Evaluation of Spray Drift from an Electric Boom Sprayer: Impact of Boom Height and Nozzle Type

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Xiaoyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Shuo [2 ,3 ]
Gao, Yuanyuan [4 ]
Wang, Zhichong [5 ,6 ]
Zhai, Changyuan [3 ,5 ]
Qiu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Nanjing 210031, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Informat Technol Res Ctr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Engn Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Intelligent Equipment Res Ctr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[6] China Agr Univ, Coll Agr Unmanned Syst, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
spray drift control; boom sprayer; nozzle; boom height; droplet velocity; droplet size; TEST BENCH; AIR; DROPLETS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy15010160
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the Huang-Huai-Hai region of China, the instability of electric boom sprayers has prompted many farmers to raise the boom height to improve clearance. However, the drift risks associated with these conditions remain poorly assessed. This study investigated two key factors influencing drift: boom height and nozzle type. The standard LI CHENG VP11003 nozzle was compared to the Teejet XR11003 nozzle, and droplet size and velocity were measured at various boom heights. The results showed that, at the same boom height, the LI CHENG nozzle produced droplets with an average D[V, 0.5] 14.6 mu m larger (8.13%), an average velocity 0.53 m/s lower (29.26%), and a relative span (RS) value 0.05 higher (4.52%) compared to the Teejet nozzle. Drift tests were performed under field conditions using a spray drift test bench. The results showed that the total drift amount per unit area (TDA) for the LI CHENG nozzle showed minimal variation at boom heights of 0.4-0.6 m (Stage 1), 0.7-0.9 m (Stage 2), and 1.0-1.2 m (Stage 3). The drift potential of the LI CHENG VP11003 nozzle increased by 136.62% in Stage 2 and 282.69% in Stage 3, relative to Stage 1. Similarly, the Teejet XR11003 nozzle showed increases of 30.52% and 165.51% in Stages 2 and 3, respectively. The results showed that the LICHENG nozzle, which is the standard equipment on the sprayer, can only be used to moderately increase the boom height to improve the sprayer's clearance within the range of the first stage. When the boom height exceeds this range, the drift risk becomes too high. This study provides meaningful insights into enhancing drift control and developing application strategies for growers.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of sprayer boom height on spray drift
    De Jong, A
    Michielsen, JMGP
    Stallinga, H
    Van de Zande, JC
    52ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CROP PROTECTION, PTS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 65 (2A-B): : 919 - 930
  • [2] Field-crop-sprayer potential drift measured using test bench: Effects of boom height and nozzle type
    Balsari, Paolo
    Gil, Emilio
    Marucco, Paolo
    van de Zande, Jan C.
    Nuyttens, David
    Herbst, Andreas
    Gallart, Montserrat
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2017, 154 : 3 - 13
  • [3] SHIELDED SPRAYER BOOM TO REDUCE DRIFT
    SMITH, DB
    HARRIS, FD
    BUTLER, BJ
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1982, 25 (05): : 1136 - &
  • [4] The effect of boom section and nozzle configuration on the risk of spray drift
    Murphy, SD
    Miller, PCH
    Parkin, CS
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2000, 75 (02): : 127 - 137
  • [5] Spray Deposition and Weed Control using a Conventional Boom Sprayer and an Auxiliary Boom Sprayer, with Reduced Spray Volumes
    Bueno, M. R.
    Cunha, J. P. A. R.
    Naves, M. G.
    Tavares, R. M.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2014, 32 (02) : 447 - 454
  • [6] Spray Boom Height Control System of Potato Sprayer Based on Canopy Information
    Wang X.
    Qu J.
    Xu Y.
    Li X.
    Xiao Z.
    Wang L.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2023, 54 (09): : 198 - 207
  • [7] The effect of boom height and high operating pressure on nozzle spray distribution
    Khdair, A.I., 2001, Institution of Engineers (India) (82):
  • [8] Modelling spray drift from boom sprayers
    Holterman, HJ
    van de Zande, JC
    Porskamp, HAJ
    Huijsmans, JFM
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 1997, 19 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [9] EFFECTS OF BOOM HEIGHT, WORKING PRESSURE AND WIND SPEED ON SPRAY DRIFT
    NORDBY, A
    SKUTERUD, R
    WEED RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (06) : 385 - &
  • [10] BREAM: A probabilistic Bystander and Resident Exposure Assessment Model of spray drift from an agricultural boom sprayer
    Kennedy, Marc C.
    Ellis, M. Clare Butler
    Miller, Paul C. H.
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 88 : 63 - 71