Computer adaptive testing strategies for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

被引:0
|
作者
Wong, Emily F. [1 ]
Accortt, Eynav E. [2 ]
Choi, Seung W. [3 ]
Bright, Tiffani J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Computat Biomed, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Educ Psychol, Austin, TX USA
关键词
Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders; Postpartum depression; Computer adaptive testing; Edinburgh postnatal depression scale; Algorithmic fairness; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; PERINATAL DEPRESSION; SCREENING TOOLS; ANXIETY; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; SYMPTOMS; BARRIERS; MOTHERS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00737-025-01562-5
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
PurposePerinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) include depressive and anxiety disorders during pregnancy or postpartum and can have significant consequences for the parent, child, and family. When severe, these conditions can lead to suicide. Despite numerous policy efforts to improve screening, education, and referral structures, disparities in PMAD diagnosis and treatment still exists, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities. Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) has been shown to improve the efficiency of screening by significantly reducing test length. This study evaluates whether applying CAT to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) maintains diagnostic accuracy while ensuring these methods do not exacerbate racial disparities in PMAD screening outcomes.MethodsUsing real data simulation, we assessed three CAT-based short-form versions of the EPDS, derived from one-, two-, and three-factor item response theory models. We evaluated their diagnostic precision and examined potential racial disparities in false negative rates compared to the full-length EPDS.ResultsWe demonstrate that estimated scores from three short versions of the EPDS administered through CAT-assuming one, two, and three-factor item response theory models-are more highly correlated with the full-length EPDS measure traditionally used to make clinical decisions (r's between 0.96 and 0.97) than the major depressive disorder subtest (CAT-MDD) from CAT-Mental Health (CAT-MH (R)) (r =.82), as previously reported. Importantly, the false negative rates of the CAT-implied diagnoses did not significantly vary between racial groups, indicating no evidence of racial bias in diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionThe CAT-based versions of the EPDS offers a promising solution for improving the efficiency of PMAD screening without sacrificing diagnostic precision or exacerbating racial groups. By reducing evaluation time, these tools could facilitate more widespread and equitable screening, enabling earlier diagnosis and treatment of PMADs across diverse populations. center dot Short versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) tool, if administered through computer adaptive testing (CAT), provide very close approximations of the full scale but may miss a small portion of patients who otherwise would have screened positive.center dot The CAT versions of the EPDS provide a closer approximation of the standard screening tool for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) than the CAT-Mental Health (CAT-MH (R)).center dot We recommend screening for suicidal ideation after the CAT-administered EPDS for all patients to minimize the number of missed diagnoses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Punjabi version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
    Werrett, J
    Clifford, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2006, 43 (02) : 227 - 236
  • [2] German version and validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS)
    Bergant, AM
    Nguyen, T
    Heim, K
    Ulmer, H
    Dapunt, O
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1998, 123 (03) : 35 - 40
  • [3] Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in Spanish mothers
    Garcia-Esteve, L
    Ascaso, C
    Ojuel, J
    Navarro, P
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2003, 75 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [4] Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in non-postnatal women
    Cox, JL
    Chapman, G
    Murray, D
    Jones, P
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1996, 39 (03) : 185 - 189
  • [5] Screening for postpartum depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): An ethical analysis
    Krantz, Ingela
    Eriksson, Bo
    Lundquist-Persson, Cristina
    Ahlberg, Beth Maina
    Nilstun, Tore
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 36 (02) : 211 - 216
  • [6] The Swedish validation of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during pregnancy
    Rubertsson, Christine
    Borjesson, Karin
    Berglund, Anna
    Josefsson, Ann
    Sydsjo, Gunilla
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 65 (06) : 414 - 418
  • [7] Literature Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
    Wiens, Rachel M.
    McBride, Hillary L.
    McDonald, Marvin J.
    Cox, Daniel W.
    Chan, Eric K. H.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 169 - 169
  • [9] The factor structure of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
    Ip, Wan Yim
    Martin, Colin R.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 25 (01) : 83 - 86
  • [10] Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in Chilean postpartum women
    Jadresic, E
    Araya, R
    Jara, C
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 16 (04): : 187 - 191