Proton and Carbon Ion Beam Spot Size Measurement Using 5 Different Detector Types

被引:0
|
作者
Witt, Matthias [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weber, Uli [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Adeberg, Sebastian [2 ,3 ]
Baumann, Kilian-Simon [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Zink, Klemens [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci, Inst Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Giessen, Germany
[2] Marburg Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiat Oncol, Marburg, Germany
[3] Marburg Ion Beam Therapy Ctr MIT, Marburg, Germany
[4] GSI Helmholtzzentrum Schwerionenforsch, Biophys Div, Darmstadt, Germany
[5] TH Mittelhessen Univ Appl Sci, LOEWE Res Cluster Adv Med Phys Imaging & Therapy A, Giessen, Germany
关键词
Spot size; Quality assurance; Pencil beam scanning; Detector comparison; GAFCHROMIC EBT FILM; SCANNED PROTON; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; NUCLEAR HALO; DAILY QA; THERAPY; MODEL; RADIOTHERAPY; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100638
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The spot size of scanned particle beams is of crucial importance for the correct dose delivery and, therefore, plays a significant role in the quality assurance (QA) of pencil beam scanning ion beam therapy. Materials and Methods: This study compares 5 detector types-radiochromic film, ionization chamber (IC) array, flat panel detector, multiwire chamber, and IC-for measuring the spot size of proton and carbon ion beams. Results: Variations of up to 30% were found between detectors, underscoring the impact of detector choice on QA outcomes. The multiwire chamber consistently measured the smallest spot sizes, attributed to its intrinsic calculation model, while the IC array yielded larger spot sizes due to volume-averaging effects. These discrepancies highlight the necessity of selecting detectors based on QA needs, such as measurement speed, spatial resolution, and data acquisition methods. Digital detectors offer advantages over film-based ones by automating data processing, reducing manual errors, and providing immediate results. Conclusion: The study concludes that, although a single Gaussian fit is generally sufficient for QA, more sophisticated models might be beneficial for special applications. These findings aim to guide detector selection for ion beam facilities, enhancing QA procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Proton beam position measurement in air using a BPM
    Roy, Prabir K.
    Lewellen, John W.
    Neukirch, Levi P.
    Watkins, Heath A.
    AIP ADVANCES, 2020, 10 (09)
  • [42] Measurement of Kβ/Kα values using proton beam
    Ramanamurthy, GAV
    Rao, KR
    Krishna, YR
    Venkateswarlu, P
    Rao, KB
    Rao, PVR
    Ratnam, SV
    Rao, VS
    Nagaraju, GJ
    Reddy, SB
    PRAMANA-JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2001, 56 (05): : 697 - 703
  • [43] Beam characterization measurement of a duoplasmatron ion source for the Nanjing Proton Source
    Zhang, Hong
    Zhang, Pengjiao
    Song, Jie
    An, Sun
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2022, 1027
  • [44] Measurement of the Ion Collection Efficiency of Different Ion Chambers in Proton FLASH Irradiation
    Yin, L.
    Kim, M.
    Zou, J.
    Diffenderfer, E.
    Dong, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E470 - E470
  • [45] Silicon microstrip detector irradiation using a 26 MeV proton beam
    Albergo, S.
    Chiorboli, M.
    Civinini, C.
    D'Alessandro, R.
    Macchiolo, A.
    Marchettini, C.
    Meschini, M.
    Potenza, R.
    Rovelli, A.
    Tricomi, A.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2007, 583 (01): : 27 - 32
  • [46] ON THE POSSIBILITIES OF USING EDGE DETECTOR ALGORITHMS FOR BEAM SPOT DIAGNOSTICS OF ACCELERATOR BEAMS
    LINDBLAD, T
    JOHANSSON, F
    KALLBERG, A
    LINDSEY, CS
    ROSENGARD, U
    SZEKELY, G
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1994, 351 (2-3): : 595 - 597
  • [47] Three-dimensional measurement of a proton beam profile at KOMAC with a scintillating fiber detector
    Kim, S. H.
    Lee, J. W.
    Jung, W. S.
    Ahn, J. K.
    Jung, M. H.
    Kim, Y. J.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2022, 1034
  • [48] Quality assurance of carbon ion and proton beams: A feasibility study for using the 2D MatriXX detector
    Anvar, M. Varasteh
    Attili, A.
    Ciocca, M.
    Donetti, M.
    Guarachi, L. K. Fanola
    Fausti, F.
    Giordanengo, S.
    Marchetto, F.
    Molinelli, S.
    Monaco, V.
    Sacchi, R.
    Vignati, A.
    Cirio, R.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (06): : 831 - 837
  • [49] Effects of Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Spot Size on Head and Neck Treatment Plan Quality
    Mundy, D.
    Foote, R. L.
    Beltran, C.
    Herman, M. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E603 - E603
  • [50] MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRON BEAM ENERGY USING A GAS CERENKOV DETECTOR
    BHIDAY, MR
    JENNINGS, RE
    KALMUS, PIP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON, 1958, 72 (468): : 973 - 980