Optimizing Battery Charge Prediction Accuracy Utilizing Machine Learning Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Manimegalai, R. [1 ]
Sivakumar, S. [2 ]
Haidari, Moazzam [3 ]
Bheemalingaiah, M. [4 ]
Balaramesh, P. [5 ]
Yadav, Loya Chandrajit [6 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Sch Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Chennai, India
[2] Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Inst Sci & T, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
[3] Saharsa Coll Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Saharsa, Bihar, India
[4] JB Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Hyderabad, India
[5] RMK Engn Coll, Dept Sci & Humanities, Kavaraipettai, India
[6] Koneru Lakshmaiah Educ Fdn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Vaddeswaram, Vijayawada, India
关键词
Machine Learning; Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Shapley Additive Explanations; Lithium-Ion Batteries; Energy Storage Systems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Energy storage systems are more cost-effective when they correctly manage the capacity for lithium-ion batteries (LiBs), especially when they are used on a big scale. The design saves money, in the long run, to repair or fix LiBs less often. To determine the amount that LiBs were capable of holding, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), category boosting (CatBoost), as well as ensemble learning models are utilized. Employing the mean absolute error (MAE), and the mean squared error (MSE) along R2 numbers, the researcher compared the accuracy with which each model could predict future outcomes. For example, the LightGBM model had the least MAE (0.102) as well as MSE (0.018) values, as well as the greatest R-squared (0.886) value, which means that its predictions were most closely related to reality. It was about the same in terms of speed among the gradient boosting as well as XGBoost models, which came next to LightGBM. The ensemble model's efficiency suggests that integrating many models might result in an overall increase in performance. In addition, the research uses Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values to analyze important aspects influencing model predictions within the context of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). This study found that discharge capacity is strongly influenced by temperature, cycle index, voltage, and power. This study demonstrates that Machine Learning (ML) methods can improve energy storage systems and regulate LiB in XAI.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 248
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Utilizing Selected Machine Learning Methods for Conicity Prediction in the Process of Producing Radial Tires for Passenger Cars
    Majewski, Wojciech
    Dostatni, Ewa
    Diakun, Jacek
    Mikolajewski, Dariusz
    Rojek, Izabela
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (15):
  • [32] Enhanced efficiency prediction of an electrified off-highway vehicle transmission utilizing machine learning methods
    Lukas, Bauer
    Patrick, Beck
    Leon, Stuetz
    Markus, Kley
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 417 - 426
  • [33] A machine learning technique for optimizing load demand prediction within air conditioning systems utilizing GRU/IASO model
    He, Meng
    Wang, Hui
    Thwin, Myo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [34] ContraDRG: Automatic Partial Charge Prediction by Machine Learning
    Martin, Roman
    Heider, Dominik
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2019, 10
  • [35] A survey on machine learning methods for churn prediction
    Louis Geiler
    Séverine Affeldt
    Mohamed Nadif
    International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 2022, 14 : 217 - 242
  • [36] Machine learning methods for metabolic pathway prediction
    Joseph M Dale
    Liviu Popescu
    Peter D Karp
    BMC Bioinformatics, 11 (1)
  • [37] Machine Learning Methods for Quality Prediction in Production
    Sankhye, Sidharth
    Hu, Guiping
    LOGISTICS-BASEL, 2020, 4 (04):
  • [38] Machine learning methods for metabolic pathway prediction
    Dale, Joseph M.
    Popescu, Liviu
    Karp, Peter D.
    BMC Bioinformatics, 2010, 11
  • [39] Machine Learning Methods for Septic Shock Prediction
    Darwiche, Aiman
    Mukherjee, Sumitra
    AIVR 2018: 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND VIRTUAL REALITY, 2018, : 104 - 110
  • [40] Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods
    Dimitrov, Ivan
    Zaharieva, Nevena
    Doytchinova, Irini
    VACCINES, 2020, 8 (04) : 1 - 10