Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) Scoring System to Detect Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Mourato, Felipe A. [1 ]
Schmitt, Luiza G. [2 ]
Mariussi, Miriana [3 ]
Torri, Giovanni [4 ]
Altmayer, Stephan [5 ]
Giganti, Francesco [6 ,7 ]
Abreu-Gomez, Jorge [8 ,9 ]
Perlis, Nathan [10 ]
Berlin, Alejandro [11 ,12 ]
Ghai, Sangeet [8 ,9 ]
Haider, Masoom A. [8 ,9 ]
Dias, Adriano B. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Univ Fed Pernambuco, Empresa Brasileira Serv Hosp, Unidade Diagnost Imagem, Recife, Brazil
[2] UT Southwestern, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Hosp Univ Austral, Dept Phamacy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Hosp Univ Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[7] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[8] Univ Toronto, Univ Med Imaging Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Sinai Hlth Syst,Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Womens Coll Hosp, Sinai Hlth Syst,Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[12] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate Imaging for Recurrence; Reporting (PI-RR); Reporting system; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; LOCAL RECURRENCE; ACCURACY; QUALITY; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) was introduced in 2021 to standardize the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer following whole-gland treatment. The system scores image on a scale from 1 to 5 and has shown promising results in single- center studies. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of the PI-RR system in predicting the likelihood of local recurrence after whole-gland treatment. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for diagnostic test accuracy were followed. Relevant databases were searched up to December 2023. Primary studies met the eligibility criteria if they reported MRI diagnostic performance in prostate cancer recurrence using PI-RR. Diagnostic performance for MRI was assessed using two different cutoff points (>3 or >4 for positivity according to the PI-RR system). A meta-analysis with a random- effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity values. Key findings and limitations: Sixteen articles were identified for full-text reading, of which six were considered eligible, involving a total of 467 patients. Using a cutoff of PI-RR >3 (4 studies) for recurrent disease, the sensitivity was 77.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.9-84.1%) and the specificity was 80.2% (95% CI 58.2-92.2%). Using a cutoff of PI-RR >4 (4 studies), the sensitivity was 61.9% (95% CI 35.6-82.7%) and the specificity was 86.6% (95% CI 75.1-93.3%). Overall, the inter-rater agreement varied from fair to excellent. Conclusions and clinical implications: PI-RR is accurate in detecting local recurrence after whole-gland treatment for prostate cancer and shows fair-to-good to excellent inter-reader agreement. Overall, a PI-RR cutoff of >= 3 showed high sensitivity and specificity. Patient summary: We reviewed studies that reported on how good MRI scans using a scoring system called PI-RR were in detecting recurrence of prostate cancer. We found that this system shows good performance, with fair to excellent agreement between dif- ferent radiologists. (c) 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1246 / 1254
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with the prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS): the state of art of prostate cancer diagnosis
    Favorito, Luciano Alves
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (03): : 422 - 423
  • [32] Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Fan
    Liu, Chen-Lu
    Chen, Qian
    Shao, Sheng-Chao
    Chen, Shuang-Qing
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1104):
  • [33] Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Woo, Sungmin
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (01) : 81 - 91
  • [34] Association Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate and Oncological Outcomes after Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Stabile, Armando
    Mazzone, Elio
    Cirulli, Giuseppe O.
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    Grummet, Jeremy
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Emberton, Mark
    Pokorny, Morgan
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (04): : 519 - 528
  • [35] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Oppenheimer, Daniel Corey
    Weinberg, Eric P.
    Hollenberg, Gary M.
    Meyers, Steven P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMAGING SCIENCE, 2016, 6
  • [36] Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in diagnosis of suspicious prostate cancer A meta-analysis
    Cai, Weiguo
    Zhu, Dongyong
    Byanju, Sama
    Chen, Jie
    Zhang, Hanfei
    Wang, Yanfang
    Liao, Meiyan
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (14)
  • [37] Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mazzone, Elio
    Stabile, Armando
    Pellegrino, Francesco
    Basile, Giuseppe
    Cignoli, Daniele
    Cirulli, Giuseppe Ottone
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Barletta, Francesco
    Scuderi, Simone
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (05): : 697 - 713
  • [38] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Daniël F. Osses
    Joost J. van Asten
    Gerard J. Kieft
    Jasper D. Tijsterman
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 207 - 212
  • [39] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Osses, Daniel F.
    van Asten, Joost J.
    Kieft, Gerard J.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [40] The utility of PET-based imaging for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niranjan J. Sathianathen
    Mohit Butaney
    Badrinath R. Konety
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 1239 - 1249