Hepatic Safety Considerations in the Use of Ulipristal Acetate for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids

被引:0
|
作者
Semmler, Annika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Lange, Maria E. [2 ,3 ]
Drenth, Joost P. H. [4 ]
Vermeer, Niels S. [5 ]
Bet, Pierre M. [5 ]
Huirne, Judith A. F. [3 ]
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam Reprod & Dev Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Locat AMC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam Gastroenterol Endocrinol Metab AGEM, Locat VUMC,Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Pharmacol & Pharm, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
leiomyoma; drug-induced liver injury; safety pharmacology; selective progesterone receptor modulator; pharmacovigilance; ulipristal; INDUCED LIVER-INJURY; OUTCOMES; WOMEN; TRIAL; RISK; MULTICENTER; POPULATION; LEIOMYOMAS; CYP3A4; CELLS;
D O I
10.2147/TCRM.S273358
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Ulipristal acetate (UPA, 5 mg) demonstrated efficacy in symptom reduction for patients with symptomatic fibroids. While registration and post-marketing trials assessing UPA identified few hepatic concerns, post-marketing concerns about potential drug-induced liver injury (DILI) led to significant restrictions, including indication restriction, warning labels and mandatory liver function monitoring. These measures, along with two marketing suspensions, resulted in a decline in UPA use, ultimately leading to the withdrawal of its marketing authorization previously in Canada, Australia, as well as Singapore and in 2024, at the request of the marketing authorization holder for commercial reasons, also for the European Union. Methods: This narrative review critically evaluates the hepatic safety considerations associated with UPA. Results: On reassessment, the risk of severe DILI with UPA is low at 13.5:100.000, with an incidence of 1 in 200,000 for liver transplantation. These numbers are lower than with many other widely prescribed medications, where no regular liver monitoring is recommended. UPA was subjected to strict liver test monitoring although proof of effectiveness of these measures in preventing serious DILI was lacking. While the risk of severe hepatotoxic events is important to consider, a balanced approach to safety measures is needed, particularly in light of the higher risks associated with alternative treatment options such as surgical intervention. Conclusion: While UPA had a unique place in the treatment of uterine fibroids, overly cautious regulatory measures due to exceedingly rare DILI incidences led to the withdrawal of its marketing authorization in most parts of the world. There is a need for an improved understanding of DILI mechanisms and causality assessments to aid in the development of more proportional regulatory responses, balancing patient safety and sustained access to effective innovative treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 382
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in sexuality during ulipristal acetate treatment in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids
    Tuschy, Benjamin
    Gabbert, Mirja
    Weiss, Christel
    Hornemann, Amadeus
    Wuhrer, Anne
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Berlit, Sebastian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 228 : 106 - 110
  • [22] does ulipristal acetate administration for symptomatic uterine fibroids impact ovarian reserve?
    Raga, F.
    Moscardo, I.
    Cholvi, S.
    Pascual, C.
    Llinares, C.
    Boigues, D.
    Martinez, C.
    Carratala, A.
    Cano, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 427 - 428
  • [23] Management of symptomatic uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate: A retrospective, multicentric and nationwide study
    Aguas, Fernanda
    Guerreiro, Fernando
    Ponte, Carlos
    Gomes, Carolina
    Martinho, Margarida
    Vilhena, Vera
    Silva, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 49 (08)
  • [24] Ulipristal Acetate versus Leuprolide Acetate for Uterine Fibroids
    Donnez, Jacques
    Tomaszewski, Janusz
    Vazquez, Francisco
    Bouchard, Philippe
    Lemieszczuk, Boguslav
    Baro, Francesco
    Nouri, Kazem
    Selvaggi, Luigi
    Sodowski, Krzysztof
    Bestel, Elke
    Terrill, Paul
    Osterloh, Ian
    Loumaye, Ernest
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (05): : 421 - 432
  • [25] Safety of treatment of uterine fibroids with the selective progesterone receptor modulator, ulipristal acetate
    Donnez, Jacques
    Donnez, Olivier
    Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 15 (12) : 1679 - 1686
  • [26] Medical treatment with ulipristal acetate for uterine fibroids: Will it be resurrected?
    Liu, James H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (01) : 80 - 80
  • [27] Application of ulipristal acetate in female patients with uterine fibroids
    Grzechocinska, Barbara
    Gadomska, Halina
    Zygula, Aleksandra
    Wielgos, Miroslaw
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 35 (03) : 175 - 178
  • [28] Role of ethnicity in treating uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate
    Murji, Ally
    Crosier, Rebecca
    Chow, Tiffany
    Ye, Xiang Y.
    Shirreff, Lindsay
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (05) : 1165 - 1169
  • [29] Incorporating ulipristal acetate in the care of symptomatic uterine fibroids: a Canadian costutility analysis of pharmacotherapy management
    Tsoi, Bernice
    Blackhouse, Gord
    Ferrazzi, Simon
    Reade, Clare J.
    Chen, Innie
    Goeree, Ron
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 7 : 213 - 225