Voltage Matrix Algorithm for Intraoperative Detection of Cochlear Implant Electrode Misplacement

被引:0
|
作者
Franke-Trieger, Annett [1 ]
Lailach, Susen [1 ]
Strahl, Stefan B. [2 ]
Murrmann, Katrin [1 ]
Schebsdat, Erik [3 ]
Neudert, Marcus [1 ]
Zahnert, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Saxonian Cochlear Implant Ctr, Dresden, Germany
[2] MED EL Med Elect, Res & Dev, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] MED EL Elektromed Gerate Deutschland GmbH, Starnberg, Germany
关键词
Cochlear implant; Voltagematrix; Tip fold-over; Basal kinking; TIP FOLD-OVER; ARRAY; PANEL;
D O I
10.1159/000543264
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop an algorithm, based on the voltage matrix, for detecting regular cochlear implant (CI) electrode position during the implantation procedure, tip fold-over or basal kinking for lateral-wall electrodes. The availability of an algorithm would be valuable in clinical routine, as incorrect positioning of the electrode array can potentially be recognized intraoperatively. Design: In this retrospective study, intraoperative voltage matrix and postoperative digital volume tomography of 525 CI recipients were analyzed. On the basis of these data an algorithm was developed for detecting various kinds of electrode misplacements. Results: Seven incorrect electrode positions, three tip fold (0.57%) and four basal kinking (0.76%) were detected. For detecting correct positioning, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 83.3%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 99.8% were found. For detecting tip fold-over, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 100%, and a PPV of 100% were found. For detecting basal kinking, a sensitivity of 66%, a specificity of 100%, and a PPV of 100% were determined. Conclusion: The algorithm was found to be an effective screening tool for detecting tip fold-over or basal kinking. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cochlear implant electrode misplaced in the carotid canal
    Son, Eun Jin
    Kim, Sang Cheol
    Choi, Jae Young
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2007, 133 (08) : 827 - 829
  • [42] Nomenclature of cochlear implant electrode insertion approaches
    Todt, Ingo
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2008, 138 (06) : 813 - 813
  • [43] Validation of cochlear implant electrode localization techniques
    Zhao, Yiyuan
    Labadie, Robert F.
    Dawant, Benoit M.
    Noble, Jack H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2018, 10576
  • [44] REHABILITATION AND RESULTS WITH THE SINGLE ELECTRODE COCHLEAR IMPLANT
    MADDOX, HE
    PORTER, TH
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1983, 16 (01) : 257 - 265
  • [45] An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designse
    Dhanasingh, Anandhan
    Jolly, Claude
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 356 : 93 - 103
  • [46] Simulation for Training Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion
    Ma, Xingjun
    Wijewickrema, Sudanthi
    Zhou, Yun
    Copson, Bridget
    Bailey, James
    Kennedy, Gregor
    O'Leary, Stephen
    2017 IEEE 30TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CBMS), 2017, : 1 - 6
  • [47] Electrode Migration in Cochlear Implant Patients: Not an Exception
    van der Marel, Kim S.
    Verbist, Berit M.
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Joemai, Raoul M. S.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2012, 17 (05) : 275 - 281
  • [48] Measuring the cochlea and cochlear implant electrode depth
    Guenette, Jeffrey P.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 1257 - 1259
  • [49] MULTIPLE-ELECTRODE ARRAY FOR A COCHLEAR IMPLANT
    CLARK, GM
    HALLWORTH, RJ
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1976, 90 (07): : 623 - 627
  • [50] Electrode Interaction in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Subjects
    Marc D. Eisen
    Kevin H. Franck
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2005, 6 : 160 - 170