Computer adaptive testing strategies for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

被引:0
|
作者
Wong, Emily F. [1 ]
Accortt, Eynav E. [2 ]
Choi, Seung W. [3 ]
Bright, Tiffani J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Computat Biomed, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Educ Psychol, Austin, TX USA
关键词
Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders; Postpartum depression; Computer adaptive testing; Edinburgh postnatal depression scale; Algorithmic fairness; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; PERINATAL DEPRESSION; SCREENING TOOLS; ANXIETY; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; SYMPTOMS; BARRIERS; MOTHERS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00737-025-01562-5
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
PurposePerinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) include depressive and anxiety disorders during pregnancy or postpartum and can have significant consequences for the parent, child, and family. When severe, these conditions can lead to suicide. Despite numerous policy efforts to improve screening, education, and referral structures, disparities in PMAD diagnosis and treatment still exists, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities. Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) has been shown to improve the efficiency of screening by significantly reducing test length. This study evaluates whether applying CAT to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) maintains diagnostic accuracy while ensuring these methods do not exacerbate racial disparities in PMAD screening outcomes.MethodsUsing real data simulation, we assessed three CAT-based short-form versions of the EPDS, derived from one-, two-, and three-factor item response theory models. We evaluated their diagnostic precision and examined potential racial disparities in false negative rates compared to the full-length EPDS.ResultsWe demonstrate that estimated scores from three short versions of the EPDS administered through CAT-assuming one, two, and three-factor item response theory models-are more highly correlated with the full-length EPDS measure traditionally used to make clinical decisions (r's between 0.96 and 0.97) than the major depressive disorder subtest (CAT-MDD) from CAT-Mental Health (CAT-MH (R)) (r =.82), as previously reported. Importantly, the false negative rates of the CAT-implied diagnoses did not significantly vary between racial groups, indicating no evidence of racial bias in diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionThe CAT-based versions of the EPDS offers a promising solution for improving the efficiency of PMAD screening without sacrificing diagnostic precision or exacerbating racial groups. By reducing evaluation time, these tools could facilitate more widespread and equitable screening, enabling earlier diagnosis and treatment of PMADs across diverse populations. center dot Short versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) tool, if administered through computer adaptive testing (CAT), provide very close approximations of the full scale but may miss a small portion of patients who otherwise would have screened positive.center dot The CAT versions of the EPDS provide a closer approximation of the standard screening tool for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) than the CAT-Mental Health (CAT-MH (R)).center dot We recommend screening for suicidal ideation after the CAT-administered EPDS for all patients to minimize the number of missed diagnoses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sensitivity and Specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) among Iranian Mothers: A Psychometric Study
    Shoaee, Fatemeh
    Mohsenpour, Ziba
    Najarzadegan, Mohammad Reza
    Nekouhi, Soudabeh
    Razmjouei, Parisa
    Babakhanian, Masoudeh
    Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh
    Dizavandi, Fatemeh Rajab
    Kareshki, Hossein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS-MASHHAD, 2019, 7 (12): : 10533 - 10540
  • [32] EDINBURGH POSTNATAL DEPRESSION SCALE
    VINCENTI, GE
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1987, 151 : 865 - 865
  • [33] The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
    Matthey, S
    Barnett, B
    White, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 182 : 368 - 368
  • [34] Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in a sample of women with high-risk pregnancies in France
    F. Adouard
    N.M.C. Glangeaud-Freudenthal
    B. Golse
    Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 2005, 8 : 89 - 95
  • [35] Early identification of women at risk of postpartum depression using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a sample of Lebanese women
    El-Hachem, Charline
    Rohayem, Jihane
    Khalil, Rami Bou
    Richa, Sami
    Kesrouani, Assaad
    Gemayel, Rima
    Aouad, Norma
    Hatab, Najat
    Zaccak, Eliane
    Yaghi, Nancy
    Salameh, Salime
    Attieh, Elie
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 14
  • [36] Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy
    Jomeen, J
    Martin, CR
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 23 (02) : 143 - 154
  • [37] Perinatal Mental Health: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Manual, 2nd edition
    Pearlstein, Teri
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 76 (08) : E1041 - E1041
  • [38] Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in a sample of women with high-risk pregnancies in France
    Adouard, F
    Glangeaud-Freudenthal, NMC
    Golse, B
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2005, 8 (02) : 89 - 95
  • [39] Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) identify antenatal depression and antenatal anxiety disorders? A validation study in Singapore
    Zeng, Ningxiang
    Goh, Pamela Hui Yee
    Chua, Tze-Ern
    Sultana, Rehena
    Tan, Chin Wen
    Sng, Ban Leong
    Chen, Helen
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2025, 380 : 496 - 504
  • [40] A population survey of prevalence rates of antenatal depression in the Irish obstetric services using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
    Chaitra Jairaj
    Clara Mai Fitzsimons
    Fionnuala M. McAuliffe
    Niamh O’Leary
    Niamh Joyce
    Anthony McCarthy
    Eugene Cassidy
    Jennifer Donnelly
    Elizabeth Tully
    Mendinaro Imcha
    Jackie Austin
    Kelly Doolin
    Chloe Farrell
    Veronica O’Keane
    Archives of Women's Mental Health, 2019, 22 : 349 - 355