Use of amantadine in traumatic brain injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Felix, Joao [1 ]
Araujo, Luisa [1 ]
Henriques, Antonio [1 ]
Pereira, Ana [1 ]
Carneiro, Saul [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Para, Inst Med Sci, Sch Med, Belem, Brazil
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
amantadine; traumatic brain injury; neurotrauma; meta-analysis; placebo; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; PROGESTERONE;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2024.1444623
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Amantadine has been shown to accelerate cognitive and functional brain recovery after cerebrovascular accidents. However, the efficacy of this drug in TBI patients remains poorly defined. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of amantadine in TBI patients. The Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed databases were systematically searched for trials published up to March 24, 2024. Data from previous RCTs were extracted and quality assessed according to Cochrane recommendations. Means and standard deviations with 95% confidence intervals were aggregated across studies. The primary outcomes assessed were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Results From 1,292 database results, 6 studies with 426 patients were included, of which 205 received amantadine (48.12%). The Glasgow Coma Scale score on day 7 (MD 1.50; 95% CI 0.08-2.92; p = 0.038; I2 = 68%) was significantly higher in patients treated with amantadine than those treated with placebo. The Mini Mental State Examination (MD 3.23; 95% CI 0.53-5.94; p = 0.019; I2 = 0%) was also better in patients treated with amantadine. No significant differences in Disability Rating Scale, day 3 GCS, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), length of hospital stay, or duration of mechanical ventilation were observed between amantadine and placebo groups. Conclusion In our analysis, TBI patients benefit from the use of amantadine in the day 7 GCS score and show better results in the MMSE test, but placebo patients benefit from not using amantadine in the DRS between weeks 3 and 4. No other statistically significant results were found related to the use of this medication. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_ record.php?ID=CRD42024538110, CRD42024538110. Conclusion In our analysis, TBI patients benefit from the use of amantadine in the day 7 GCS score and show better results in the MMSE test, but placebo patients benefit from not using amantadine in the DRS between weeks 3 and 4. No other statistically significant results were found related to the use of this medication. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_ record.php?ID=CRD42024538110, CRD42024538110.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chang, Chun-Hung
    Chou, Po-Han
    Chuang, Hao-Yu
    Yao, Chi-Yu
    Chen, Wei-Jen
    Tsai, Hsin-Chi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [42] Terlipressin effect on hepatorenal syndrome: Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mohamed, Mohamed M. G.
    Rauf, Abdul
    Adam, Abubakr
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Lacasse, Alexandre
    El-Halawany, Hani
    JGH OPEN, 2021, 5 (08): : 896 - 901
  • [43] Timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Ling
    Chen, Dezheng
    Tang, Xin
    Li, Peiyun
    Zhang, Yong
    Tao, Ye
    RENAL FAILURE, 2020, 42 (01) : 77 - 88
  • [44] THE EFFECT OF AMANTADINE ON FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY AFTER TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Koh, Eunjung
    Ha, Eunjin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2019, 36 (13) : A48 - A48
  • [45] Association between use of febuxostat and muscle injury: A disproportionality analysis and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mitsuboshi, Satoru
    Kotake, Kazumasa
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 89 (03) : 956 - 966
  • [46] Comparisons between small intestinal and gastric feeding in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Dong
    Zheng, Shao-Qin
    Chen, Xian-Cai
    Jiang, Shi-Wen
    Chen, Hai-Bin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 123 (05) : 1194 - 1201
  • [47] Efficacy of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yuan, Xiang
    Zhang, Sen
    Wan, Jun
    Chen, Cheng
    Wang, Peng
    Fan, Shijie
    Liu, Yuyang
    Yang, Jingxian
    Hou, Jiayi
    You, Qiaoyu
    Li, Xiao
    Li, Kuilin
    Xiang, Ziyan
    Rao, Yang
    Zhang, Yu
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [48] Therapeutic effect of intensive glycemic control therapy in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhu, Chunran
    Chen, Jinjing
    Pan, Junchen
    Qiu, Zhichao
    Xu, Tao
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (30)
  • [49] Comparative efficacy of prophylactic anticonvulsant drugs following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Bo-Cyuan
    Chiu, Hsiao-Yean
    Luh, Hui-Tzung
    Lin, Chia-Jou
    Hsieh, Shu-Hua
    Chen, Ting-Jhen
    Wu, Chia-Rung
    Chen, Pin-Yuan
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [50] SGEM Hot Off the Press: hypertonic saline in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Purdy, Eve
    Thoma, Brent
    Milne, Ken
    Bond, Chris
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (05) : 379 - 384