Ai-powered screening for psoriatic arthritis: A comparative study with existing tools

被引:0
|
作者
Bakay, Ozge Sevil Karstarli [1 ]
Bakay, Umut [2 ]
Duran, Tugba Izci [2 ]
Ok, Zeynep Dundar [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Med, Dept Dermatol, Denizli, Turkiye
[2] Denizli State Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Denizli, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Tool; Early Arthritis For Psoriatic Patients; Questionnaire; Chatgpt; Pest; Earp; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.4328/ACAM.22563
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is common in psoriasis patients but is sometimes overlooked. Delayed diagnosis of PsA can lead to joint erosion, axial damage, and impaired physical function. Screening tools are essential for early diagnosis and selecting the right patients for rheumatological evaluation. We aimed to develop a practical and comprehensive screening tool using the ChatGPT and compare its performance with that of validated questionnaires. Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on adult psoriasis patients who had musculoskeletal complaints but were not diagnosed with PsA. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered PsA screening (AIPS) was developed by selecting questions on peripheral arthritis, axial inflammation, and enthesitis from multivariate analyses conducted via Chat GPT 4.0. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST), the Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients Questionnaire (EARP), and the AIPS questionnaires were completed concurrently by all psoriasis patients. All patients were evaluated for PSA diagnosis by three rheumatologists who were blinded to the questionnaire responses. Results: The study included 199 patients, 115 (57.8%) of whom were female. The mean age was 44.4 +/- 13.3 years. PSA was detected in 84 psoriasis patients (42.2%). The sensitivity of the EARP questionnaire, 98%, was greater than those of the AIPS and PEST questionnaires, which had 92% and 83% sensitivity values, respectively. However, the AIPS had a higher specificity at 96% than did the PEST and EARP, with specificities of 91% and 80%, respectively. Discussion: The AIPS questionnaire is an effective tool for screening for PsA, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity. Artificial intelligence can help screen patients, saving time and money.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 208
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fostering Undergraduate Academic Research: Rolling out a Tech Stack with AI-Powered Tools in a Library
    Michalak, Russell
    JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION, 2024, 64 (03) : 335 - 346
  • [32] EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF AI-POWERED WRITING TOOLS ON INDEPENDENT WRITING SKILLS OF HEALTH SCIENCE GRADUATES
    Milton, Cynthia
    Lokesh, Vidhya
    Thiruvengadam, Gayathri
    ADVANCED EDUCATION, 2024, (25) : 143 - 161
  • [33] Enhancing Rheumatology Consultations with AI-Powered Triage: The ReumAI Pilot Study
    Gomez-Centeno, Antonio
    Sabaris-Vilas, Marina
    Segura-Sanchez, Javier
    Garcia-Sancho, Fermin
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 76 : 3954 - 3955
  • [34] Enhancing Language Teacher Education: Exploring the Integration of AI-Powered Tools in Preservice Teacher Education
    Khajavi, Yaser
    Ezhdehakosh, Mahnaz
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2025, 16 (01): : 189 - 206
  • [35] Mapping the Evidence Around the Use of AI-Powered Tools in South African Universities: A Systematic Review
    Mbangeleli, Noluthando Busiswa Agape
    Funda, Vusumzi
    Proceedings of the International Conference on Education Research, ICER 2024, 2024, : 159 - 167
  • [36] Comparison of three screening tools to detect psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis (CONTEST study)
    Coates, L. C.
    Aslam, T.
    Al Balushi, F.
    Burden, A. D.
    Burden-The, E.
    Caperon, A. R.
    Cerio, R.
    Chattopadhyay, C.
    Chinoy, H.
    Goodfield, M. J. D.
    Kay, L.
    Kelly, S.
    Kirkham, B. W.
    Lovell, C. R.
    Marzo-Ortega, H.
    McHugh, N.
    Murphy, R.
    Reynolds, N. J.
    Smith, C. H.
    Stewart, E. J. C.
    Warren, R. B.
    Waxman, R.
    Wilson, H. E.
    Helliwell, P. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 168 (04) : 802 - 807
  • [37] Performance of screening tools for psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional study in primary care
    Karreman, Maren C.
    Weel, Angelique E. A. M.
    van der Ven, Myrthe
    Vis, Marijn
    Tchetverikov, Ilja
    Nijsten, Tamar E. C.
    Wakkee, Marlies
    Hazes, Johanna M. W.
    Luime, Jolanda J.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 56 (04) : 597 - 602
  • [38] Psoriatic arthritis screening tools: study design and methodologic challenges - reply from authors
    Coates, L. C.
    Aslam, T.
    Al Balushi, F.
    Burden, A. D.
    Burden-Teh, E.
    Caperon, A. R.
    Cerio, R.
    Chattopadhyay, C.
    Chinoy, H.
    Goodfield, M. J. D.
    Kay, L.
    Kelly, S.
    Kirkham, B. W.
    Lovell, C. R.
    Marzo-Ortega, H.
    McHugh, N.
    Murphy, R.
    Reynolds, N. J.
    Smith, C. H.
    Stewart, E. J. C.
    Warren, R. B.
    Waxman, R.
    Wilson, H. E.
    Helliwell, P. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 170 (04) : 995 - 996
  • [39] VALIDATION OF FOUR SCREENING TOOLS FOR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IN CHINESE PATIENTS WITH PSORIASIS: A MULTICENTER STUDY
    Cui, R.
    Chen, M.
    Li, X.
    Bi, X. L.
    Ding, Y.
    Dai, S. M.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 : 885 - 885
  • [40] Assessing the Efficacy of an AI-Powered Chatbot (ChatGPT) in Providing Information on Orthopedic Surgeries: A Comparative Study With Expert Opinion
    Smith, Andrew M.
    Jacquez, Evan A.
    Argintar, Evan H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)