Robotic-Assisted Versus Navigation-Assisted Posterior Lumbar Fusion

被引:1
|
作者
Gouzoulis, Michael J. [1 ]
Seddio, Anthony E. [1 ]
Winter, Adam D. [1 ]
Jabbouri, Sahir S. [1 ]
Zhu, Justin R. [1 ]
Rubio, Daniel R. [1 ]
Varthi, Arya G. [1 ]
Grauer, Jonathan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, PO 208071, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
robotics; navigations; lumbar fusion; pearldiver; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY; 90-DAY COMPLICATIONS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000005032
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative adverse events and reoperations between navigation-assisted and robotic-assisted posterior lumbar fusion. Summary of Background data. Navigation has become increasingly utilized for posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). More recently, robotic-assisted systems have been gaining traction. However, the incremental advantage of these systems has been unclear in the literature. Methods. Patients undergoing one-level to three-level PLF (with or without anterior or posterior interbody fusion) were identified from the 2015 to 2022 M161Ortho PearlDiver Database using CPT codes. Navigation assistance was identified based on CPT coding and robotic assistance was based on ICD-10 procedural coding. Navigation-assisted cases were matched 4:1 to robotic-assisted patients based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, number of levels fuse, and concomitant anterior fusion. Incidence of 90-day adverse outcomes were assessed and compared with multivariable logistical regression. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple testing. Rate of reoperation was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results. From 2015 to 2022, there has been a significant increase in both navigation-assisted and robotic-assisted lumbar fusions, with navigation-assisted surgery being significantly more common. After matching, there were 2401 navigation-assisted cases and 651 robotic-assisted cases. On multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in 90-day any, severe, or minor adverse events. There was a significant increase odd of readmissions in the robotic cohort (OR: 1.77, P<0.001). There were no differences in 3-year reoperation rates between the navigation-assisted and robotic-assisted cohorts (95.8% vs. 94.0%, P=0.30). Conclusions. As spinal navigation has been gaining popularity and robotic assistance is starting to be further utilized, the incremental advantage of different techniques may be questioned. While further study and technique evolution are ongoing, the current study was not able to demonstrate 90-day or 3-year incremental advantages for robotics relative to navigation based on the metrics evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:1483 / 1487
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy and safety of robotic navigation-assisted distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia
    Zhang, Ziwei
    Zhao, Zhijie
    Han, Wenqing
    Kim, Byeong Seop
    Yan, Yingjie
    Chen, Xiaojun
    Lin, Li
    Shen, Weimin
    Chai, Gang
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [22] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Screw Placement: A Case Report
    McVeigh, Luke
    Anokwute, Miracle C.
    Huh, Andrew
    Blucker, Nathaniel
    Lane, Brandon C.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [23] Robotic-Assisted Decompression, Decortication, and Instrumentation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Altorfer, Franziska C. S.
    Avrumova, Fedan
    Lebl, Darren R.
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [24] Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improved component alignment in the coronal plane compared with navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study
    Yasuyuki Omichi
    Daisuke Hamada
    Keizo Wada
    Yasuaki Tamaki
    Shota Shigekiyo
    Koichi Sairyo
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 2831 - 2839
  • [25] Navigation and Robotic-Assisted Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Feasibility, Safety, and Case Series
    North, Robert Y.
    Strong, Michael J.
    Yee, Timothy J.
    Kashlan, Osama N.
    Oppenlander, Mark E.
    Park, Paul
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : 221 - +
  • [26] Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improved component alignment in the coronal plane compared with navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study
    Omichi, Yasuyuki
    Hamada, Daisuke
    Wada, Keizo
    Tamaki, Yasuaki
    Shigekiyo, Shota
    Sairyo, Koichi
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (06) : 2831 - 2839
  • [27] Workflow and Efficiency of Robotic-Assisted Navigation in Spine Surgery
    Avrumova, Fedan
    Sivaganesan, Ahilan
    Alluri, Ram Kiran
    Vaishnav, Avani
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    Lebl, Darren R.
    HSS JOURNAL, 2021, 17 (03) : 302 - 307
  • [28] Epicardial thoracoscopic robotic-assisted catheter navigation in a pig
    De Sensi, Francesco
    Berruezo, Antonio
    Miracapillo, Gennaro
    Formisano, Giampaolo
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Limbruno, Ugo
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (03) : 361 - 362
  • [29] Epicardial thoracoscopic robotic-assisted catheter navigation in a pig
    Francesco De Sensi
    Antonio Berruezo
    Gennaro Miracapillo
    Giampaolo Formisano
    Paolo Pietro Bianchi
    Ugo Limbruno
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2019, 56 : 361 - 362
  • [30] MICROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    MITSUNAGA, MM
    CHONG, G
    MAES, KE
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1991, (263) : 121 - 127