Hepatic Safety Considerations in the Use of Ulipristal Acetate for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids

被引:0
|
作者
Semmler, Annika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Lange, Maria E. [2 ,3 ]
Drenth, Joost P. H. [4 ]
Vermeer, Niels S. [5 ]
Bet, Pierre M. [5 ]
Huirne, Judith A. F. [3 ]
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam Reprod & Dev Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Locat AMC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam Gastroenterol Endocrinol Metab AGEM, Locat VUMC,Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Pharmacol & Pharm, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
leiomyoma; drug-induced liver injury; safety pharmacology; selective progesterone receptor modulator; pharmacovigilance; ulipristal; INDUCED LIVER-INJURY; OUTCOMES; WOMEN; TRIAL; RISK; MULTICENTER; POPULATION; LEIOMYOMAS; CYP3A4; CELLS;
D O I
10.2147/TCRM.S273358
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Ulipristal acetate (UPA, 5 mg) demonstrated efficacy in symptom reduction for patients with symptomatic fibroids. While registration and post-marketing trials assessing UPA identified few hepatic concerns, post-marketing concerns about potential drug-induced liver injury (DILI) led to significant restrictions, including indication restriction, warning labels and mandatory liver function monitoring. These measures, along with two marketing suspensions, resulted in a decline in UPA use, ultimately leading to the withdrawal of its marketing authorization previously in Canada, Australia, as well as Singapore and in 2024, at the request of the marketing authorization holder for commercial reasons, also for the European Union. Methods: This narrative review critically evaluates the hepatic safety considerations associated with UPA. Results: On reassessment, the risk of severe DILI with UPA is low at 13.5:100.000, with an incidence of 1 in 200,000 for liver transplantation. These numbers are lower than with many other widely prescribed medications, where no regular liver monitoring is recommended. UPA was subjected to strict liver test monitoring although proof of effectiveness of these measures in preventing serious DILI was lacking. While the risk of severe hepatotoxic events is important to consider, a balanced approach to safety measures is needed, particularly in light of the higher risks associated with alternative treatment options such as surgical intervention. Conclusion: While UPA had a unique place in the treatment of uterine fibroids, overly cautious regulatory measures due to exceedingly rare DILI incidences led to the withdrawal of its marketing authorization in most parts of the world. There is a need for an improved understanding of DILI mechanisms and causality assessments to aid in the development of more proportional regulatory responses, balancing patient safety and sustained access to effective innovative treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 382
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics of Ulipristal Acetate for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
    Pohl, Oliver
    Zobrist, R. Howard
    Gotteland, Jean-Pierre
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 22 (04) : 476 - 483
  • [32] Ulipristal acetate compared with leuprorelin acetate for Japanese women with symptomatic uterine fibroids: a phase III randomized controlled trial
    Osuga, Yutaka
    Nakano, Yasuaki
    Yamauchi, Yuji
    Takanashi, Masaya
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (01) : 189 - 197
  • [33] Can ulipristal acetate replace surgical treatment of symptomatic fibroids?
    Koniman, W.
    Davis, B.
    Van Mol, A.
    Watson, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 53 - 53
  • [34] Ulipristal acetate versus GnRH agonists in the treatment of uterine fibroids
    Ene, G.
    Albu, S.
    Stoian, R.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 75 - 76
  • [35] THE RETINOIC ACID PATHWAY IN UTERINE FIBROIDS IS NOT AFFECTED BY ULIPRISTAL ACETATE
    Roura-Monllor, Jaime A.
    Britten, Joy
    Driggers, Paul
    Malik, Minnie
    Catherino, William H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (04) : E316 - E316
  • [36] Ulipristal acetate in symptomatic uterine fibroids. A real-world experience in a multicentric Italian study
    Giarre, Giovanna
    Franchini, Mario
    Castellacci, Eleonora
    Malune, Maria Elena
    Sardo, Attilio Di Spiezio
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Angioni, Stefano
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 36 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [37] Allergan: FDA Accepts NDA for Ulipristal Acetate for Uterine Fibroids
    Fiorentino, Desiree G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (01): : 161 - 162
  • [38] Ulipristal acetate: a novel pharmacological approach for the treatment of uterine fibroids
    Biglia, Nicoletta
    Carinelli, Silvestro
    Maiorana, Antonio
    D'Alonzo, Marta
    Lo Monte, Giuseppe
    Marci, Roberto
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2014, 8 : 285 - 292
  • [39] The Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics of Ulipristal Acetate for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
    Oliver Pohl
    R. Howard Zobrist
    Jean-Pierre Gotteland
    Reproductive Sciences, 2015, 22 : 476 - 483
  • [40] Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ulipristal acetate for the treatment of uterine fibroids
    Ferrero, Simone
    Vellone, Valerio Gaetano
    Barra, Fabio
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 14 (01) : 107 - 116