Inference for Optimal Linear Treatment Regimes in Personalized Decision-making

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Yuwen [1 ]
Yang, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
关键词
BOOTSTRAP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Personalized decision-making, tailored to individual characteristics, is gaining significant attention. The optimal treatment regime aims to provide the best-expected outcome in the entire population, known as the value function. One approach to determine this optimal regime is by maximizing the Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) estimator of the value function. However, the derived treatment regime can be intricate and nonlinear, limiting their use. For clarity and interoperability, we emphasize linear regimes and determine the optimal linear regime by optimizing the AIPW estimator within set constraints. While the AIPW estimator offers a viable path to estimating the optimal regime, current methodologies predominantly focus on its asymptotic distribution, leaving a gap in studying the linear regime itself. However, there are many benefits to understanding the regime, as pinpointing significant covariates can enhance treatment effects and provide future clinical guidance. In this paper, we explore the asymptotic distribution of the estimated linear regime. Our results show that the parameter associated with the linear regime follows a cube-root convergence to a non-normal limiting distribution characterized by the maximizer of a centered Gaussian process with a quadratic drift. When making inferences for the estimated linear regimes with cube-root convergence in practical scenarios, the standard nonparametric bootstrap is invalid. As a solution, we facilitate the Cattaneo et al. [2020] bootstrap technique to provide a consistent distributional approximation for the estimated linear regimes, validated further through simulations and real-world data applications from the eICU Collaborative Research Database.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 735
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceptual Decision-Making as Probabilistic Inference by Neural Sampling
    Haefner, Ralf M.
    Berkes, Pietro
    Fiser, Jozsef
    NEURON, 2016, 90 (03) : 649 - 660
  • [22] A Biased Bayesian Inference for Decision-Making and Cognitive Control
    Matsumori, Kaosu
    Koike, Yasuharu
    Matsumoto, Kenji
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [23] Surgical decision-making: Integrating evidence, inference, and experience
    Marshall, JC
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 86 (01) : 201 - +
  • [24] Neural circuits for inference-based decision-making
    Wang, Fang
    Kahnt, Thorsten
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2021, 41 : 10 - 14
  • [25] High-dimensional inference for personalized treatment decision
    Jeng, X. Jessie
    Lu, Wenbin
    Peng, Huimin
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2018, 12 (01): : 2074 - 2089
  • [27] Optimal distribution of organizational decision-making power based on matching of knowledge and decision-making power
    Shan, Haiyan
    Wang, Wenping
    Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2007, 37 (06): : 1117 - 1121
  • [28] Bayesian inference for optimal dynamic treatment regimes in practice
    Duque, Daniel Rodriguez
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    Stephens, David A. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2023, 19 (02): : 309 - 331
  • [29] Selection of the optimal solution of the decision-making problem
    Borovcova, Martina
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF FIRMS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: 11TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, PTS I-III, 2017, : 87 - 95
  • [30] The design of an optimal decision-making algorithm for fertilization
    Wang, Jianlun
    Dong, Jinyong
    Wang, Yongbin
    He, Jianlei
    Changqi, Ouyang
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2011, 54 (3-4) : 1100 - 1106