Use of amantadine in traumatic brain injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Felix, Joao [1 ]
Araujo, Luisa [1 ]
Henriques, Antonio [1 ]
Pereira, Ana [1 ]
Carneiro, Saul [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Para, Inst Med Sci, Sch Med, Belem, Brazil
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
amantadine; traumatic brain injury; neurotrauma; meta-analysis; placebo; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; PROGESTERONE;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2024.1444623
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Amantadine has been shown to accelerate cognitive and functional brain recovery after cerebrovascular accidents. However, the efficacy of this drug in TBI patients remains poorly defined. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of amantadine in TBI patients. The Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed databases were systematically searched for trials published up to March 24, 2024. Data from previous RCTs were extracted and quality assessed according to Cochrane recommendations. Means and standard deviations with 95% confidence intervals were aggregated across studies. The primary outcomes assessed were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Results From 1,292 database results, 6 studies with 426 patients were included, of which 205 received amantadine (48.12%). The Glasgow Coma Scale score on day 7 (MD 1.50; 95% CI 0.08-2.92; p = 0.038; I2 = 68%) was significantly higher in patients treated with amantadine than those treated with placebo. The Mini Mental State Examination (MD 3.23; 95% CI 0.53-5.94; p = 0.019; I2 = 0%) was also better in patients treated with amantadine. No significant differences in Disability Rating Scale, day 3 GCS, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), length of hospital stay, or duration of mechanical ventilation were observed between amantadine and placebo groups. Conclusion In our analysis, TBI patients benefit from the use of amantadine in the day 7 GCS score and show better results in the MMSE test, but placebo patients benefit from not using amantadine in the DRS between weeks 3 and 4. No other statistically significant results were found related to the use of this medication. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_ record.php?ID=CRD42024538110, CRD42024538110. Conclusion In our analysis, TBI patients benefit from the use of amantadine in the day 7 GCS score and show better results in the MMSE test, but placebo patients benefit from not using amantadine in the DRS between weeks 3 and 4. No other statistically significant results were found related to the use of this medication. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_ record.php?ID=CRD42024538110, CRD42024538110.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hypertonic saline or mannitol for treating elevated intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gu, Jiajie
    Huang, Haoping
    Huang, Yuejun
    Sun, Haitao
    Xu, Hongwu
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 42 (02) : 499 - 509
  • [22] Hypertonic saline or mannitol for treating elevated intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jiajie Gu
    Haoping Huang
    Yuejun Huang
    Haitao Sun
    Hongwu Xu
    Neurosurgical Review, 2019, 42 : 499 - 509
  • [23] Reply to letter-Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury-A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Garg, Kanwaljeet
    Singh, Preet M.
    Singla, Raghav
    Aggarwal, Ankita
    Borle, Anuradha
    Singh, Manmohan
    Chandra, P. Sarat
    Kale, Shashank S.
    Mahapatra, Ashok K.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2020, 68 (05) : 1243 - 1243
  • [24] Renal denervation in hypertension: An updated meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials
    Singh, Sahib
    Rout, Amit
    Garg, Aakash
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 102 (04) : 663 - 671
  • [25] Cetuximab for esophageal cancer: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Ze-Hao
    Ma, Xiao-Wen
    Zhang, Jing
    Li, Xiao
    Lai, Na-Lin
    Zhang, Sheng-Xiao
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [26] Dapoxetine for Premature Ejaculation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Jinhong
    Yuan, Haichao
    Bai, Yunjin
    Pu, Chunxiao
    Tang, Yin
    Dong, Qiang
    Wei, Qiang
    Han, Ping
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (12) : 2003 - 2014
  • [27] Cetuximab for esophageal cancer: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ze-Hao Huang
    Xiao-Wen Ma
    Jing Zhang
    Xiao Li
    Na-Lin Lai
    Sheng-Xiao Zhang
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [28] Brain tissue oxygen plus intracranial pressure monitoring versus isolated intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Pustilnik, Hugo Nunes
    Medrado-Nunes, Gabriel Souza
    Cerqueira, Gabriel Araujo
    Meira, Davi Amorim
    da Cunha, Beatriz Lopes Bernardo
    Porto Junior, Silvio
    Fontes, Jefferson Heber Marques
    da Paz, Matheus Gomes da Silva
    Alcantara, Tancredo
    de Avellar, Leonardo Miranda
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [29] USE OF CISTATRACURIUM IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME: AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Singh, S.
    Sarkar, S.
    Rout, A.
    CHEST, 2020, 157 (06) : 133A - 133A
  • [30] Brain Tissue Oxygen Plus Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Versus Isolated Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Pustilnik, Hugo
    Nunes, Gabriel
    Cerqueira, Gabriel
    Meira, Davi
    da Cunha, Beatriz
    Porto Junior, Silvio
    Fontes, Jefferson
    da Paz, Matheus
    Alcantara, Tancredo
    de Avellar, Leonardo
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 71 : 83 - 83