Evaluation of Spray Drift from an Electric Boom Sprayer: Impact of Boom Height and Nozzle Type

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Xiaoyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Shuo [2 ,3 ]
Gao, Yuanyuan [4 ]
Wang, Zhichong [5 ,6 ]
Zhai, Changyuan [3 ,5 ]
Qiu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Nanjing 210031, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Informat Technol Res Ctr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Engn Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Intelligent Equipment Res Ctr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[6] China Agr Univ, Coll Agr Unmanned Syst, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
spray drift control; boom sprayer; nozzle; boom height; droplet velocity; droplet size; TEST BENCH; AIR; DROPLETS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy15010160
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the Huang-Huai-Hai region of China, the instability of electric boom sprayers has prompted many farmers to raise the boom height to improve clearance. However, the drift risks associated with these conditions remain poorly assessed. This study investigated two key factors influencing drift: boom height and nozzle type. The standard LI CHENG VP11003 nozzle was compared to the Teejet XR11003 nozzle, and droplet size and velocity were measured at various boom heights. The results showed that, at the same boom height, the LI CHENG nozzle produced droplets with an average D[V, 0.5] 14.6 mu m larger (8.13%), an average velocity 0.53 m/s lower (29.26%), and a relative span (RS) value 0.05 higher (4.52%) compared to the Teejet nozzle. Drift tests were performed under field conditions using a spray drift test bench. The results showed that the total drift amount per unit area (TDA) for the LI CHENG nozzle showed minimal variation at boom heights of 0.4-0.6 m (Stage 1), 0.7-0.9 m (Stage 2), and 1.0-1.2 m (Stage 3). The drift potential of the LI CHENG VP11003 nozzle increased by 136.62% in Stage 2 and 282.69% in Stage 3, relative to Stage 1. Similarly, the Teejet XR11003 nozzle showed increases of 30.52% and 165.51% in Stages 2 and 3, respectively. The results showed that the LICHENG nozzle, which is the standard equipment on the sprayer, can only be used to moderately increase the boom height to improve the sprayer's clearance within the range of the first stage. When the boom height exceeds this range, the drift risk becomes too high. This study provides meaningful insights into enhancing drift control and developing application strategies for growers.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spray deposition and losses in potato as a function of air-assistance and sprayer boom angle
    Seudeler, Fabio
    Gilberto Raetano, Carlos
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2006, 63 (06): : 515 - 521
  • [42] Assessment of pesticide drift and deposition downwind of ground spray applications: A case study examining the impact of droplet size, boom height, and wind speed
    Londergan, Richard J.
    Newcombe, A. C.
    Wolf, Thomas M.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [43] Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers
    Miller, PCH
    Ellis, MCB
    CROP PROTECTION, 2000, 19 (8-10) : 609 - 615
  • [44] A novel method for testing automatic systems for controlling the spray boom height
    Herbst, Andreas
    Osteroth, Hans-Juergen
    Stendel, Hartje
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2018, 174 : 115 - 125
  • [45] Spray Boom Height Intelligent Adjustment System Based on Expert Control
    Sun X.
    Yang X.
    Dong X.
    Zhang T.
    Yan H.
    Wang Z.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51 : 275 - 282
  • [46] EFFECT OF ROLL ANGLE AND NOZZLE SPRAY PATTERN ON THE UNIFORMITY OF SPRAY VOLUME DISTRIBUTION BELOW A BOOM
    MAWER, CJ
    MILLER, PCH
    CROP PROTECTION, 1989, 8 (03) : 217 - 222
  • [47] SPRAY DRIFT AND RECOVERY AS AFFECTED BY SPRAY THICKENER, NOZZLE TYPE, AND NOZZLE PRESSURE
    BODE, LE
    BUTLER, BJ
    GOERING, CE
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1976, 19 (02): : 213 - 218
  • [48] Determination of drift potential of different flat fan nozzles on a boom sprayer using a test bench
    Gil, Emilio
    Balsari, Paolo
    Gallart, Montserrat
    Llorens, Jordi
    Marucco, Paolo
    Andersen, Per Gummer
    Fabregas, Xavier
    Llop, Jordi
    CROP PROTECTION, 2014, 56 : 58 - 68
  • [49] A coupled atomization-spray drift model as online support tool for boom spray applications
    Renaudo, Carlos A.
    Bertin, Diego E.
    Bucala, Veronica
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2022, 23 (06) : 2345 - 2371
  • [50] A coupled atomization-spray drift model as online support tool for boom spray applications
    Carlos A. Renaudo
    Diego E. Bertin
    Verónica Bucalá
    Precision Agriculture, 2022, 23 : 2345 - 2371