Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Risk Comparison between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Artery Stenting with Distal Embolic Protection

被引:0
|
作者
Chow, Christopher Y. [1 ]
Kang, Naixin [1 ]
Kenel-Pierre, Stefan [1 ]
Gonzalez, Kathy [1 ]
Sussman, Matthew [1 ]
Rey, Jorge [1 ]
Velazquez, Omaida C. [1 ]
Bornak, Arash [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Vasc & Endovascular Surg, Miami, FL USA
关键词
ENDARTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.064
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a rare but serious complication after carotid artery revascularization. This study aims to determine the impact of carotid artery stenting (CAS) modality on the incidence, severity, and overall outcomes of CHS after carotid revascularization. Methods: Data from patients who underwent CAS with either distal embolic protection (CAS + DEP) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database through the years 2016-2023. Cases without embolic protection device and patients suffering from carotid dissection, trauma, or fibromuscular dysplasia were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified into asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups and then further reviewed based on the urgency of their revascularization. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CHS after revascularization. A subgroup analysis was then performed, evaluating postprocedural outcomes and severity of CHS. Lastly, patients with CHS were further analyzed according to the severity of their stroke on admission using the Results: In this analysis, a total of 69,480 (57.47% TCAR; 42.53% CAS + DEP) patients were included. Postprocedural CHS was lower in the TCAR cohort compared to the CAS + DEP cohort (0.53% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, TCAR was associated with lower risk of CHS than CAS + DEP (P < 0.001). When considering only asymptomatic patients, revascularization modality did not significantly affect CHS occurrence (P - 0.610). However, in symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with 2-fold lower risk of CHS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001), in both elective (P - 0.003), and urgent/emergency cases (P < 0.001). Among patients who developed CHS, those undergoing TCAR had decreased in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.94, P - 0.031) and at 30 days (aOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P - 0.006). TCAR patients with CHS also had a shorter length of hospitalization (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92, P - 0.022) and suffered less frequently from severe CHS with seizures and intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, P - 0.019). Patients undergoing CAS + DEP who were admitted with severe stroke (Modified Conclusion: In patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, TCAR is associated with a dergo TCAR express a milder form of CHS and have lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality than those treated with CAS + DEP.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Carotid Artery Stenting with Double Cerebral Embolic Protection in Symptomatic Patients
    Varbella, Ferdinando
    Tomassini, Francesco
    Gagnor, Andrea
    Gambino, Alfonso
    Pron, Paolo Giay
    Hartwig, Massimo
    Reggiani, Monica
    Amaru, Salvatore
    di Cortemiglia, Emilio Luda
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (11) : B163 - B163
  • [22] Age and Outcomes After Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting, and Carotid Endarterectomy
    Aridi, Hanaa Dakour
    Kashyap, Vikram S.
    Wang, Grace J.
    Jorgensen, Jens
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (06) : E60 - E61
  • [23] Embolic protection for carotid artery stenting - A 'no brainer'
    Aronow, HD
    Yadav, JS
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2004, 104 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [24] Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial
    Matsumura, Jon S.
    Gray, William
    Chaturvedi, Seemant
    Yamanouchi, Dai
    Peng, Lei
    Verta, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 55 (04) : 968 - 977
  • [25] Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices?
    Zahn, R
    Mark, B
    Zeymer, U
    Niedermaier, N
    Von Leitner, E
    Ischinger, T
    Senges, J
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 204 - 204
  • [26] Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting - Is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices?
    Zahn, R
    Ischinger, T
    Mark, B
    Gass, S
    Zeymer, U
    Schmalz, W
    Haerten, K
    Hauptmann, KE
    von Leitner, ER
    Kasper, W
    Tebbe, U
    Senges, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (11) : 1769 - 1774
  • [27] Long-term outcome of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection
    Andersen, G.
    Azzari, F.
    Luduena, S.
    Chambre, D.
    Schipani, G.
    Fernandez, A.
    Brieva, S.
    Torresani, E.
    Bertoni, H.
    Leguizamon, J.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (12) : E327 - E328
  • [28] Neurosonological Parameters May Predict the Risk of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Artery Stenting
    Xu, Min
    Yan, Peng
    Zhao, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Hailing
    Sun, Qinjian
    Du, Yifeng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 187 : E77 - E85
  • [29] In Reply: Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting Without Distal Embolic Protection Devices
    Binning, Mandy J.
    Veznedaroglu, Erol
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (06) : E274 - E274
  • [30] Nationwide Questionnaire Survey of Carotid Artery Stenting for Patients at High Risk for Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome
    Hayakawa, Mikito
    Matsumaru, Yuji
    Sakai, Nobuyuki
    Yamagami, Hiroshi
    Iihara, Koji
    Ogasawara, Kuniaki
    Oishi, Hidenori
    Ito, Yasushi
    Sugiu, Kenji
    Yoshimura, Shinichi
    STROKE, 2016, 47