Ai-powered screening for psoriatic arthritis: A comparative study with existing tools

被引:0
|
作者
Bakay, Ozge Sevil Karstarli [1 ]
Bakay, Umut [2 ]
Duran, Tugba Izci [2 ]
Ok, Zeynep Dundar [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Med, Dept Dermatol, Denizli, Turkiye
[2] Denizli State Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Denizli, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Tool; Early Arthritis For Psoriatic Patients; Questionnaire; Chatgpt; Pest; Earp; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.4328/ACAM.22563
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is common in psoriasis patients but is sometimes overlooked. Delayed diagnosis of PsA can lead to joint erosion, axial damage, and impaired physical function. Screening tools are essential for early diagnosis and selecting the right patients for rheumatological evaluation. We aimed to develop a practical and comprehensive screening tool using the ChatGPT and compare its performance with that of validated questionnaires. Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on adult psoriasis patients who had musculoskeletal complaints but were not diagnosed with PsA. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered PsA screening (AIPS) was developed by selecting questions on peripheral arthritis, axial inflammation, and enthesitis from multivariate analyses conducted via Chat GPT 4.0. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST), the Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients Questionnaire (EARP), and the AIPS questionnaires were completed concurrently by all psoriasis patients. All patients were evaluated for PSA diagnosis by three rheumatologists who were blinded to the questionnaire responses. Results: The study included 199 patients, 115 (57.8%) of whom were female. The mean age was 44.4 +/- 13.3 years. PSA was detected in 84 psoriasis patients (42.2%). The sensitivity of the EARP questionnaire, 98%, was greater than those of the AIPS and PEST questionnaires, which had 92% and 83% sensitivity values, respectively. However, the AIPS had a higher specificity at 96% than did the PEST and EARP, with specificities of 91% and 80%, respectively. Discussion: The AIPS questionnaire is an effective tool for screening for PsA, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity. Artificial intelligence can help screen patients, saving time and money.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 208
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AI-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
    Li, Tingyang
    Stein, Joshua D.
    Nallasamy, Nambi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 106 (09) : 1222 - 1226
  • [22] Assessing AI-Powered Patient Education: A Case Study in Radiology
    Kuckelman, Ian J.
    Yi, Paul H.
    Bui, Molinna
    Onuh, Ifeanyi
    Anderson, Jade A.
    Ross, Andrew B.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : 338 - 342
  • [23] Myeloma and Lymphoma Medical Helpers: AI-Powered Decision Support Tools for Hematologic Malignancies
    Crucitti, Davide
    Miguez, Carlos Perez
    Perez, Marta Sonia Gonzalez
    Arias, Jose Angel Diaz
    Fernandez, Jesus Gomez
    Fiel, Manuel Pineiro
    Panizo, Carlos
    Mateos, Maria-Victoria
    Orgueira, Adrian Mosquera
    BLOOD, 2024, 144 : 7478 - 7479
  • [24] Enhanced E-Commerce Personalization Through AI-Powered Content Generation Tools
    Wasilewski, Adam
    Chawla, Yash
    Pralat, Ewa
    IEEE ACCESS, 2025, 13 : 48083 - 48095
  • [25] Comparative evaluation of an AI-powered life coach against traditional coaching methods
    Brown, David
    Orozco, Marlene
    Lloyd, Noah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED COACHING & MENTORING, 2025, 23 (01): : 384 - 393
  • [26] Do Innovative Teachers use AI-powered Tools More Interactively? A Study in the Context of Diffusion of Innovation Theory
    Uzumcu, Ozlem
    Acilmis, Hasan
    TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING, 2024, 29 (02) : 1109 - 1128
  • [27] Development and Testing of New Candidate Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaires Combining Optimal Questions From Existing Tools
    Coates, Laura C.
    Walsh, Jessica
    Haroon, Muhammad
    Fitzgerald, Oliver
    Aslam, Tariq
    Al Balushi, Farida
    Burden, A. D.
    Burden-Teh, Esther
    Caperon, Anna R.
    Cerio, Rino
    Chattopadhyay, Chandrabhusan
    Chinoy, Hector
    Goodfield, Mark J. D.
    Kay, Lesley
    Kelly, Stephen
    Kirkham, Bruce W.
    Lovell, Christopher R.
    Marzo-Ortega, Helena
    McHugh, Neil
    Murphy, Ruth
    Reynolds, Nick J.
    Smith, Catherine H.
    Stewart, Elizabeth J. C.
    Warren, Richard B.
    Waxman, Robin
    Wilson, Hilary E.
    Helliwell, Philip S.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2014, 66 (09) : 1410 - 1416
  • [28] Evaluation of AI-Powered Routine Screening of Clinically Acquired cMRIs for Incidental Intracranial Aneurysms
    Schmidt, Christina Carina
    Stahl, Robert
    Mueller, Franziska
    Fischer, Thomas David
    Forbrig, Robert
    Brem, Christian
    Isik, Hakan
    Seelos, Klaus
    Thon, Niklas
    Stoecklein, Sophia
    Liebig, Thomas
    Rueckel, Johannes
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2025, 15 (03)
  • [29] AI-powered visual diagnosis of vulvar lichen sclerosus: A pilot study
    Gottfrois, Philippe
    Zhu, Jie
    Steiger, Alexandra
    Amruthalingam, Ludovic
    Kind, Andre B.
    Heinzelmann, Viola
    Mang, Claudia
    Navarini, Alexander A.
    Mueller, Simon M.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2024, 38 (12) : 2280 - 2285
  • [30] Unlocking AI-Powered Tools Adoption among University Students: A Fuzzy-Set Approach
    Soliman, Mohamed
    Ali, Reham Adel
    Mahmud, Imran
    Noipom, Tawat
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY-MALAYSIA, 2025, 24 (01): : 1 - 28