Decomposing significant factors of Coulomb stress and its components in injection-induced seismicity

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Yongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaying [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Yiyan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Rock & Soil Mech, State Key Lab Geomech & Geotech Engn, Wuhan 430071, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Injection-induced seismicity; Poroelastic coupling; Response surface; Coulomb stress; FAULTS; SLIP; OKLAHOMA; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.12.009
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Injection-induced seismicity has been a focus of industry for decades as it poses great challenges to the associated risk mitigation and hazard assessment. The response surface methodology is integrated into the geo-mechanical model to analyze the effects of multiple factors on induced seismicity during the post shut-in period. We investigate the roles of poroelastic stress and pore pressure diffusion and examine the differences in the controlling mechanism between fault damage zones and the fault core. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to rank the selected factors, followed by a Box-Behnken design to form response surfaces and formulate prediction models for the Coulomb stress and its components. Reservoir properties significantly affect the potentials of induced seismicity in the fault by changing pore pressure diffusion, which can be influenced by other factors to varying degrees. Coulomb stress is greater in pressurized damage zones than in fault cores, and the seismicity rate exhibits a consistent variation. Poroelastic stress plays a similar role to pore pressure diffusion in the stability of the fault within the pressurized damage zones. However, pore pressure diffusion dominates in the fault core due to the low rigidity, which limits the accumulation of elastic energy caused by poroelastic coupling. The slip along the fault core is a critical issue to consider. The potential for induced seismicity is reduced in the right damage zones as the pore pressure diffusion is blocked by the low-permeability fault core. However, poroelastic stressing still occurs, and in deep basements, the poroelastic effect is dominant even without a direct increase in pore pressure. The findings in this study reveal the fundamental mechanisms behind injection-induced seismicity and provide guidance for optimizing injection schemes in specific situations. (c) 2024 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:4895 / 4908
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Energy of injection-induced seismicity predicted from in-situ experiments
    De Barros, Louis
    Cappa, Frederic
    Guglielmi, Yves
    Duboeuf, Laure
    Grasso, Jean-Robert
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [32] INJECTION-INDUCED STRESS AND FRACTURE ORIENTATION CHANGES
    DUSSEAULT, MB
    SIMMONS, JV
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 19 (04) : 483 - 493
  • [33] Effect of the Injection Scenario on the Rate and Magnitude Content of Injection-Induced Seismicity: Case of a Heterogeneous Fault
    Michelle, Almakari
    Pierre, Dublanchet
    Herve, Chauris
    Frederic, Pellet
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2019, 124 (08) : 8426 - 8448
  • [34] A Coulomb stress model for induced seismicity distribution due to fluid injection and withdrawal in deep boreholes
    Troiano, Antonio
    Di Giuseppe, Maria Giulia
    Troise, Claudia
    Tramelli, Anna
    De Natale, Giuseppe
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 195 (01) : 504 - 512
  • [35] Discrete element modeling of fluid injection-induced seismicity and activation of nearby fault
    Yoon, Jeoung Seok
    Zimmermann, Guenyter
    Zang, Arno
    Stephansson, Ove
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (10) : 1457 - 1465
  • [36] Controls of fault geometry and thermal stress on fault slip modes: Implications for permeability enhancement and injection-induced seismicity
    Eyinla D.S.
    Oladunjoye M.A.
    Petroleum Research, 2021, 6 (04) : 392 - 407
  • [37] Controls of fault geometry and thermal stress on fault slip modes:Implications for permeability enhancement and injection-induced seismicity
    Dorcas SEyinla
    Michael AOladunjoye
    Petroleum Research, 2021, (04) : 392 - 407
  • [38] Fluid injection-induced seismicity considering secondary damage and heterogeneity in the surrounding rock
    Jian-Bo Zhu
    Jianqi Kang
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2020, 79 : 2635 - 2646
  • [39] Fluid injection-induced seismicity considering secondary damage and heterogeneity in the surrounding rock
    Zhu, Jian-Bo
    Kang, Jianqi
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 79 (05) : 2635 - 2646
  • [40] Modeling Injection-Induced Seismicity with the Physics-Based Earthquake Simulator RSQSim
    Dieterich, James H.
    Richards-Dinger, Keith B.
    Kroll, Kayla A.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 86 (04) : 1102 - 1109