Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Risk Comparison between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Artery Stenting with Distal Embolic Protection

被引:0
|
作者
Chow, Christopher Y. [1 ]
Kang, Naixin [1 ]
Kenel-Pierre, Stefan [1 ]
Gonzalez, Kathy [1 ]
Sussman, Matthew [1 ]
Rey, Jorge [1 ]
Velazquez, Omaida C. [1 ]
Bornak, Arash [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Vasc & Endovascular Surg, Miami, FL USA
关键词
ENDARTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.064
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a rare but serious complication after carotid artery revascularization. This study aims to determine the impact of carotid artery stenting (CAS) modality on the incidence, severity, and overall outcomes of CHS after carotid revascularization. Methods: Data from patients who underwent CAS with either distal embolic protection (CAS + DEP) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database through the years 2016-2023. Cases without embolic protection device and patients suffering from carotid dissection, trauma, or fibromuscular dysplasia were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified into asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups and then further reviewed based on the urgency of their revascularization. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CHS after revascularization. A subgroup analysis was then performed, evaluating postprocedural outcomes and severity of CHS. Lastly, patients with CHS were further analyzed according to the severity of their stroke on admission using the Results: In this analysis, a total of 69,480 (57.47% TCAR; 42.53% CAS + DEP) patients were included. Postprocedural CHS was lower in the TCAR cohort compared to the CAS + DEP cohort (0.53% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, TCAR was associated with lower risk of CHS than CAS + DEP (P < 0.001). When considering only asymptomatic patients, revascularization modality did not significantly affect CHS occurrence (P - 0.610). However, in symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with 2-fold lower risk of CHS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001), in both elective (P - 0.003), and urgent/emergency cases (P < 0.001). Among patients who developed CHS, those undergoing TCAR had decreased in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.94, P - 0.031) and at 30 days (aOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P - 0.006). TCAR patients with CHS also had a shorter length of hospitalization (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92, P - 0.022) and suffered less frequently from severe CHS with seizures and intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, P - 0.019). Patients undergoing CAS + DEP who were admitted with severe stroke (Modified Conclusion: In patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, TCAR is associated with a dergo TCAR express a milder form of CHS and have lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality than those treated with CAS + DEP.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Feasibility of Carotid Artery Stenting with Double Cerebral Embolic Protection in High-Risk Patients
    Varbella, Ferdinando
    Gagnor, Andrea
    Rolfo, Cristina
    Cerrato, Enrico
    Bollati, Mario
    Pron, Paolo Giay
    Hartwig, Massimo
    Restrepo, Sara Palacio
    Reggiani, Monica
    Amaru, Salvatore
    di Cortemiglia, Emilio Luda
    Tomassini, Francesco
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (03) : 432 - 437
  • [32] Learning curve and proficiency of transcarotid artery revascularization compared to transfemoral carotid artery stenting
    Kumins, Norman H.
    Kashyap, Vikram S.
    SEMINARS IN VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 33 (1-2) : 16 - 23
  • [33] Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Is Anatomically Feasible in the Majority of Patients Eligible for Carotid Artery Stenting
    Ambani, Ravi N.
    King, Alexander H.
    Thomas, Jones P.
    Kashyap, Vikram S.
    Kumins, Norman H.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (03) : E75 - E75
  • [34] Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome resulting in subarachnoid hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting
    Makoto Isozaki
    Yoshikazu Arai
    Yoshifumi Higashino
    Hidehiko Okazawa
    Ken-ichiro Kikuta
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2016, 30 : 669 - 674
  • [35] Intraprocedural Prediction of Hemorrhagic Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Artery Stenting
    Narita, Sumito
    Aikawa, Hiroshi
    Nagata, Shun-ichi
    Tsutsumi, Masanori
    Nii, Kouhei
    Yoshida, Hidenori
    Matsumoto, Yoshihisa
    Hamaguchi, Shuko
    Etoh, Hosei
    Sakamoto, Kimiya
    Inoue, Ritsuro
    Kazekawa, Kiyoshi
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 22 (05): : 615 - 619
  • [36] Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome resulting in subarachnoid hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting
    Isozaki, Makoto
    Arai, Yoshikazu
    Higashino, Yoshifumi
    Okazawa, Hidehiko
    Kikuta, Ken-ichiro
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 30 (09) : 669 - 674
  • [37] Transcarotid artery revascularization versus carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral stenting in octogenarians
    Mehta, Ambar
    Patel, Priya B.
    Bajakian, Danielle
    Schutzer, Richard
    Morrissey, Nicholas
    Malas, Mahmoud
    Schermerhorn, Marc
    Patel, Virendra I.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (05) : 1602 - 1608
  • [38] Vasoconstriction and hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting
    Kobayashi, Yuya
    Morizumi, Teruya
    Okumura, Gaku
    Nagamatsu, Kiyoshiro
    Shimizu, Yusaku
    Sasaki, Tetsuo
    Sato, Atsushi
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 58 (01):
  • [39] Hyperperfusion syndrome following internal carotid artery stenting
    Erden, Ismail
    Pamuk, Gulsun
    Akinci, Seda
    Uzun, Sennur
    Koseoglu, Ayhan
    Aypar, Ulku
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 : S3 - S3
  • [40] Vasoconstriction and hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting
    Yuya Kobayashi
    Teruya Morizumi
    Gaku Okumura
    Kiyoshiro Nagamatsu
    Yusaku Shimizu
    Tetsuo Sasaki
    Atsushi Sato
    The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 58