Sex differences in machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve

被引:3
|
作者
Al Rifai, Mahmoud [1 ]
Ahmed, Ahmed Ibrahim [1 ]
Han, Yushui [1 ]
Saad, Jean Michel [1 ]
Alnabelsi, Talal [2 ]
Nabi, Faisal [1 ]
Chang, Su Min [1 ]
Cocker, Myra [1 ,3 ]
Schwemmer, Chris [4 ]
Ramirez-Giraldo, Juan C. [3 ]
Zoghbi, William A. [1 ]
Mahmarian, John J. [1 ]
Al-Mallah, Mouaz H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Houston Methodist Debakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, 6550 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Siemens Healthineers, Computed Tomog Res Collaborat, Malvern, PA USA
[4] Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Computed Tomog Res & Dev, Forchheim, Germany
关键词
CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; ISCHEMIA; WOMEN; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-17875-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) derived machine learning fractional flow reserve (ML-FFRCT) can assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses. We aimed to assess sex differences in the association of ML-FFRCT and incident cardiovascular outcomes. We studied a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Obstructive stenosis was defined as >= 70% stenosis severity in non-left main vessels or >= 50% in the left main coronary. ML-FFRCT was computed using a machine learning algorithm with significant stenosis defined as ML-FFRCT < 0.8. The primary outcome was a composite of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (D/MI). Our study population consisted of 471 patients with mean (SD) age 65 (13) years, 53% men, and multiple comorbidities (78% hypertension, 66% diabetes, 81% dyslipidemia). Compared to men, women were less likely to have obstructive stenosis by CCTA (9% vs. 18%; p = 0.006), less multivessel CAD (4% vs. 6%; p = 0.25), lower prevalence of ML-FFRCT < 0.8 (39% vs. 44%; p = 0.23) and higher median (IQR) ML-FFRCT (0.76 (0.53-0.86) vs. 0.71 (0.47-0.84); p = 0.047). In multivariable adjusted models, there was no significant association between ML-FFRCT < 0.8 and D/MI [Hazard Ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval (0.30, 2.20); p = 0.25 for interaction with sex.]. In a high-risk cohort of symptomatic patients who underwent CCTA and SPECT testing, ML-FFRCT was higher in women than men. There was no significant association between ML-FFRCT and incident mortality or MI and no evidence that the prognostic value of ML-FFRCT differs by sex.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sex differences in machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve
    Mahmoud Al Rifai
    Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed
    Yushui Han
    Jean Michel Saad
    Talal Alnabelsi
    Faisal Nabi
    Su Min Chang
    Myra Cocker
    Chris Schwemmer
    Juan C. Ramirez-Giraldo
    William A. Zoghbi
    John J. Mahmarian
    Mouaz H. Al-Mallah
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [2] Machine learning in defining computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve
    Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo
    Knuuti, Juhani
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 22 (09) : 1007 - 1008
  • [3] Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for the Prediction of Functional Ischemia
    Trinh, Tri M.
    Nakanishi, Rine
    Li, Dong
    Budoff, Matthew J.
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [4] Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve A Needed ADVANCE or Expensive Nicety?
    Villines, Todd C.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2020, 13 (01) : 106 - 108
  • [5] Sex Differences in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
    Fairbairn, Timothy A.
    Dobson, Rebecca
    Hurwitz-Koweek, Lyne
    Matsuo, Hitoshi
    Norgaard, Bjarne L.
    Sand, Niels Peter Ronnow
    Nieman, Koen
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    Pontone, Gianluca
    Raff, Gilbert
    Chinnaiyan, Kavitha M.
    Rabbat, Mark
    Amano, Tetsuya
    Kawasaki, Tomohiro
    Akasaka, Takashi
    Kitabata, Hironori
    Binukrishnan, Sukumaran
    Rogers, Campbell
    Berman, Daniel
    Patel, Manesh R.
    Douglas, Pamela S.
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2020, 13 (12) : 2576 - 2587
  • [6] Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve An Invitation to Learn More COMMENT
    Achenbach, Stephan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 15 (02) : 296 - 298
  • [7] Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve A Systematic Review
    Cook, Christopher M.
    Petraco, Ricardo
    Shun-Shin, Matthew J.
    Ahmad, Yousif
    Nijjer, Sukhjinder
    Al-Lamee, Rasha
    Kikuta, Yuetsu
    Shiono, Yasutsugu
    Mayet, Jamil
    Francis, Darrel P.
    Sen, Sayan
    Davies, Justin E.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (07) : 803 - 810
  • [8] Practical Clinical Application of Cardiac Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
    Alzahrani, Talal
    Tashkandi, Ahmed
    Sarkar, Abdullah
    Smuclovisky, Claudio
    Earls, James P.
    Choi, Andrew D.
    CARDIOVASCULAR INNOVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 4 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [9] Variation of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Related to Different Vessel Morphology
    Tsugu, Toshimitsu
    Tanaka, Kaoru
    Nagatomo, Yuji
    De Maeseneer, Michel
    De Mey, Johan
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 51 (06): : 419 - +
  • [10] Influence of Coronary Artery Calcium Score on Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
    Han, Donghee
    Lin, Andrew
    Gransar, Heidi
    Dey, Damini
    Berman, Daniel S.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 14 (03) : 702 - 703