Inference for Optimal Linear Treatment Regimes in Personalized Decision-making

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Yuwen [1 ]
Yang, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
关键词
BOOTSTRAP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Personalized decision-making, tailored to individual characteristics, is gaining significant attention. The optimal treatment regime aims to provide the best-expected outcome in the entire population, known as the value function. One approach to determine this optimal regime is by maximizing the Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) estimator of the value function. However, the derived treatment regime can be intricate and nonlinear, limiting their use. For clarity and interoperability, we emphasize linear regimes and determine the optimal linear regime by optimizing the AIPW estimator within set constraints. While the AIPW estimator offers a viable path to estimating the optimal regime, current methodologies predominantly focus on its asymptotic distribution, leaving a gap in studying the linear regime itself. However, there are many benefits to understanding the regime, as pinpointing significant covariates can enhance treatment effects and provide future clinical guidance. In this paper, we explore the asymptotic distribution of the estimated linear regime. Our results show that the parameter associated with the linear regime follows a cube-root convergence to a non-normal limiting distribution characterized by the maximizer of a centered Gaussian process with a quadratic drift. When making inferences for the estimated linear regimes with cube-root convergence in practical scenarios, the standard nonparametric bootstrap is invalid. As a solution, we facilitate the Cattaneo et al. [2020] bootstrap technique to provide a consistent distributional approximation for the estimated linear regimes, validated further through simulations and real-world data applications from the eICU Collaborative Research Database.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 735
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal Decision-Making in a Captive Users Context
    Kibangou, A. Y.
    Kalaoane, R. C.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (25): : 144 - 149
  • [42] DECISION-MAKING WITH LINEAR PARTIAL INFORMATION (LPI)
    KOFLER, E
    KMIETOWICZ, ZW
    PEARMAN, AD
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1984, 35 (12) : 1079 - 1090
  • [43] Clinical trials and decision-making strategies for optimal treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer
    Ledermann, Jonathan A.
    Raja, Fharat A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S104 - S115
  • [44] DECISION-MAKING IN MILL OPERATIONS WITH LINEAR PROGRAMMING
    TILLMAN, FA
    WARD, A
    SMITH, LM
    CEREAL SCIENCE TODAY, 1970, 15 (06): : 176 - &
  • [45] ROBUSTNESS OF LINEAR-MODELS FOR DECISION-MAKING
    ASHTON, RH
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1976, 4 (05): : 609 - 615
  • [46] Advanced diagnostics in inflammatory cardiomyopathy for personalized therapeutic decision-making
    Schultheiss, Heinz-Peter
    Escher, Felicitas
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (36) : 3474 - 3476
  • [47] A Personalized Shared Decision-Making Tool for Osteoarthritis Management of the Knee
    Johnson, Charla B.
    ORTHOPAEDIC NURSING, 2021, 40 (02) : 64 - 70
  • [48] Design of Decision-making Process Based Personalized Recommendation System
    Ya, Luo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS (ICCITA), 2016, 53 : 60 - 67
  • [49] Personalized decision-making for acute cholecystitis: Understanding surgeon judgment
    Filiberto, Amanda C. C.
    Efron, Philip A. A.
    Frantz, Amanda
    Bihorac, Azra
    Upchurch, Gilbert R. R.
    Loftus, Tyler J. J.
    FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4
  • [50] Improving personalized treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: The necessity of eliciting patient preferences
    Richardson, Daniel R.
    Loh, Kah Poh
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (01) : 1 - 3