Comparison of the safety of remimazolam and propofol during general anesthesia in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xianchun [1 ]
Zhang, Longyi [1 ]
Zhao, Li [1 ]
Zhou, Xuelei [1 ]
Mao, Wei [1 ]
Chen, Linlin [1 ]
Zhu, Hongyu [1 ]
Xie, Ying [1 ]
Li, Linji [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchong Cent Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchong, Peoples R China
关键词
remimazolam; elderly patients; general anesthesia; meta-analysis; propofol; PAIN;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2025.1409495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Remimazolam is a novel sedative drug approved for procedural sedation and general anesthesia. Clinical trials have already explored its use in elderly patients for general anesthesia. For elderly patients with declining physical and physiological function, anesthesia safety is crucial. Most current clinical studies compare the safety of remimazolam and propofol, though the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the safety of remimazolam and propofol in general anesthesia for elderly patients. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for all published randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol for general anesthesia in elderly patients. We synthesized data from eligible studies using relative risk or mean difference, and analyzed differences in hemodynamic stability and adverse effects between the two drugs. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers. Results Eight randomized controlled trials involving 571 participants were included. Compared to propofol, remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of hypotension (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.33, 0.81], I2 = 18%, p = 0.3 > 0.1) and bradycardia (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: [0.31, 1.02], Z = 1.88, p = 0.06 < 0.05). The mean arterial pressure after induction was higher in the remimazolam group (WMD = 3.95, 95% CI: [3.197, 9.498], Z = 3.95, p < 0.00001). The remimazolam group had a higher heart rate (HR) after induction compared to the propofol group (WMD = 7.89, 95% CI: [-2.39, 18.17], Z = 1.5, p = 0.13 > 0.05), but this result was not statistically significant. Among other secondary outcomes, the remimazolam group had lower incidences of injection site pain, nausea and vomiting, and hypoxemia compared to the propofol group, and also had a shorter extubation time. Conclusion In this meta-analysis, compared to propofol, remimazolam reduced the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and injection site pain during general anesthesia in elderly patients. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were more stable after induction. Remimazolam may be a safer sedative for elderly patients. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024516950, CRD42024516950.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
    An, Xincan
    Shen, Tianqi
    Yin, Xingxing
    Xu, Jin
    Zhang, Yongming
    Wang, Tianlong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [32] The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
    Xincan An
    Tianqi Shen
    Xingxing Yin
    Jin Xu
    Yongming Zhang
    Tianlong Wang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24
  • [33] Comparison of propofol and volatile agents for maintenance of anesthesia during elective craniotomy procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chui, Jason
    Mariappan, Ramamani
    Mehta, Jigesh
    Manninen, Pirjo
    Venkatraghavan, Lashmi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2014, 61 (04): : 347 - 356
  • [34] Dexmedetomidine effect on delirium in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Youran
    Bu, Xinyi
    Zhao, Na
    Wang, Shuxia
    Wang, Xiaoliang
    Ge, Yali
    Yi, Honggang
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (48)
  • [35] Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barbosa, Eduardo Cerchi
    Santo, Paula Arruda Espirito
    Baraldo, Stefano
    Meine, Gilmara Coelho
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (06) : 1219 - 1229
  • [36] Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol in induction of general anesthesia
    Dai, Guangrong
    Pei, Lili
    Duan, Fenyu
    Liao, Minhui
    Zhang, Yanke
    Zhu, Mengxue
    Zhao, Zhibin
    Zhang, Xiaobao
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2021, 87 (10) : 1073 - 1079
  • [37] Postoperative delirium under general anaesthesia by remimazolam versus propofol: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Suga, Masafumi
    Yasuhara, Jun
    Watanabe, Atsuyuki
    Takagi, Hisato
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Nishimura, Takeshi
    Ijuin, Shinichi
    Taira, Takuya
    Inoue, Akihiko
    Ishihara, Satoshi
    Pakavakis, Adrian
    Glassford, Neil
    Shehabi, Yahya
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2025, 101
  • [38] Propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qin, Peishun
    Kang, Dingxin
    Qian, Xiaowei
    Jin, Lexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (07): : 13634 - 13641
  • [39] The systematic review and meta-analysis of free flap safety in the elderly patients
    Ustun, Galip Gencay
    Aksu, Ali Emre
    Uzun, Hakan
    Bitik, Ozan
    MICROSURGERY, 2017, 37 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [40] Remimazolam Versus Propofol in General Anesthesia of Complex Surgery in Critical and Non-Critical Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Munoz-Carrillo, Jose Luis
    Rodriguez-Cortes, Natalie
    Levano, Sandra Trujillo
    Moran-Marinos, Cristian
    Barboza, Joshuan J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (24)