Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility using Geospatial Techniques: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Statistical Models

被引:0
|
作者
Raut, Subrata [1 ]
Dutta, Dipanwita [1 ]
Bera, Debarati [1 ]
Samanta, Rajeeb [2 ]
机构
[1] Vidyasagar Univ, Dept Remote Sensing & GIS, Midnapore, W Bengal, India
[2] Prabhat Kumar Coll, Dept Geog, Contai, W Bengal, India
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
evident belief function; frequency ratio; geospatial datasets; Kalimpong; random forest; support vector machine; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; FREQUENCY RATIO MODEL; BELIEF FUNCTION MODEL; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PROCESS AHP; DARJEELING HIMALAYA; NEURAL-NETWORKS; HAZARD; ZONATION; PARTS;
D O I
10.1002/gj.5080
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study delineates landslide susceptibility zones in the Kalimpong district by integrating multi-sensor datasets and assessing the effectiveness of statistical and machine learning models for precision mapping. The analysis utilises a comprehensive geospatial dataset, including remote sensing imagery, topographical, geological, and climatic factors. Four models were employed to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) using 16 influencing factors: two bivariate statistical models, frequency ratio (FR) and evidence belief function (EBF) and two machine learning models, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM). Out of 1244 recorded landslide events, 871 events (70%) were used for training the models, and 373 events (30%) for validation. The distribution of susceptibility classes predicted by The RF and SVM models produced similar susceptibility distributions, predicting 13.30% and 14.30% of the area as highly susceptible, and 2.42% and 2.82% as very highly susceptible, respectively. In contrast, the FR model estimated 20.98% of the area as highly susceptible and 4.30% as very highly susceptible, whereas the EBF model predicted 17.42% and 5.89% for these categories, respectively. Model validation using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed that the machine learning models (RF and SVM) had superior prediction accuracy with AUC values of 95.90% and 86.60%, respectively, compared to the statistical models (FR and EBF), which achieved AUC values of 74.30% and 76.80%. The findings indicate that Kalimpong-I is most vulnerable, with 6.76% of its area categorised as very high susceptibility and 24.80% as high susceptibility. Conversely, the Gorubathan block exhibited the least susceptible, with 0.95% and 6.48% of its area classified as very high and high susceptibility, respectively. This research provides essential insights for decision-makers and policy planners in landslide-prone regions and can be instrumental in developing early warning systems, which are vital for enhancing community safety through timely evacuations and preparedness measures.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in Artvin, Turkey using machine learning techniques
    Akinci, Halil
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 191
  • [22] Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm
    Marjanovic, Milos
    Kovacevic, Milos
    Bajat, Branislav
    Vozenilek, Vit
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2011, 123 (03) : 225 - 234
  • [23] Comparative assessment of drought monitoring index susceptibility using geospatial techniques
    Yue, Hui
    Liu, Ying
    Qian, Jiaxin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (29) : 38880 - 38900
  • [24] Comparative assessment of drought monitoring index susceptibility using geospatial techniques
    Hui Yue
    Ying Liu
    Jiaxin Qian
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 38880 - 38900
  • [25] Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Hybrid Integration of Evidential Belief Function and Machine Learning Techniques
    Li, Yang
    Chen, Wei
    WATER, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [26] Application of statistical and machine learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Himalayan road corridors
    Sarfraz, Yasir
    Basharat, Muhammad
    Riaz, Muhammad Tayyib
    Akram, Mian Sohail
    Xu, Chong
    Ahmed, Khawaja Shoaib
    Shahzad, Amir
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Linh, Nguyen Thi Thuy
    OPEN GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 14 (01) : 1606 - 1635
  • [27] Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of statistical techniques
    Baeza, C
    Corominas, J
    LANDSLIDES-BK, 1996, : 147 - 152
  • [28] A comparative study of regional landslide susceptibility mapping with multiple machine learning models
    Wang, Yunhao
    Wang, Luqi
    Liu, Songlin
    Liu, Pengfei
    Zhu, Zhengwei
    Zhang, Wengang
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 59 (09) : 2383 - 2400
  • [29] Sample size effects on landslide susceptibility models: A comparative study of heuristic, statistical, machine learning, deep learning and ensemble learning models with SHAP analysis
    Yang, Shilong
    Tan, Jiayao
    Luo, Danyuan
    Wang, Yuzhou
    Guo, Xu
    Zhu, Qiuyu
    Ma, Chuanming
    Xiong, Hanxiang
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2024, 193
  • [30] Landslide susceptibility assessment with machine learning algorithms
    Marjanovic, Milos
    Bajat, Branislav
    Kovacevic, Milos
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT NETWORKING AND COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS (INCOS 2009), 2009, : 273 - +