Evaluation of Spray Drift from an Electric Boom Sprayer: Impact of Boom Height and Nozzle Type

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Xiaoyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Shuo [2 ,3 ]
Gao, Yuanyuan [4 ]
Wang, Zhichong [5 ,6 ]
Zhai, Changyuan [3 ,5 ]
Qiu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Nanjing 210031, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Informat Technol Res Ctr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Engn Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Intelligent Equipment Res Ctr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[6] China Agr Univ, Coll Agr Unmanned Syst, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
spray drift control; boom sprayer; nozzle; boom height; droplet velocity; droplet size; TEST BENCH; AIR; DROPLETS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy15010160
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the Huang-Huai-Hai region of China, the instability of electric boom sprayers has prompted many farmers to raise the boom height to improve clearance. However, the drift risks associated with these conditions remain poorly assessed. This study investigated two key factors influencing drift: boom height and nozzle type. The standard LI CHENG VP11003 nozzle was compared to the Teejet XR11003 nozzle, and droplet size and velocity were measured at various boom heights. The results showed that, at the same boom height, the LI CHENG nozzle produced droplets with an average D[V, 0.5] 14.6 mu m larger (8.13%), an average velocity 0.53 m/s lower (29.26%), and a relative span (RS) value 0.05 higher (4.52%) compared to the Teejet nozzle. Drift tests were performed under field conditions using a spray drift test bench. The results showed that the total drift amount per unit area (TDA) for the LI CHENG nozzle showed minimal variation at boom heights of 0.4-0.6 m (Stage 1), 0.7-0.9 m (Stage 2), and 1.0-1.2 m (Stage 3). The drift potential of the LI CHENG VP11003 nozzle increased by 136.62% in Stage 2 and 282.69% in Stage 3, relative to Stage 1. Similarly, the Teejet XR11003 nozzle showed increases of 30.52% and 165.51% in Stages 2 and 3, respectively. The results showed that the LICHENG nozzle, which is the standard equipment on the sprayer, can only be used to moderately increase the boom height to improve the sprayer's clearance within the range of the first stage. When the boom height exceeds this range, the drift risk becomes too high. This study provides meaningful insights into enhancing drift control and developing application strategies for growers.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Online control system of spray boom height and balance
    Wei, Xinhua
    Shao, Jing
    Miao, Dandan
    Li, Lin
    Xie, Xiaowei
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46 (08): : 66 - 71
  • [32] COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF A HYDRAULIC BOOM AND COMPRESSED-AIR BOOM SPRAYER FOR SPRAY COVERAGE AND CONTROL OF LEAFHOPPERS AND BLIGHT IN CARROTS
    FISHER, RW
    MENZIES, DR
    SUTTON, JC
    STEVENSON, AB
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO, 1980, 111 : 3 - 6
  • [33] DETERMINATION OF SPRAY DRIFT CHARACTERISTICS OF A RONNIE BAUGH TRACTOR-TRAILED BOOM SPRAYER USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
    Laguardia, Abel Francis B.
    Fajardo, Arthur L.
    Zubia, Omar F.
    Valencia, Ronnie C.
    Gallegos, Ralph Kristoffer B.
    ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2023, 43 (05):
  • [34] Effects of lowering spray boom in flight on swath width and drift
    Hoffmann, WC
    Tom, HH
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2000, 16 (03) : 217 - 220
  • [35] Optimization of a Boom Height Ultrasonic Detecting Model for the Whole Growth Cycle of Wheat: Affected by the Oscillation of the Three-Section Boom of the Sprayer
    Wu, Jianguo
    Yang, Shuo
    Gao, Yuanyuan
    Pan, Xiaoyong
    Zou, Wei
    Wei, Yibo
    Zhai, Changyuan
    Chen, Liping
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [36] Sprayer boom height measurement in wheat field using ultrasonic sensor: An exploratory study
    Zhao, Xueguan
    Zhai, Changyuan
    Wang, Songlin
    Dou, Hanjie
    Yang, Shuo
    Wang, Xiu
    Chen, Lipin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [37] Design and test of high clearance boom-tunnel type sprayer
    Yuan, Jin
    Zhao, Xinxue
    Li, Ming
    Yan, Xiaohai
    Liu, Xuemei
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31 : 60 - 68
  • [38] Impact of Auto-Swath Technology on Agricultural Sprayer Boom Dynamics
    Fulton, John P.
    Sharda, Ajay
    McDonald, T. P.
    Zech, W. C.
    Darr, Matthew J.
    CONFERENCE: AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING - LAND-TECHNIK AGENG 2009: INNOVATIONS TO MEET FUTURE CHALLENGES, 2009, 2060 : 129 - 134
  • [39] Spray Deposition and Distribution on Rice as Affected by a Boom Sprayer with a Canopy-Opening Device
    Jing, Linlong
    Wei, Xinhua
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [40] Reconfigurability Evaluation of Multifunctional Intelligent Boom Sprayer Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation
    Ma, Luqiang
    Xu, Youlin
    Zheng, Jiaqiang
    Dai, Xiang
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020