Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Risk Comparison between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Artery Stenting with Distal Embolic Protection

被引:0
|
作者
Chow, Christopher Y. [1 ]
Kang, Naixin [1 ]
Kenel-Pierre, Stefan [1 ]
Gonzalez, Kathy [1 ]
Sussman, Matthew [1 ]
Rey, Jorge [1 ]
Velazquez, Omaida C. [1 ]
Bornak, Arash [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Vasc & Endovascular Surg, Miami, FL USA
关键词
ENDARTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.064
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a rare but serious complication after carotid artery revascularization. This study aims to determine the impact of carotid artery stenting (CAS) modality on the incidence, severity, and overall outcomes of CHS after carotid revascularization. Methods: Data from patients who underwent CAS with either distal embolic protection (CAS + DEP) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database through the years 2016-2023. Cases without embolic protection device and patients suffering from carotid dissection, trauma, or fibromuscular dysplasia were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified into asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups and then further reviewed based on the urgency of their revascularization. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CHS after revascularization. A subgroup analysis was then performed, evaluating postprocedural outcomes and severity of CHS. Lastly, patients with CHS were further analyzed according to the severity of their stroke on admission using the Results: In this analysis, a total of 69,480 (57.47% TCAR; 42.53% CAS + DEP) patients were included. Postprocedural CHS was lower in the TCAR cohort compared to the CAS + DEP cohort (0.53% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, TCAR was associated with lower risk of CHS than CAS + DEP (P < 0.001). When considering only asymptomatic patients, revascularization modality did not significantly affect CHS occurrence (P - 0.610). However, in symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with 2-fold lower risk of CHS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001), in both elective (P - 0.003), and urgent/emergency cases (P < 0.001). Among patients who developed CHS, those undergoing TCAR had decreased in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.94, P - 0.031) and at 30 days (aOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P - 0.006). TCAR patients with CHS also had a shorter length of hospitalization (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92, P - 0.022) and suffered less frequently from severe CHS with seizures and intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, P - 0.019). Patients undergoing CAS + DEP who were admitted with severe stroke (Modified Conclusion: In patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, TCAR is associated with a dergo TCAR express a milder form of CHS and have lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality than those treated with CAS + DEP.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization with Dynamic Flow Reversal vs Transcarotid Artery Stenting with Distal Embolic Protection
    Naazie, Isaac N.
    Dakour-Aridi, Hanaa
    Mathlouthi, Asma
    Al-Nouri, Omar
    Cui, Christina
    Malas, Mahmoud
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (04) : E265 - E266
  • [2] In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Dynamic Flow Reversal Versus Transcarotid Artery Stenting With Distal Embolic Protection
    Naazie, Isaac N.
    Dakour-Aridi, Hanaa
    Mathlouthi, Asma
    Al-Nouri, Omar
    Cui, Christina
    Malas, Mahmoud
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : E63 - E64
  • [3] Elective carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection
    Durmaz, Hasanali
    Ergun, Onur
    Birgi, Erdem
    Dayanir, Hakan
    Conkbayir, Isik
    Hekimoglu, Saki
    NEUROLOGY ASIA, 2020, 25 (03) : 253 - 262
  • [4] Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after stenting for revascularization of intracranial internal carotid artery dissection
    Funatsu, Takayuki
    Imamura, Hirotoshi
    Tani, Shoichi
    Adachi, Hidemitsu
    Adachi, Hiromasa
    Sakai, Nobuyuki
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 227
  • [5] Comparison of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting Based on High Risk Anatomic Characteristics
    Zhu, Jerry
    Rao, Ajit
    Ting, Windsor
    Han, Daniel
    Tadros, Rami
    Finlay, David
    Phair, John
    Vouyouka, Ageliki
    Liu, Helen
    Marin, Michael
    Faries, Peter
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 87 : 21 - 30
  • [6] PROXIMAL VERSUS DISTAL EMBOLIC PROTECTION FOR CAROTID ARTERY STENTING
    Giri, Jay S.
    Kennedy, Kevin
    Weinberg, Ido
    Donaldson, Cameron
    Hawkins, Beau
    White, Christopher
    Rosenfield, Kenneth
    Yeh, Robert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A1717 - A1717
  • [7] Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience
    Yosuke Kajihara
    Shigeyuki Sakamoto
    Yoshihiro Kiura
    Kazutoshi Mukada
    Takahiro Chaki
    Shiro Kajihara
    Kaoru Kurisu
    Neurosurgical Review, 2015, 38 : 671 - 676
  • [8] Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience
    Kajihara, Yosuke
    Sakamoto, Shigeyuki
    Kiura, Yoshihiro
    Mukada, Kazutoshi
    Chaki, Takahiro
    Kajihara, Shiro
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 38 (04) : 671 - 676
  • [9] Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome post-carotid artery stenting
    Tan, G. S-S
    Phatouros, C. C.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [10] Anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting
    Wu, Winona W.
    Liang, Patric
    O'Donnell, Thomas F. X.
    Swerdlow, Nicholas J.
    Li, Chun
    Wyers, Mark C.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (05) : 1452 - 1460