Comparison of the safety of remimazolam and propofol during general anesthesia in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xianchun [1 ]
Zhang, Longyi [1 ]
Zhao, Li [1 ]
Zhou, Xuelei [1 ]
Mao, Wei [1 ]
Chen, Linlin [1 ]
Zhu, Hongyu [1 ]
Xie, Ying [1 ]
Li, Linji [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchong Cent Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchong, Peoples R China
关键词
remimazolam; elderly patients; general anesthesia; meta-analysis; propofol; PAIN;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2025.1409495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Remimazolam is a novel sedative drug approved for procedural sedation and general anesthesia. Clinical trials have already explored its use in elderly patients for general anesthesia. For elderly patients with declining physical and physiological function, anesthesia safety is crucial. Most current clinical studies compare the safety of remimazolam and propofol, though the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the safety of remimazolam and propofol in general anesthesia for elderly patients. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for all published randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol for general anesthesia in elderly patients. We synthesized data from eligible studies using relative risk or mean difference, and analyzed differences in hemodynamic stability and adverse effects between the two drugs. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers. Results Eight randomized controlled trials involving 571 participants were included. Compared to propofol, remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of hypotension (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.33, 0.81], I2 = 18%, p = 0.3 > 0.1) and bradycardia (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: [0.31, 1.02], Z = 1.88, p = 0.06 < 0.05). The mean arterial pressure after induction was higher in the remimazolam group (WMD = 3.95, 95% CI: [3.197, 9.498], Z = 3.95, p < 0.00001). The remimazolam group had a higher heart rate (HR) after induction compared to the propofol group (WMD = 7.89, 95% CI: [-2.39, 18.17], Z = 1.5, p = 0.13 > 0.05), but this result was not statistically significant. Among other secondary outcomes, the remimazolam group had lower incidences of injection site pain, nausea and vomiting, and hypoxemia compared to the propofol group, and also had a shorter extubation time. Conclusion In this meta-analysis, compared to propofol, remimazolam reduced the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and injection site pain during general anesthesia in elderly patients. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were more stable after induction. Remimazolam may be a safer sedative for elderly patients. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024516950, CRD42024516950.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of remimazolam and propofol about safety outcome indicators during general anesthesia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Xueyan
    Wang, Chenghua
    Gao, Hong
    Bai, Xue
    Zhang, Zhongwei
    Chen, Rui
    Huang, Xiang
    An, Li
    Yi, Jing
    Tong, Rui
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (06) : 553 - 564
  • [2] Comparison between hemodynamic effects of remimazolam and propofol during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wegner, Bruno M.
    Wegner, Gustavo M.
    Spagnol, Luigi W.
    Costa, Luis A.
    Spagnol, Valentine W.
    Paiva, Daniel F.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024, 90 (10) : 901 - 911
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of remimazolam vs. propofol for general anesthesia with tracheal intubation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luo, Hong
    Tang, Zuolei
    BIOMEDICAL REPORTS, 2025, 22 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of Remimazolam-Flumazenil versus Propofol for Recovery from General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Quantong
    Xu, Fuchao
    Wang, Jie
    Jiang, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (23)
  • [5] The use of remimazolam versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ko, Ching-Chung
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Illias, Amina M.
    Chiu, Chong-Chi
    Yu, Chia-Hung
    Lin, Chien-Ming
    Chen, I-Wen
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [6] Safety and efficacy comparison of remimazolam and propofol for intravenous anesthesia during gastroenteroscopic surgery of older patients: A meta-analysis
    Li, Fang-Zhuo
    Zhao, Cheng
    Tang, Yi-Xun
    Liu, Ji-Tong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [7] The safety and efficacy between remimazolam and propofol in intravenous anesthesia of endoscopy operation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Mei-ji
    Hu, Hai-feng
    Li, Xin-lei
    Li, Xiao-ming
    Wang, Da-chuan
    Kuang, Ming-jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (11) : 3566 - 3577
  • [8] Comparison of the recovery quality between remimazolam and propofol after general anesthesia: systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhu, Caiyun
    Xie, Ran
    Qin, Fang
    Wang, Naiguo
    Tang, Hui
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [9] A commentary on 'The safety and efficacy between remimazolam and propofol in intravenous anesthesia of endoscopy operation: a systematic review and meta-analysis'
    Ren, Hongxu
    Lv, Zhaojie
    Liu, Zijun
    Wang, Haibo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (07) : 4518 - 4519
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Versus Etomidate for Induction of General Anesthesia: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Li
    Guo, Yiping
    Zhou, Xuelei
    Mao, Wei
    Chen, Linlin
    Xie, Ying
    Li, Linji
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13