Computer adaptive testing strategies for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

被引:0
|
作者
Wong, Emily F. [1 ]
Accortt, Eynav E. [2 ]
Choi, Seung W. [3 ]
Bright, Tiffani J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Computat Biomed, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Educ Psychol, Austin, TX USA
关键词
Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders; Postpartum depression; Computer adaptive testing; Edinburgh postnatal depression scale; Algorithmic fairness; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; PERINATAL DEPRESSION; SCREENING TOOLS; ANXIETY; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; SYMPTOMS; BARRIERS; MOTHERS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00737-025-01562-5
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
PurposePerinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) include depressive and anxiety disorders during pregnancy or postpartum and can have significant consequences for the parent, child, and family. When severe, these conditions can lead to suicide. Despite numerous policy efforts to improve screening, education, and referral structures, disparities in PMAD diagnosis and treatment still exists, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities. Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) has been shown to improve the efficiency of screening by significantly reducing test length. This study evaluates whether applying CAT to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) maintains diagnostic accuracy while ensuring these methods do not exacerbate racial disparities in PMAD screening outcomes.MethodsUsing real data simulation, we assessed three CAT-based short-form versions of the EPDS, derived from one-, two-, and three-factor item response theory models. We evaluated their diagnostic precision and examined potential racial disparities in false negative rates compared to the full-length EPDS.ResultsWe demonstrate that estimated scores from three short versions of the EPDS administered through CAT-assuming one, two, and three-factor item response theory models-are more highly correlated with the full-length EPDS measure traditionally used to make clinical decisions (r's between 0.96 and 0.97) than the major depressive disorder subtest (CAT-MDD) from CAT-Mental Health (CAT-MH (R)) (r =.82), as previously reported. Importantly, the false negative rates of the CAT-implied diagnoses did not significantly vary between racial groups, indicating no evidence of racial bias in diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionThe CAT-based versions of the EPDS offers a promising solution for improving the efficiency of PMAD screening without sacrificing diagnostic precision or exacerbating racial groups. By reducing evaluation time, these tools could facilitate more widespread and equitable screening, enabling earlier diagnosis and treatment of PMADs across diverse populations. center dot Short versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) tool, if administered through computer adaptive testing (CAT), provide very close approximations of the full scale but may miss a small portion of patients who otherwise would have screened positive.center dot The CAT versions of the EPDS provide a closer approximation of the standard screening tool for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) than the CAT-Mental Health (CAT-MH (R)).center dot We recommend screening for suicidal ideation after the CAT-administered EPDS for all patients to minimize the number of missed diagnoses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A study of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) on 859 mothers : detection of mothers at risk for postpartum depression
    Teissedre, F
    Chabrol, H
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2004, 30 (04): : 376 - 381
  • [22] The Simplified Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for Antenatal Depression: Is It a Valid Measure for Pre-Screening?
    Choi, Sae Kyung
    Kim, Jung Jin
    Park, Yong Gyu
    Ko, Hyun Sun
    Park, In Yang
    Shin, Jong Chul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 9 (01): : 40 - 46
  • [23] PREVALENCE OF DEPRESSION AT WOMEN DURING PREGNANCY- BY USING EDINBURGH POSTNATAL DEPRESSION SCALE (EPDS) INSTRUMENT
    Cela, Mirela
    Kola, Vuksan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY SCIENCE-IJEES, 2019, 9 (04): : 763 - 774
  • [24] A partner-rating scale of postpartum depression: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-Partner (EPDS-P)
    Moran, T. E.
    O'Hara, M. W.
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2006, 9 (04) : 173 - 180
  • [25] Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) as a screening tool for postnatal depression in Samoan and Tongan women living in New Zealand
    Ekeroma, Alec J.
    Ikenasio-Thorpe, Bettina
    Weeks, Sara
    Kokaua, Jesse
    Puniani, Kasalanaita
    Stone, Peter
    Foliaki, Siale A.
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (1355) : 41 - 49
  • [26] Screening for postnatal depression in Bengali women: Preliminary observations from using a translated version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
    Fuggle, P
    Glover, L
    Khan, F
    Haydon, K
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) : 71 - 82
  • [27] Revisiting the dimensional structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): empirical evidence for a general factor
    Michael E Reichenheim
    Claudia L Moraes
    Alessandra SD Oliveira
    Gustavo Lobato
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11
  • [28] The psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) when used prenatal
    Lydsdottir, Linda B.
    Howard, Louise M.
    Olafsdottir, Halldora
    Thome, Marga
    Tyrfingsson, Petur
    Sigurdsson, Jon Fridrik
    MIDWIFERY, 2019, 69 : 45 - 51
  • [29] Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for detection of postpartum psychiatric morbidity in Spanish mothers
    Garcia-Esteve, LL
    Navarro, P
    Ascaso, C
    Aguado, JA
    Unizony, M
    Matrai, S
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 19 : 208S - 209S
  • [30] Revisiting the dimensional structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): empirical evidence for a general factor
    Reichenheim, Michael E.
    Moraes, Claudia L.
    Oliveira, Alessandra S. D.
    Lobato, Gustavo
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11