A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing STREAMLINE Canaloplasty to Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

被引:0
|
作者
Goldberg, Damien F. [1 ]
Orlich, Claudio [2 ]
Flowers, Brian E. [3 ]
Singh, Inder P. [4 ]
Tyson, Sydney [5 ]
Seibold, Leonard K. [6 ]
ElMallah, Mohammed K. [7 ]
Ison, Elysia M. [8 ]
Harbin, Med [8 ]
Reynolds, Heather [8 ]
Kahook, Malik Y. [9 ]
机构
[1] Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates, Torrance, CA USA
[2] Clin 20-20, San Jose, Costa Rica
[3] Ophthalmol Associates, Ft Worth, TX USA
[4] Eye Ctr Racine & Kenosha, Racine, WI USA
[5] Eye Associates & SurgiCenter Vineland, Vineland, NJ USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Aurora, CO USA
[7] Ocala Eye, Ocala, FL USA
[8] New World Med, Rancho Cucamonga, CA USA
[9] Univ Colorado, Dept Ophthalmol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO 80309 USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
primary open-angle glaucoma; POAG; STREAMLINE; iStent inject W; canaloplasty; microinvasive glaucoma surgery; MIGS; KAHOOK DUAL BLADE; EXCISIONAL GONIOTOMY; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S481945
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild- to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification. Patients and Methods: Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit. Results: Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86 +/- 3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16 +/- 3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52 +/- 3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08 +/- 3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80 +/- 2.79 mmHg to 16.00 +/- 3.40 mmHg and 24.60 +/- 3.18 mmHg to 15.80 +/- 2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20 +/- 0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40 +/- 0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited. Conclusion: To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.
引用
收藏
页码:2917 / 2928
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] iStent Trabecular Micro-bypass Stent Implantation Combined with Phacoemulsification for Open-Angle Glaucoma: A 2-Year Post-marketing Surveillance Study in Japan
    Inatani, Masaru
    Kohama, Ichiro
    Chu, Alice
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2022, 39 (09) : 4076 - 4093
  • [22] Randomized Evaluation of the Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract
    Samuelson, Thomas W.
    Katz, L. Jay
    Wells, Jeffrey M.
    Duh, Yi-Jing
    Giamporcaro, Jane Ellen
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [23] Micro-Bypass Implantation for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Combined with Phacoemulsification: 4-Year Follow-Up
    Fea, Antonio Maria
    Consolandi, Giulia
    Zola, Marta
    Pignata, Giulia
    Cannizzo, Paola
    Lavia, Carlo
    Rolle, Teresa
    Grignolo, Federico Maria
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [24] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF ISTENT TRABECULAR MICRO-BYPASS STENT VERSUS MEDICATIONS ONLY FOR PATIENTS WITH OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA IN COLOMBIA
    Ordonez, J. E.
    Ordonez, A.
    Osorio, U. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S171 - S171
  • [25] Three-year outcomes of combined trabecular micro-bypass and phacoemulsification in a predominantly Hispanic population with primary open-angle glaucoma
    Gallardo, Mark J.
    Supnet, Richard A.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 13 : 869 - 879
  • [26] THE EFFICACY OF COMBINED TRABECULAR MICRO-BYPASS STENT AND PHACOEMULSIFICATION FOR COEXISTING PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA (POAG) AND CATARACT - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Ewe, Shaun Y. P.
    Lim, Chris H. L.
    Toh, Tze'Yo
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 43 : 96 - 96
  • [27] iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation with Cataract Surgery in a Japanese Glaucoma Population
    Nitta, Koji
    Yamada, Yutaro
    Morokado, Satomi
    Sugiyama, Kazuhisa
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 3381 - 3391
  • [28] Outcomes of Combined iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass and Cataract Surgery for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma in a Saudi Population
    Al Habash, Ahmed
    Khan, Omar
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 1573 - 1580
  • [29] Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: Two-year follow-up
    Craven, E. Randy
    Katz, L. Jay
    Wells, Jeffrey M.
    Giamporcaro, Jane Ellen
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 38 (08): : 1339 - 1345
  • [30] Refractive Outcomes After Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents (iStent Inject) with Cataract Extraction in Open-Angle Glaucoma
    Ioannidis, Alexandros S.
    Toteberg-Harms, Marc
    Hamann, Timothy
    Hodge, Christopher
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 517 - 524