Proton and Carbon Ion Beam Spot Size Measurement Using 5 Different Detector Types

被引:0
|
作者
Witt, Matthias [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weber, Uli [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Adeberg, Sebastian [2 ,3 ]
Baumann, Kilian-Simon [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Zink, Klemens [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci, Inst Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Giessen, Germany
[2] Marburg Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiat Oncol, Marburg, Germany
[3] Marburg Ion Beam Therapy Ctr MIT, Marburg, Germany
[4] GSI Helmholtzzentrum Schwerionenforsch, Biophys Div, Darmstadt, Germany
[5] TH Mittelhessen Univ Appl Sci, LOEWE Res Cluster Adv Med Phys Imaging & Therapy A, Giessen, Germany
关键词
Spot size; Quality assurance; Pencil beam scanning; Detector comparison; GAFCHROMIC EBT FILM; SCANNED PROTON; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; NUCLEAR HALO; DAILY QA; THERAPY; MODEL; RADIOTHERAPY; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100638
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The spot size of scanned particle beams is of crucial importance for the correct dose delivery and, therefore, plays a significant role in the quality assurance (QA) of pencil beam scanning ion beam therapy. Materials and Methods: This study compares 5 detector types-radiochromic film, ionization chamber (IC) array, flat panel detector, multiwire chamber, and IC-for measuring the spot size of proton and carbon ion beams. Results: Variations of up to 30% were found between detectors, underscoring the impact of detector choice on QA outcomes. The multiwire chamber consistently measured the smallest spot sizes, attributed to its intrinsic calculation model, while the IC array yielded larger spot sizes due to volume-averaging effects. These discrepancies highlight the necessity of selecting detectors based on QA needs, such as measurement speed, spatial resolution, and data acquisition methods. Digital detectors offer advantages over film-based ones by automating data processing, reducing manual errors, and providing immediate results. Conclusion: The study concludes that, although a single Gaussian fit is generally sufficient for QA, more sophisticated models might be beneficial for special applications. These findings aim to guide detector selection for ion beam facilities, enhancing QA procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement of Proton Beam Spot Size Using a 2D Ion Chamber Array for Daily QA
    Thorne, N.
    Kassaee, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3500 - 3500
  • [2] Determination of proton beam spot size in water
    Fredh, A.
    Hrbacek, J.
    Safai, S.
    Lomax, T.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (01) : 105 - 106
  • [3] Dose rate and beam profile measurement of proton beam using a flat panel detector
    Jeong-Min Park
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 67 : 1410 - 1413
  • [4] Dose rate and beam profile measurement of proton beam using a flat panel detector
    Park, Jeong-Min
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 67 (08) : 1410 - 1413
  • [5] Homogeneity study of proton and carbon ion scanning beams using combinations of different spot sizes and grid sizes
    Xing, Ying
    Wu, Xianwei
    Li, Yongqiang
    Zhao, Jun
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (11) : 6047 - 6052
  • [6] Changes in proton beam spot size due to spot scanning nozzle components
    Polf, J
    Newhauser, W
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1868 - 1868
  • [7] Research on proton beam spot imaging based on pixelated gamma detector
    Sun, Y. K.
    Jing, H. T.
    Tian, B. B.
    Gao, X. L.
    Yang, X. Y.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [8] Fast range measurement of spot scanning proton beams using a volumetric liquid scintillator detector
    Hui, Cheuk Kai
    Robertson, Daniel
    Alsanea, Fahed
    Beddar, Sam
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2015, 1 (02):
  • [9] Proton beam spot size and position measurements using a multi-strip ionization chamber
    Lin, Ye
    Zhang, Haiqun
    Gu, Shuaizhe
    Shen, Liren
    Lv, Ming
    Zhang, Manzhou
    Chen, Zhiling
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 123
  • [10] MEASUREMENT OF A GAUSSIAN LASER-BEAM SPOT SIZE USING A BOUNDARY DIFFRACTION WAVE
    KIMURA, S
    MUNAKATA, C
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1988, 27 (01): : 84 - 88