, Anne
    Magri, Vittorio
    Trinchieri, Alberto
    Rennie, Paul S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 36 : S53 - S53
  • [49] Maintenance strategies after anti-EGFR-based induction in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis
    Mastrantoni, Luca
    Beccia, Viria
    Caira, Giulia
    Trovato, Giovanni
    Calegari, Maria Alessandra
    Basso, Michele
    Salvatore, Lisa
    Pozzo, Carmelo
    Tortora, Giampaolo
    Bria, Emilio
    Orlandi, Armando
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 191
  • [50] A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs: The effect of systemic immunotherapies on treatment outcomes and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Zhu, Yiying
    Fu, Xiangwei
    Dai, Yonggang
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2025,