A Coulomb stress model for induced seismicity distribution due to fluid injection and withdrawal in deep boreholes

被引:13
|
作者
Troiano, Antonio [1 ]
Di Giuseppe, Maria Giulia [1 ]
Troise, Claudia [1 ]
Tramelli, Anna [1 ]
De Natale, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Osserv Vesuviano, INGV, I-80124 Naples, Italy
关键词
Geomechanics; Fracture and flow; Computational seismology; SOULTZ-SOUS-FORETS; SITE; FRANCE; GRANITE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggt229
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Fluid injection in and withdrawal from wells are basic procedures in mining activities and deep resources exploitation, such as oil and gas extraction, permeability enhancement for geothermal exploitation and waste fluid disposal. All of these activities have the potential to induce seismicity, as exemplified by the 2006 Basel earthquake (M-L 3.4). Despite several decades of experience, the mechanisms of induced seismicity are not known in detail, which prevents effective risk assessment and/or mitigation. In this study, we provide an interpretation of induced seismicity based on computation of Coulomb stress changes that result from fluid injection/withdrawal at depth, mainly focused on the interpretation of induced seismicity due to stimulation of a geothermal reservoir. Seismicity is, theoretically, more likely where Coulomb stress changes are larger. For modeling purposes, we simulate the thermodynamic evolution of a system after fluid injection/withdrawal. The associated changes in pressure and temperature are subsequently considered as sources of incremental stress changes, which are then converted to Coulomb stress changes on favourably oriented faults, taking into account the background regional stress. Numerical results are applied to the water injection that was performed to create the fractured reservoir at the enhanced-geothermal-system site, Soultz-sous-Forets (France). Our approach describes well the observed seismicity, and provides an explanation for the different behaviors of a system when fluids are injected or withdrawn.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 512
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] A model for fluid-injection-induced seismicity at the KTB, Germany
    Baisch, S
    Harjes, HP
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 152 (01) : 160 - 170
  • [3] Reliability of earthquake-size distribution and stress regime relationships for fluid-injection-induced seismicity
    Mehrabifard, A.
    Eberhardt, E.
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 226
  • [4] Decomposing significant factors of Coulomb stress and its components in injection-induced seismicity
    Zhang, Yao
    Li, Qi
    Tan, Yongsheng
    Li, Xiaying
    Zhong, Yiyan
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 16 (12) : 4895 - 4908
  • [5] Injection-Induced Seismicity Size Distribution Dependent on Shear Stress
    Mukuhira, Y.
    Fehler, M. C.
    Ito, T.
    Asanuma, H.
    Haring, M. O.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (08)
  • [6] A statistical model for the seismicity rate of fluid-injection-induced earthquakes
    Parotidis, M
    Shapiro, SA
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (17) : L176091 - 5
  • [7] The role of Coulomb stress changes for injection-induced seismicity: The Basel enhanced geothermal system
    Catalli, Flaminia
    Meier, Men-Andrin
    Wiemer, Stefan
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [8] Fault slip and seismicity induced by subsurface fluid withdrawal
    Germanovich, LN
    Chanpura, RA
    Ring, LM
    ROCK MECHANICS FOR INDUSTRY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 1145 - 1154
  • [9] A numerical model for fluid injection induced seismicity at Soultz-sous-Forets
    Baisch, Stefan
    Voeroes, Robert
    Rothert, Elmar
    Stang, Henrik
    Jung, Reinhard
    Schellschmidt, Ruediger
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2010, 47 (03) : 405 - 413
  • [10] Numerical modeling of induced seismicity associated with fluid injection and withdrawal using 2D discrete element fracture network model
    Yoon, J. S.
    Zang, A.
    Zimmermann, G.
    Stephansson, O.
    ROCK MECHANICS FOR RESOURCES, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, : 537 - 542