Optimizing Battery Charge Prediction Accuracy Utilizing Machine Learning Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Manimegalai, R. [1 ]
Sivakumar, S. [2 ]
Haidari, Moazzam [3 ]
Bheemalingaiah, M. [4 ]
Balaramesh, P. [5 ]
Yadav, Loya Chandrajit [6 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Sch Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Chennai, India
[2] Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Inst Sci & T, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
[3] Saharsa Coll Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Saharsa, Bihar, India
[4] JB Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Hyderabad, India
[5] RMK Engn Coll, Dept Sci & Humanities, Kavaraipettai, India
[6] Koneru Lakshmaiah Educ Fdn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Vaddeswaram, Vijayawada, India
关键词
Machine Learning; Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Shapley Additive Explanations; Lithium-Ion Batteries; Energy Storage Systems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Energy storage systems are more cost-effective when they correctly manage the capacity for lithium-ion batteries (LiBs), especially when they are used on a big scale. The design saves money, in the long run, to repair or fix LiBs less often. To determine the amount that LiBs were capable of holding, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), category boosting (CatBoost), as well as ensemble learning models are utilized. Employing the mean absolute error (MAE), and the mean squared error (MSE) along R2 numbers, the researcher compared the accuracy with which each model could predict future outcomes. For example, the LightGBM model had the least MAE (0.102) as well as MSE (0.018) values, as well as the greatest R-squared (0.886) value, which means that its predictions were most closely related to reality. It was about the same in terms of speed among the gradient boosting as well as XGBoost models, which came next to LightGBM. The ensemble model's efficiency suggests that integrating many models might result in an overall increase in performance. In addition, the research uses Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values to analyze important aspects influencing model predictions within the context of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). This study found that discharge capacity is strongly influenced by temperature, cycle index, voltage, and power. This study demonstrates that Machine Learning (ML) methods can improve energy storage systems and regulate LiB in XAI.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 248
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Utilizing Machine Learning Methods for Preoperative Prediction of Postsurgical Mortality and Intensive Care Unit Admission
    Chiew, Calvin J.
    Liu, Nan
    Wong, Ting Hway
    Sim, Yilin E.
    Abdullah, Hairil R.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (06) : 1133 - 1139
  • [22] Overview of Machine Learning Methods for Lithium-Ion Battery Remaining Useful Lifetime Prediction
    Jin, Siyu
    Sui, Xin
    Huang, Xinrong
    Wang, Shunli
    Teodorescu, Remus
    Stroe, Daniel-Ioan
    ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (24)
  • [23] Comparison of prediction performance of lithium titanate oxide battery discharge capacity with machine learning methods
    Andik, Ilyas
    Arslan, Fatma Yasemin
    Uysal, Ali
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [24] Utilizing machine learning and deep learning for enhanced supercapacitor performance prediction
    Emad-Eldeen, Ahmed
    Azim, Mohamed A.
    Abdelsattar, Montaser
    AbdelMoety, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 100
  • [25] Machine learning and impedance spectroscopy for battery state of charge evaluation
    Stighezza, Mattia
    Ferrero, Roberto
    Bianchi, Valentina
    De Munari, Ilaria
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR AUTOMOTIVE, METROAUTOMOTIVE, 2023, : 24 - 29
  • [26] Optimizing prosumers' battery energy storage management using machine learning
    Voigt, Nico
    Wawer, Tim
    Albert, Till
    2019 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2019,
  • [27] Utilizing Machine Learning to Advance Battery Materials Design: Challenges and Prospects
    Manna, Souvik
    Paul, Poulami
    Manna, Surya Sekhar
    Das, Sandeep
    Pathak, Biswarup
    CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS, 2025, 37 (05) : 1759 - 1787
  • [28] Using Machine Learning for Quantum Annealing Accuracy Prediction
    Barbosa, Aaron
    Pelofske, Elijah
    Hahn, Georg
    Djidjev, Hristo N.
    ALGORITHMS, 2021, 14 (06)
  • [29] Improving the Machine Learning Prediction Accuracy with Clustering Discretization
    Gao, Chunlan
    Zhang, Yanqing
    Lo, Dan
    Shi, Yong
    Huang, Jian
    2022 IEEE 12TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE (CCWC), 2022, : 513 - 517
  • [30] Comment on "Utilizing Machine Learning Methods for Preoperative Prediction of Postsurgical Mortality and Intensive Care Unit Admission''
    Bellini, Valentina
    Petroni, Alberto
    Mordonini, Monica
    Del Rio, Paolo
    Marinangeli, Franco
    Bignami, Elena
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (06) : E137 - E138