The impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement on changes of coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve

被引:0
|
作者
Hu, Feng [1 ]
Lai, Qianyao [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Jun [1 ]
He, Xi [1 ]
Lin, Chaoyang [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Mingming [3 ]
Fan, Lin [1 ]
Chen, Lianglong [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Inst Coronary Artery Dis, Fujian Cardiovasc Med Ctr,Union Hosp, Fujian Cardiovasc Res Ctr,Dept Cardiol, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Hlth, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Pulse Med Technol Co, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; plaque burden; cardiac function; CCTA; CAD;
D O I
10.1080/07853890.2024.2420860
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe effect of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on changes of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) values was controversial. Thus, we aimed to identify the impact of TAVR on changes of CT-FFR values, plaque characteristics, and the associated clinical impact.MethodsThis single-center observational study included 39 consecutive patients with severe aortic valve disease undergone TAVR between August 2019 and April 2023, whom were performed with preoperative and postoperative coronary CT angiography (CCTA). The computation of CT-FFR and plaque characteristics was performed by an independent central core laboratory.ResultsEach patient underwent CCTA and CT-FFR assessment without encountering any complications. Notably, both at discharge and six months post-TAVR, there was a significant improvement observed in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, left ventricular fractional shortening, and ejection fraction compared to pre-operative levels. The CT-FFR for left anterior descending artery (LAD), left anterior descending artery (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA) had no obvious change at discharge compared to pre-operation (0.92 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.93 +/- 0.05, p = 0.109; 0.96 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.95 +/- 0.03, p = 0.523; 0.97 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.97 +/- 0.03, p = 0.533; respectively). Furthermore, TAVR did not exert a significant impact on plaque burden during the perioperative period.ConclusionsOur report suggested that TAVR did not significantly affect coronary CT-FFR measurements and plaque characteristics in the perioperative period, and furthermore, the patients' cardiac function showed gradual improvement in the short-term following discharge.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Yamanaka, Futoshi
    Shishido, Koki
    Moriyama, Noriaki
    Ochiai, Tomoki
    Sato, Daisuke
    Koyama, Eiji
    Sugiyama, Yoichi
    Tamaki, Yusuke
    Yamada, Takashi
    Hayashi, Takahiro
    Miyashita, Hirokazu
    Yokoyama, Hiroaki
    Kosaki, Ryota
    Yamashita, Takayoshi
    Yamaguchi, Masashi
    Yamagishi, Tamiharu
    Matsumoto, Takashi
    Tobita, Kazuki
    Mizuno, Shingo
    Tanaka, Yutaka
    Murakami, Masato
    Takahashi, Saeko
    Tsujita, Kenichi
    Saito, Shigeru
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 16 (08) : 1116 - 1117
  • [22] Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Developing A Gold Standard for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnostics
    Hu, Liangbo
    Wang, Yue
    Rao, Jingjing
    Tan, Lina
    He, Min
    Zeng, Xiaocong
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (10)
  • [23] Sex differences in machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve
    Al Rifai, Mahmoud
    Ahmed, Ahmed Ibrahim
    Han, Yushui
    Saad, Jean Michel
    Alnabelsi, Talal
    Nabi, Faisal
    Chang, Su Min
    Cocker, Myra
    Schwemmer, Chris
    Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan C.
    Zoghbi, William A.
    Mahmarian, John J.
    Al-Mallah, Mouaz H.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [24] Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve A Needed ADVANCE or Expensive Nicety?
    Villines, Todd C.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2020, 13 (01) : 106 - 108
  • [25] Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve An Invitation to Learn More COMMENT
    Achenbach, Stephan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 15 (02) : 296 - 298
  • [26] The Location of Distal Coronary Artery Pressure Measurement Matters for Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
    Kruk, Mariusz
    Demkow, Marcin
    Solecki, Mateusz
    Wardziak, Lukasz
    Kepka, Cezary
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2018, 11 (02) : 284 - 285
  • [27] Sex differences in machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve
    Mahmoud Al Rifai
    Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed
    Yushui Han
    Jean Michel Saad
    Talal Alnabelsi
    Faisal Nabi
    Su Min Chang
    Myra Cocker
    Chris Schwemmer
    Juan C. Ramirez-Giraldo
    William A. Zoghbi
    John J. Mahmarian
    Mouaz H. Al-Mallah
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [28] Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve A Systematic Review
    Cook, Christopher M.
    Petraco, Ricardo
    Shun-Shin, Matthew J.
    Ahmad, Yousif
    Nijjer, Sukhjinder
    Al-Lamee, Rasha
    Kikuta, Yuetsu
    Shiono, Yasutsugu
    Mayet, Jamil
    Francis, Darrel P.
    Sen, Sayan
    Davies, Justin E.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (07) : 803 - 810
  • [29] Practical Clinical Application of Cardiac Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
    Alzahrani, Talal
    Tashkandi, Ahmed
    Sarkar, Abdullah
    Smuclovisky, Claudio
    Earls, James P.
    Choi, Andrew D.
    CARDIOVASCULAR INNOVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 4 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [30] Estimating Risks to Coronary Obstruction and ProsthesisPatients Mismatch After Redo- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Computed Tomography-derived 2nd Transcatheter Aortic Valve Sizing
    Fukui, Miho
    Okada, Atsushi
    Thao, Kiahltone
    Burns, Marcus
    Sorajja, Paul
    Lesser, John
    Cavalcante, Joao
    Bapat, Vinayak
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (17) : B230 - B231