Comparison of the safety of remimazolam and propofol during general anesthesia in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xianchun [1 ]
Zhang, Longyi [1 ]
Zhao, Li [1 ]
Zhou, Xuelei [1 ]
Mao, Wei [1 ]
Chen, Linlin [1 ]
Zhu, Hongyu [1 ]
Xie, Ying [1 ]
Li, Linji [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchong Cent Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchong, Peoples R China
关键词
remimazolam; elderly patients; general anesthesia; meta-analysis; propofol; PAIN;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2025.1409495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Remimazolam is a novel sedative drug approved for procedural sedation and general anesthesia. Clinical trials have already explored its use in elderly patients for general anesthesia. For elderly patients with declining physical and physiological function, anesthesia safety is crucial. Most current clinical studies compare the safety of remimazolam and propofol, though the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the safety of remimazolam and propofol in general anesthesia for elderly patients. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for all published randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol for general anesthesia in elderly patients. We synthesized data from eligible studies using relative risk or mean difference, and analyzed differences in hemodynamic stability and adverse effects between the two drugs. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers. Results Eight randomized controlled trials involving 571 participants were included. Compared to propofol, remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of hypotension (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.33, 0.81], I2 = 18%, p = 0.3 > 0.1) and bradycardia (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: [0.31, 1.02], Z = 1.88, p = 0.06 < 0.05). The mean arterial pressure after induction was higher in the remimazolam group (WMD = 3.95, 95% CI: [3.197, 9.498], Z = 3.95, p < 0.00001). The remimazolam group had a higher heart rate (HR) after induction compared to the propofol group (WMD = 7.89, 95% CI: [-2.39, 18.17], Z = 1.5, p = 0.13 > 0.05), but this result was not statistically significant. Among other secondary outcomes, the remimazolam group had lower incidences of injection site pain, nausea and vomiting, and hypoxemia compared to the propofol group, and also had a shorter extubation time. Conclusion In this meta-analysis, compared to propofol, remimazolam reduced the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and injection site pain during general anesthesia in elderly patients. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were more stable after induction. Remimazolam may be a safer sedative for elderly patients. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024516950, CRD42024516950.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sridharan, Kannan
    Sivaramakrishnan, Gowri
    CURRENT CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 14 (02): : 116 - 124
  • [42] Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam in Short Endoscopic Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xin, Yueyang
    Lu, Pei
    Guan, Shaodi
    Si, Shaomeng
    Sun, Rao
    Xia, Wei
    Xu, Hui
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (03):
  • [43] Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam in Endoscopic Sedation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhu, Xianlin
    Wang, Hongbai
    Yuan, Su
    Li, Yinan
    Jia, Yuan
    Zhang, Zhe
    Yan, Fuxia
    Wang, Zaiping
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [44] Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol in induction of general anesthesia: a reply
    Zhang, Ying
    Dai, Guangrong
    Xu, Hai
    Liu, Yingge
    Liao, Minhui
    Zhang, Xiaobao
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2022, 88 (03) : 194 - 195
  • [45] Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Lin
    Pang, Yi
    Wang, Yongchao
    Li, Qi
    Meng, Xiangchao
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [46] Efficacy and safety of neostigmine for neuromuscular blockade reversal in patients under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ji, Wentao
    Zhang, Xiaoting
    Liu, Jia
    Sun, Guolin
    Wang, Xiandong
    Bo, Lulong
    Deng, Xiaoming
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (22)
  • [47] Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin Li
    Yi Pang
    Yongchao Wang
    Qi Li
    Xiangchao Meng
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [48] Remimazolam has similar anesthetic effect and superior safety compared to propofol in elderly patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dong, Liyun
    Sun, Tianze
    Yang, Jiecheng
    Zhou, Yue
    Liu, Xinyan
    Liu, Zhijie
    Lv, Hangyu
    Ma, Zhen
    Chen, Yongxue
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (09) : 2262 - 2272
  • [49] Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness of Local or General Anesthesia after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Luchen
    Liu, Yanxiang
    Gao, Haoyu
    Zhang, Bowen
    Zhou, Sangyu
    Xie, Mingxin
    Sun, Xiaogang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [50] Ventilation Strategies During General Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bolther, Maria
    Henriksen, Jeppe
    Holmberg, Mathias J.
    Jessen, Marie K.
    Vallentin, Mikael F.
    Hansen, Frederik B.
    Holst, Johanne M.
    Magnussen, Andreas
    Hansen, Niklas S.
    Johannsen, Cecilie M.
    Enevoldsen, Johannes
    Jensen, Thomas H.
    Roessler, Lara L.
    Lind, Peter Caroe
    Klitholm, Maibritt P.
    Eggertsen, Mark A.
    Caap, Philip
    Boye, Caroline
    Dabrowski, Karol M.
    Vormfenne, Lasse
    Hoybye, Maria
    Karlsson, Mathias
    Balleby, Ida R.
    Rasmussen, Marie S.
    Paelestik, Kim
    Granfeldt, Asger
    Andersen, Lars W.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 135 (05): : 971 - 985