Robotic-Assisted Decompression, Decortication, and Instrumentation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Altorfer, Franziska C. S. [1 ]
Avrumova, Fedan [1 ]
Lebl, Darren R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Spine Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
SPINE SURGERY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00080
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Robotic-assisted spine surgery has been reported to improve the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement and to reduce blood loss, hospital length of stay, and early postoperative pain(1). Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is a procedure that is well suited to be improved by recent innovations in robotic-assisted spine surgery. Heretofore, the capability of robotic navigation and software in spine surgery has been limited to assistance with pedicle screw insertion. Surgical decompression and decortication of osseous anatomy in preparation for biological fusion had historically been outside the scope of robotic-assisted spine surgery. In 2009, early attempts to perform surgical decompressions in a porcine model utilizing the da Vinci Surgical Robot for laminotomy and laminectomy were limited by the available technology(2). Recent advances in software and instrumentation allow registration, surgical planning, and robotic-assisted surgery on the posterior elements of the spine. A human cadaveric study assessed the accuracy of robotic-assisted bone laminectomy, revealing precision in the cutting plane(3). Robotic-assisted facet decortication, decompression, interbody cage implantation, and pedicle screw fixation add automation and accuracy to MI-TLIF. Description: A surgical robotic system comprises an operating room table-mounted surgical arm with 6 degrees of freedom that is physically connected to the patient's osseous anatomy with either a percutaneous Steinmann pin to the pelvis or a spinous process clamp. The Mazor X Stealth Edition Spine Robotic System (Version 5.1; Medtronic) is utilized, and a preoperative plan is created with use of software for screw placement, facet decortication, and decompression. The workstation is equipped with interface software designed to streamline the surgical process according to preoperative planning, intraoperative image acquisition, registration, and real-time control over robotic motion. The combination of these parameters enables the precise execution of preplanned facet joint decortication, osseous decompression, and screw trajectories. Consequently, this technique grants the surgeon guidance for the drilling and insertion of screws, as well as guidance for robotic resection of bone with a bone-removal drill. Alternatives: The exploration of robotically guided facet joint decortication and decompression in MI-TLIF presents an innovative alternative to the existing surgical approaches, which involve manual bone removal and can be less precise. Other robotic systems commonly utilized in spine surgery include the ROSA (Zimmer Biomet), the ExcelsiusGPS (Globus Medical), and the Cirq (Brainlab)(4). Rationale: The present video article provides a comprehensive guide for executing robotic-assisted MI-TLIF, including robotic facet decortication and osseous decompression. The introduction of advanced robotic technology capable of both decompressing bone and providing implant guidance represents a considerable advancement in robotic-assisted spine surgery. Software planning for robotic-assisted decortication of fused surfaces, surgical decompression, interbody cage placement, and pedicle screw placement allows for a less invasive and more precise MI-TLIF. Expected Outcomes: Anticipated outcomes include reduction in low back and leg pain, improved functional status, and successful spinal fusion. Radiographic outcomes are expected to show restored foraminal height and solid bony fusion. Further, enhanced surgical precision, reduced approach-related morbidity by expanded robotic capabilities in spinal fusion surgery, and a shift from manual bone removal to precise mechanized techniques can be expected. The introduction of robotic-assisted facet joint decortication and decompression represents a notable milestone in spine surgery, enhancing patient care and technological advancement.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Martinez, Orlando
    Shah, Varunil
    Herring, Eric Z.
    Labak, Collin M.
    Mauria, Rohit
    Smith, Gabriel A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC NURSING, 2025, 44 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [2] Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation
    Isaacs, RE
    Podichetty, VK
    Santiago, P
    Sandhu, FA
    Spears, J
    Kelly, K
    Rice, L
    Fessler, RG
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 3 (02) : 98 - 105
  • [3] Perioperative Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopically Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    De Biase, Gaetano
    Gassie, Kelly
    Garcia, Diogo
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley
    Deen, Gordon
    Nottmeier, Eric
    Chen, Selby
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 149 : E570 - E575
  • [4] Perioperative Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopically Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    De Biase, Gaetano
    Gassie, Kelly
    Garcia, Diogo
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley
    Deen, Gordon
    Nottmeier, Eric
    Chen, Selby
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 149 : E570 - E575
  • [5] Robotic-Assisted vs Nonrobotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Garcia, Diogo
    Akinduro, Oluwaseun O.
    De Biase, Gaetano
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    Jerreld, Daniel J.
    Dholakia, Ruchita
    Borah, Bijan
    Nottmeier, Eric
    Deen, H. Gordon
    Fox, W. Christopher
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Chen, Selby
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 90 (02) : 192 - 198
  • [6] Closing the Gap: The Incidence of Complications in Minimally Invasive Tubular, Endoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures
    Gerling, Michael
    Baker, Melissa
    Stanton, Eloise
    Pyun, Joseph
    Chaladoff, Evan
    Passias, Peter
    Buser, Zorica
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 189 : E492 - E497
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [8] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [9] Commentary: Robotic-Assisted vs Nonrobotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Vaz-Guimaraes, Francisco
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 90 (02) : E34 - E34
  • [10] Commentary: Robotic-Assisted vs Nonrobotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Zusman, Edie E.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 90 (03) : E70 - E70