Second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on RCT

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Chengyu [1 ]
Fan, Enguo [2 ]
Huang, Luqiao [1 ]
Zhang, Zhengguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Xuzhou Cent Hosp, Affiliated Xuzhou Clin Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Inst Basic Med Sci, Sch Basic Med,Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Microbiol & Parasitol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 12期
关键词
RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; CETUXIMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN; KRAS WILD-TYPE; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE-2; DOUBLE-BLIND; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; FLUOROURACIL FAILURE; LEUCOVORIN FOLFIRI; MODIFIED FOLFOX-6; 1ST-LINE THERAPY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0313278
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The optimal second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is inconclusive.Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing second-line systemic treatments for mCRC from the inception of each database up to February 3, 2024. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique was used in this network meta-analysis (NMA) to generate the direct and indirect comparison results among multiple treatments in progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), grade 3 and above adverse events (Grade >= 3AE), and any adverse events (Any AE). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was adopted to evaluate the probability of each treatment being the optimum intervention. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the RAS gene status.Results A total of 47 randomized controlled trials were included, involving 16,925 patients and 44 second-line systemic treatments. In improving OS, FOLFOX + Bevacizumab + Erlotinib exhibited significant superiority (SUCRA:92.7%). In improving PFS, Irinotecan + CMAB009 (SUCRA:86.4%) had advantages over other treatments. FOLFIRI + Trebananib (SUCRA:88.1%) had a significant advantage in improving ORR. Among multiple second-line treatments, the SUCRA values of FOLFOX + Bevacizumab in PFS, OS, ORR, and PR were 83.4%, 74.0%, 81.1%, and 86.1%, respectively, and the safety was not significantly different from other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab + panitumumab ranked among the top in survival outcomes in the RAS-mutant population (OS SUCRA: 87.9%; PFS SUCRA: 70.2%); whereas in the RAS-wild-type population, FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab significantly improved survival outcomes (OS SUCRA: 73.2%; PFS SUCRA: 65.1%).Conclusion For most people, FOLFOX + Bevacizumab may be the best second-line systemic treatment regimen for mCRC. For RAS-mutant populations, FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab + Panitumumab is recommended. However, the therapeutic effect may be affected by the patient's physiological state, and clinicians should apply it based on actual conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A systematic review and network meta-analysis of second-line therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Delos Santos, S.
    Udayakumar, S.
    Nguyen, A.
    Ko, Y. J.
    Berry, S.
    Doherty, M.
    Chan, K. K. W.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 300 - 306
  • [22] Efficacy of second-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: a systemic review and network meta-analysis
    Chang, Yen-Lin
    Tung, Yu-Chun
    Tu, Yu-Kang
    Yeh, Hong-Zen
    Yang, Jyh-Chin
    Hsu, Ping-, I
    Kim, Sung-Eun
    Wu, Ming-Fen
    Liou, Wen-Shyong
    Shiu, Sz-Iuan
    BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [23] A systematic review and meta-analysis of second-line immunosuppressants for autoimmune hepatitis treatment
    De Lemos-Bonotto, Michele
    Valle-Tovo, Cristiane
    Costabeber, Ane M.
    Mattos, Angelo A.
    Azeredo-da-Silva, Andre L. F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 30 (02) : 212 - 216
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of regorafenib as beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an adjusted indirect meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wu, Yinying
    Fan, Yangwei
    Dong, Danfeng
    Dong, Xuyuan
    Hu, Yuan
    Shi, Yu
    Jing, Jiayu
    Li, Enxiao
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [25] The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Hwang, Inhwan
    Han, Sangah
    Jeong, Ji Hun
    Ihm, Chunhwa
    Rhee, Taeho Greg
    Shim, Sung Ryul
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2025,
  • [26] Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Arnold, D.
    Prager, G. W.
    Quintela, A.
    Stein, A.
    Vera, S. Moreno
    Mounedji, N.
    Taieb, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (04) : 835 - 856
  • [27] Options for Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Lee, James J.
    Sun, Weijing
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [28] Second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Rougier, P
    Lepere, C
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2005, 32 (06) : S48 - S54
  • [29] Second-Line Systemic Treatment for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials
    Yoon, Hyun Sik
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Kim, Hyung Suk
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in combination with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis
    Xie, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Hu, Huabin
    Cai, Yue
    Wu, Zehua
    Ling, Jiayu
    Li, Weiwei
    Deng, Yanhong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04)