Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) Scoring System to Detect Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Mourato, Felipe A. [1 ]
Schmitt, Luiza G. [2 ]
Mariussi, Miriana [3 ]
Torri, Giovanni [4 ]
Altmayer, Stephan [5 ]
Giganti, Francesco [6 ,7 ]
Abreu-Gomez, Jorge [8 ,9 ]
Perlis, Nathan [10 ]
Berlin, Alejandro [11 ,12 ]
Ghai, Sangeet [8 ,9 ]
Haider, Masoom A. [8 ,9 ]
Dias, Adriano B. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Univ Fed Pernambuco, Empresa Brasileira Serv Hosp, Unidade Diagnost Imagem, Recife, Brazil
[2] UT Southwestern, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Hosp Univ Austral, Dept Phamacy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Hosp Univ Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[7] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[8] Univ Toronto, Univ Med Imaging Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Sinai Hlth Syst,Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Womens Coll Hosp, Sinai Hlth Syst,Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[12] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate Imaging for Recurrence; Reporting (PI-RR); Reporting system; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; LOCAL RECURRENCE; ACCURACY; QUALITY; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) was introduced in 2021 to standardize the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer following whole-gland treatment. The system scores image on a scale from 1 to 5 and has shown promising results in single- center studies. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of the PI-RR system in predicting the likelihood of local recurrence after whole-gland treatment. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for diagnostic test accuracy were followed. Relevant databases were searched up to December 2023. Primary studies met the eligibility criteria if they reported MRI diagnostic performance in prostate cancer recurrence using PI-RR. Diagnostic performance for MRI was assessed using two different cutoff points (>3 or >4 for positivity according to the PI-RR system). A meta-analysis with a random- effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity values. Key findings and limitations: Sixteen articles were identified for full-text reading, of which six were considered eligible, involving a total of 467 patients. Using a cutoff of PI-RR >3 (4 studies) for recurrent disease, the sensitivity was 77.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.9-84.1%) and the specificity was 80.2% (95% CI 58.2-92.2%). Using a cutoff of PI-RR >4 (4 studies), the sensitivity was 61.9% (95% CI 35.6-82.7%) and the specificity was 86.6% (95% CI 75.1-93.3%). Overall, the inter-rater agreement varied from fair to excellent. Conclusions and clinical implications: PI-RR is accurate in detecting local recurrence after whole-gland treatment for prostate cancer and shows fair-to-good to excellent inter-reader agreement. Overall, a PI-RR cutoff of >= 3 showed high sensitivity and specificity. Patient summary: We reviewed studies that reported on how good MRI scans using a scoring system called PI-RR were in detecting recurrence of prostate cancer. We found that this system shows good performance, with fair to excellent agreement between dif- ferent radiologists. (c) 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1246 / 1254
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The utility of PET-based imaging for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sathianathen, Niranjan J.
    Butaney, Mohit
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (07) : 1239 - 1249
  • [42] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Informed Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy Naive Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Ahmad, Ardalan E.
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Klotz, Laurence
    Emberton, Mark
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Arora, Karan
    Fleshner, Neil
    Finelli, Antonio
    Perlis, Nathan
    Tyson, Mark D.
    Klaassen, Zachary
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (06): : 1085 - 1092
  • [43] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Stabile, Armando
    Neves, Joana B.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Valerio, Massimo
    Shanmugabavan, Yaalini
    Clement, Keiran D.
    Sarkar, Debashis
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Thurtle, David
    Deeks, Jonathan
    Emberton, Mark
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Moore, Caroline M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (03) : 284 - 303
  • [44] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Petrides, Neophytos
    Giganti, Francesco
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Klotz, Laurence
    Villers, Arnauld
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Moore, Caroline M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) : 627 - 636
  • [45] Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management: a systematic review
    Monni, Fabio
    Fontanella, Paolo
    Grasso, Angelica
    Wiklund, Peter
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    Randazzo, Marco
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Montanari, Emanuele
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2017, 69 (06) : 567 - 578
  • [46] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Haider, M. A.
    Yao, X.
    Loblaw, A.
    Finelli, A.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 550 - 567
  • [47] Relationship of prostate cancer topography and tumour conspicuity on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Satish, Pranav
    Freeman, Alex
    Kelly, Daniel
    Kirkham, Alex
    Orczyk, Clement
    Simpson, Benjamin S.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Whitaker, Hayley C.
    Emberton, Mark
    Norris, Joseph M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [48] Accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Zheng, Yi
    Ji, Guanghai
    Liu, Xinxin
    Li, Peng
    Cai, Lei
    Guo, Yulin
    Yang, Jian
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (44) : 77975 - 77989
  • [49] The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kato, Daiki
    Ozawa, Kaori
    Takeuchi, Shinichi
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kawase, Kota
    Nakai, Chie
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Nakane, Keita
    Kato, Hiroki
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    Suzui, Natsuko
    Miyazaki, Tatsuhiko
    Koie, Takuya
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 1294 - 1301
  • [50] Optimizing prostate cancer detection in transition zone: an analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate magnetic resonance imaging evaluation with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessment
    Imai, Yu
    Urabe, Fumihiko
    Sadakane, Ibuki
    Oguchi, Takahiro
    Iwatani, Kosuke
    Murakami, Masaya
    Tashiro, Kojiro
    Aoki, Manabu
    Sato, Shun
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    Tsuzuki, Shunsuke
    Miki, Kenta
    Kimura, Takahiro
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (09)